Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shandong Luneng: match statistics
Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shandong Luneng: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chongqing Tongliang Long played against Shandong Luneng in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Chongqing Tongliang Long has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Shandong Luneng has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.04 goals per game and allows 1.23. Shandong Luneng scores 1.77 and allows 1.65. Games in this league average 3.13 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's games and 73% of Shandong Luneng's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 69%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shandong Luneng has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.06 per game. Chongqing Tongliang Long takes 9.4 shots per game, while Shandong Luneng takes 13.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Chongqing Tongliang Long leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Shandong Luneng leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.92 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chongqing Tongliang Long's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Shandong Luneng, it is minutes 0-15 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Chinese Super League games average 3.13 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shandong Luneng are 6th with 13 wins this season, while Chongqing Tongliang Long sit 10th with 7 wins. The visitors are also in better form: they have scored 7 goals and won twice in their last five matches, while the hosts have managed just 2 goals and are yet to win. However, Shandong do not have a clear edge away from home, averaging 1.31 goals scored and conceding as many as 1.92, while Chongqing average 1.31 goals both scored and conceded at home. The quality of chances created is similar, with away xG of 1.29 for the visitors and home xG of 1.25 for the hosts. However, Shandong’s defense allows chances worth 1.84 xG per match, compared with 1.03 for Chongqing. The hosts’ recent lack of goalscoring form points towards the visitors, although their defensive struggles away from home make this a risky pick.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest case for both teams to score is that BTTS landed in 92% of Chongqing’s matches, with the hosts averaging 2.23 goals and never finishing a match without scoring. Shandong conceded an average of 1.92 goals, while opponents posted an xG of 1.84, giving the hosts a clear chance to find the net. The visitors averaged 1.31 goals, and Chongqing kept a clean sheet in only 8% of matches, which also supports the other side of the bet. Caution is warranted, however: Shandong failed to score in 31% of matches, while the hosts averaged just 0.4 goals across their last five games. Despite this dip in attacking form, the season statistics and the visitors’ weak defense point towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
At least 2 goals were scored in 100% of Chongqing’s matches and 77% of Shandong’s, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. The hosts average 2.23 goals and 5.92 shots on target per match, while the visitors concede an average of 1.92 goals, which favors Chongqing finding the net. Shandong could also get on the scoresheet: they average 1.31 goals, and the hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 8% of matches. The forecast is tempered by Chongqing’s recent form — just 0.4 goals per match across their last five appearances — so despite an expected total of 3.05 goals, I rate Over 2.5 considerably more cautiously than Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is that Chongqing lead at the break and maintain their advantage until the final whistle. The hosts were ahead at half-time in 46% of matches, while Shandong were trailing at that point in 54%; Chongqing scored an average of 1.08 goals before the break, whereas the visitors conceded 0.92. The second-half record also supports the hosts holding their lead: they won the second half in 62% of matches and scored an average of 1.15 goals, while the visitors conceded an average of 1.00 after the break. Chongqing’s season-long attacking advantage stands at 2.23 goals per match compared with Shandong’s 1.31, although their last five outings call for caution: the hosts scored just 0.4 goals per match in that span and did not lead at half-time once. Therefore, 1/1 remains the strongest individual HT/FT pick, but its edge over the other scenarios is not substantial.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Shandong Luneng | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shandong Luneng is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 2 pts / game - Shandong Luneng
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shandong Luneng is 70% better for: goals scored per game.
1.04 goals / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.77 goals / game - Shandong Luneng
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.23 goals / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.65 goals / game - Shandong Luneng
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 games), while Shandong Luneng keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 games).
Shandong Luneng scores in 85% of games (22 of 26 games), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Over / Under - Shandong Luneng
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shandong Luneng is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.42 pts / game - Shandong Luneng
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Shandong Luneng - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chongqing Tongliang Long
Shandong Luneng
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Chongqing Tongliang Long | Liga | Shandong Luneng | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.27 | 3.13 | ▲ 3.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 64% | ▲ 73% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 58% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 21% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 71% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 87% | • 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Chongqing Tongliang Long's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Shandong Luneng. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shandong Luneng?
The Chinese Super League match finished Chongqing Tongliang Long 1:1 Shandong Luneng. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shandong Luneng?
Chongqing Tongliang Long score 1.04 goals per game on average and Shandong Luneng 1.77. The Chinese Super League average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's matches and 73% of Shandong Luneng's.
What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and Shandong Luneng in?
Over the last 5 games Chongqing Tongliang Long have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Shandong Luneng 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shandong Luneng?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Shandong Luneng: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.