Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Chengdu Better City FC: match statistics
Chengdu Better City FC holds the top position in the table with an impressive record of 2 wins in 2 matches and a goal difference of 6:1, demonstrating their dominant form this season. The hosts Chongqing Tongliang Long, despite a solid home performance (100% effectiveness in home matches and zero goals conceded), have a significantly weaker goal difference (1:0) and lower offensive productivity. Chengdu shows an advantage in the last 5 matches overall, scoring 10 goals and maintaining a better points average (1.4 vs 1.8 for the hosts). The lack of detailed away statistics for Chengdu complicates a full assessment, but their top position and offensive power suggest they are the favorite. An away win is predicted, although the hosts' solid defense at home gives a chance for a draw.
Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Chengdu Better City FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chongqing Tongliang Long played against Chengdu Better City FC in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Recent form
Chongqing Tongliang Long has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Chengdu Better City FC has 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 0.00. Chengdu Better City FC scores 3.00 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.95 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's games and 50% of Chengdu Better City FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chengdu Better City FC has the higher season xG average, 2.59 to 1.25 per game. Chongqing Tongliang Long takes 11.5 shots per game, while Chengdu Better City FC takes 22.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Chongqing Tongliang Long leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Chengdu Better City FC leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chongqing Tongliang Long's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For Chengdu Better City FC, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Chinese Super League games average 2.95 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chengdu Better City FC holds the top position in the table with an impressive record of 2 wins in 2 matches and a goal difference of 6:1, demonstrating their dominant form this season. The hosts Chongqing Tongliang Long, despite a solid home performance (100% effectiveness in home matches and zero goals conceded), have a significantly weaker goal difference (1:0) and lower offensive productivity. Chengdu shows an advantage in the last 5 matches overall, scoring 10 goals and maintaining a better points average (1.4 vs 1.8 for the hosts). The lack of detailed away statistics for Chengdu complicates a full assessment, but their top position and offensive power suggest they are the favorite. An away win is predicted, although the hosts' solid defense at home gives a chance for a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Chengdu Better City FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chengdu Better City FC is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 3 pts / game - Chengdu Better City FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chengdu Better City FC is 500% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 3 goals / game - Chengdu Better City FC
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Chengdu Better City FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).
Chengdu Better City FC scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 100% (2 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Over / Under - Chengdu Better City FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chengdu Better City FC is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 2 pts / game - Chengdu Better City FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Chengdu Better City FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chongqing Tongliang Long
Chengdu Better City FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Liga | Chengdu Better City FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 0.50 | 2.95 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 52% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 100% | 24% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 0% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Chengdu Better City FC?
The Chinese Super League match finished Chongqing Tongliang Long 3:3 Chengdu Better City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Chengdu Better City FC?
Chongqing Tongliang Long score 0.50 goals per game on average and Chengdu Better City FC 3.00. The Chinese Super League average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's matches and 50% of Chengdu Better City FC's.
What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and Chengdu Better City FC in?
Over the last 5 games Chongqing Tongliang Long have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Chengdu Better City FC 2-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Chengdu Better City FC?
The statistical background for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Chengdu Better City FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.