Chrobry Głogów vs Stal Mielec: match statistics
Chrobry Głogów vs Stal Mielec: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Chrobry Głogów played against Stal Mielec in 1. Liga (Poland). The game was played on April 17, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Chrobry Głogów has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Stal Mielec has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Chrobry Głogów scores 1.39 goals per game and allows 0.96. Stal Mielec scores 1.43 and allows 1.89. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of Chrobry Głogów's games and 71% of Stal Mielec's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 71%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chrobry Głogów has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.46 per game. Chrobry Głogów takes 13.5 shots per game, while Stal Mielec takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Chrobry Głogów leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Stal Mielec leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.82 after halftime.
When the teams score
Chrobry Głogów's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Stal Mielec, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chrobry Głogów has a clear home and defensive edge: at home they concede on average 1.0 goal per match and keep a clean sheet in 29% of games, while Stal Mielec concede on average 2.14 goals per away match and have only 14% clean sheets. In attack the numbers are closer — Chrobry score 1.5 goals per home game with an average xG of 1.71, whereas Stal score 1.36 away with xG 1.42; total goals this season are 39 for Chrobry and 40 for Stal. Additionally the hosts generate more chances: 5.14 shots on target and 14.21 total shots at home versus 3.79 and 11.71 for the visitors, with similar conversion rates (11% vs 12%), which points to more high-quality opportunities for Chrobry. However, Stal’s form must be considered — in the last 5 matches they have scored 13 goals and won 4 of 5, with an average of 2.4 points in that period versus Chrobry’s 1.4, increasing the visitors’ goal threat. Based on the defensive advantage, superior xG and shot volume, I predict a home win; probabilities: 60% for 1, 22% for draw, 18% for Stal victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high BTTS rates: Chrobry 79% and Stal 64% versus a league average of 65%, strongly favoring a Both Teams To Score scenario. Stal concedes 2.14 goals per match compared to Chrobry’s 1.64, and Stal’s goal record is 40 scored and 53 conceded, so Stal more frequently allows opponents to score. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of Chrobry’s games and 80% of Stal’s, with goal averages of 1.4 (Chrobry) and 2.6 (Stal), indicating both teams regularly score and concede. xG values confirm this picture: attack xG 1.51 (Chrobry) vs 1.42 (Stal) and xG against 1.6 vs 1.85, meaning both sides create and give up goal-scoring chances. With only 14% clean sheets between the two teams, 86% of Chrobry’s home matches over 2.5 goals and a league average of 2.94 goals, I recommend BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have a very high share of matches with over 1.5 goals: Chrobry 93% and Stal 93%, which is the strongest signal for Over 1.5. Average xG is 1.51 for the home side and 1.42 for the visitors, and Stal concedes on average 1.85 xG, hence a projected 1.68 goals for Chrobry and 1.51 for Stal (total 3.19). Additionally, average shots on target are 3.43 (Chrobry) and 3.79 (Stal), and the percentage of matches in which both teams scored is 79% and 64%, respectively, which increases the probability of further goals. As a result, the strongest and most reliable pick is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 has a moderate chance (~73%) due to Chrobry’s 86% Over 2.5 rate and Stal’s 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 average). Over 3.5 appears less likely (~35%) because seasonal Over 3.5 rates are 43% (Chrobry) and 29% (Stal), and the combined xG does not provide sufficient buffer.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Chrobry holds the advantage at Half-Time: the hosts led at the break in 6 matches (43% of cases), averaging 0.79 goals by Half-Time versus Stal’s 0.43. The hosts have accumulated 22 points at Half-Time, averaging 1.57 points per match at the break, while Stal has 12 points and averages 0.86 points per match at Half-Time, supporting a scenario of Chrobry leading at the Half-Time mark. However, Stal is dangerous after the break: in the last 5 matches the visitors won the second half in 80% of cases and scored an average of 1.0 goals after Half-Time, so they have a realistic chance of making a turnaround. xG is similar (1.51 for Chrobry versus 1.42 for Stal), but Stal concedes more goals over the season (2.14 on average versus the hosts’ 1.64), which argues for Chrobry maintaining the lead; therefore the most reliable signal is 1/1, although 1/2 and X/2 remain material risks.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Chrobry Głogów | Stal Mielec | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Stal Mielec is 71% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Chrobry Głogów · 2.4 pts / game - Stal Mielec
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chrobry Głogów is 97% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.96 goals / game - Chrobry Głogów · 1.89 goals / game - Stal Mielec
Chrobry Głogów scores in 82% of games (23 of 28 meczów), while Stal Mielec keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 meczów).
Stal Mielec scores in 82% of games (23 of 28 meczów), while Chrobry Głogów keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Chrobry Głogów
Over / Under - Stal Mielec
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chrobry Głogów is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.39 pts / game - Chrobry Głogów · 1.21 pts / game - Stal Mielec
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Chrobry Głogów - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Stal Mielec - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Chrobry Głogów
Stal Mielec
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Chrobry Głogów | Liga | Stal Mielec | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.36 | 2.94 | ▲ 3.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 65% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 20% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 73% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 80% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Chrobry Głogów's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Stal Mielec. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Chrobry Głogów vs Stal Mielec?
The 1. Liga match finished Chrobry Głogów 2:1 Stal Mielec. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Chrobry Głogów vs Stal Mielec?
Chrobry Głogów score 1.39 goals per game on average and Stal Mielec 1.43. The 1. Liga average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Chrobry Głogów's matches and 71% of Stal Mielec's.
What form are Chrobry Głogów and Stal Mielec in?
Over the last 5 games Chrobry Głogów have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Stal Mielec 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Chrobry Głogów vs Stal Mielec?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


