Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Youth Island: match statistics
Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Youth Island: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Chongqing Tongliang Long play Qingdao Youth Island in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Chongqing Tongliang Long: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Qingdao Youth Island: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.21 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Qingdao Youth Island scores 1.21 and concedes 1.53. League average: 3.09 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Chongqing Tongliang Long 58%, Qingdao Youth Island 74%. Over 2.5: Chongqing Tongliang Long 37%, Qingdao Youth Island 42%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Qingdao Youth Island has higher xG: 1.22 vs 0.98. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.7 shots per match, Qingdao Youth Island: 10.6.
Match halves
Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.79. Qingdao Youth Island: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (6 goals). Qingdao Youth Island: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I forecast a home win (1). Chongqing Tongliang Long average 2.0 goals per home match (11 goals in the season) with 1.4 xG, while Qingdao register only 0.5 goals per away match (4 goals in the season) and 1.13 xG. The favorites generate higher-quality chances: 5 shots on target per match and 17% conversion versus the visitors’ 2.25 shots on target and 5% conversion, translating into significantly more genuine scoring opportunities. Defensively the hosts concede 1.0 goal at home on average (xG against 0.91), whereas the visitors concede 2.75 goals away (xG against 1.67); Qingdao have yet to win on the road (0% wins) and suffer 75% defeats away, with 50% of away matches ending without a goal scored. Additionally, the hosts have won 4 of their last 5 matches and collect 2.6 points on average in that span versus the visitors’ 1.2 points, therefore I assign a clear advantage to the home side.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Qingdao Youth Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Qingdao Youth Island is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.6 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.11 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.53 goals / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Qingdao Youth Island keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
Qingdao Youth Island scores in 79% of matches (15 of 19 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Chongqing Tongliang Long
Over / Under — Qingdao Youth Island
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Qingdao Youth Island is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.37 pts / match - Qingdao Youth Island
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Qingdao Youth Island - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Chongqing Tongliang Long
Qingdao Youth Island
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Liga | Qingdao Youth Island | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.32 | 3.09 | ▼ 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 65% | ▲ 74% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 59% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 19% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 70% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 84% | 89% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Youth Island?
The Chinese Super League match finished Chongqing Tongliang Long 1:1 Qingdao Youth Island. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Youth Island?
Chongqing Tongliang Long score 1.21 goals per game on average and Qingdao Youth Island 1.21. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's matches and 74% of Qingdao Youth Island's.
What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and Qingdao Youth Island in?
Over the last 5 games Chongqing Tongliang Long have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Qingdao Youth Island 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Qingdao Youth Island?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.