China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda: match statistics

Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Chongqing Tongliang Long play Tianjin Teda in Chinese Super League (China). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Chongqing Tongliang Long: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tianjin Teda: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.21 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. Tianjin Teda scores 1.33 and concedes 1.22. League average: 3.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Chongqing Tongliang Long 58%, Tianjin Teda 56%. Over 2.5: Chongqing Tongliang Long 37%, Tianjin Teda 50%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Tianjin Teda has higher xG: 1.06 vs 0.98. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 8.7 shots per match, Tianjin Teda: 9.7.

Match halves

Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.79. Tianjin Teda: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Chongqing Tongliang Long: 46-60 (6 goals). Tianjin Teda: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 3.09 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Chongqing Tongliang Long sit 2nd with a record of 6-6-3 and 19 scored vs 16 conceded; Tianjin Teda are 16th (3-6-6) also with 19 goals for but 21 against. In the last 5 matches the home side scored 6 goals, won 2 and average 1.4 points per game, while the visitors scored 5, won 1 and average 1.0 point per game. At home Chongqing records 55% possession, on average 10.13 shots and 4.0 on target per match, a 15% conversion rate and xG 1.17; Tianjin away have 38% possession, 9.86 shots and 3.71 on target, 14% conversion and xG 1.06. The key advantage for the hosts is defence and the quality of chances allowed: at home they concede 1.13 goals on average with xG against 0.99 and 38% clean sheets, whereas the visitors away concede 1.29 goals on average, 1.83 xG against and only 14% clean sheets, and in 29% of away matches the visitors fail to score (vs 13% for the home side). Considering 2nd vs 16th, clear superiority in possession, lower xG against and a smaller share of matches without scoring, I tip a home win; proposed probabilities: home 62%, draw 24%, away 14%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
6Shots13
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
1Shots on target1
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0.65xG1.18
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
2Corners13
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
26Dangerous attacks39
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
9Fouls12
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0Cards2
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
1.21Goals scored / match1.33
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
1.11Goals conceded / match1.22
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
48%Average possession43%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
3.32Shots on target / match3.22
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.68Shots per match9.72
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
3.32Shots on target3.22
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
13.9%Shot conversion13.7%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
48%Possession43%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0.98xG for1.06
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
1.3xG against1.52
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

Shooting quality

Chongqing Tongliang Long: Efficient finishingTianjin Teda: Counter-attacking
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
Accuracy (shots on target)38%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tianjin Teda is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 2 pts / match - Tianjin Teda

Chongqing Tongliang Long
LWLDD
Season result split
37% W42% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-8-4
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Tianjin Teda
DWLWW
Season result split
28% W33% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-7
1.17 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tianjin Teda is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.33 goals / match - Tianjin Teda

Chongqing Tongliang Long is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.22 goals / match - Tianjin Teda

Chongqing Tongliang Long scoring profile: very strong

Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Tianjin Teda keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

Tianjin Teda scoring profile: strong

Tianjin Teda scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).

23Goals scored (season)24
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
21Goals conceded (season)22
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
2.32Average goals in match2.56
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
8Goals conceded (last 5)2
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal78%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
32%2 goals33%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
5%3 goals17%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0%4 goals6%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal72%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
26%2 goals39%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
21%3 goals11%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0%4 goals0%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
Chongqing Tongliang Long - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 19 matches
65%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time17%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0%Scored in both halves22%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
80%BTTS - last 520%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tianjin Teda is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long · 1.44 pts / match - Tianjin Teda

Chongqing Tongliang Long - half-time state
21% leading53% draw26% trailing
Tianjin Teda - half-time state
28% leading61% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)1.44
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.28
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0.84Average goals (1st half)0.78
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
68%Clean sheet before half-time72%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
74%No goal before half-time56%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.78
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
53%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda
42%No goal after half-time44%
Chongqing Tongliang LongTianjin Teda

Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results

42% W32% R26% P
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tianjin Teda - second-half results

17% W50% R33% P
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chongqing Tongliang Long - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Tianjin Teda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Chongqing Tongliang Long
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Tianjin Teda
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Chongqing Tongliang Long

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Tianjin Teda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.83
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Chongqing Tongliang LongLigaTianjin Teda
Average goals in match 2.323.09 2.56
Both teams scored 58%65% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%59% 50%
Clean sheets 37%19% 28%
Goal before half-time 53%70% 56%
Goal after half-time 84%89% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per match
65%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.30
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Chongqing Tongliang Long 0 - 1 - 0 Tianjin Teda. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda?

The Chinese Super League match finished Chongqing Tongliang Long 1:0 Tianjin Teda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda?

Chongqing Tongliang Long score 1.21 goals per game on average and Tianjin Teda 1.33. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's matches and 56% of Tianjin Teda's.

What form are Chongqing Tongliang Long and Tianjin Teda in?

Over the last 5 games Chongqing Tongliang Long have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tianjin Teda 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chongqing Tongliang Long vs Tianjin Teda?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.