Città di Campobasso vs Arezzo: match statistics
Arezzo displays significantly better form and statistics this season, which translates into an advantage in this clash. The visitors have won 19 of 28 matches this season with an impressive goal difference of 48:19, while Città di Campobasso has secured only 12 victories with a record of 40:34. In away matches, Arezzo wins a staggering 64% of the time, maintaining a clean sheet in 57% of cases and averaging 1.79 goals scored against just 0.64 conceded. The form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (2.0 PPG vs 1.8 PPG for the hosts). Despite decent results at home (54% wins), Città di Campobasso concedes an average of one goal per match and has lower xG metrics, suggesting lower efficiency. Considering all parameters, Arezzo has a clear qualitative advantage and form that should bring them the full points.
Città di Campobasso vs Arezzo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Città di Campobasso played against Arezzo in Serie C Group B (Italy). The game was played on March 9, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Città di Campobasso has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Arezzo has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Città di Campobasso scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 1.21. Arezzo scores 1.71 and allows 0.68. Games in this league average 2.26 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of Città di Campobasso's games and 43% of Arezzo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 43%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Arezzo has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.36 per game. Città di Campobasso takes 11.4 shots per game, while Arezzo takes 14.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Città di Campobasso leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.96 goals per game after halftime. Arezzo leads at halftime in 32% and scores 1.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
Città di Campobasso's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Arezzo, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group B games average 2.26 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Arezzo displays significantly better form and statistics this season, which translates into an advantage in this clash. The visitors have won 19 of 28 matches this season with an impressive goal difference of 48:19, while Città di Campobasso has secured only 12 victories with a record of 40:34. In away matches, Arezzo wins a staggering 64% of the time, maintaining a clean sheet in 57% of cases and averaging 1.79 goals scored against just 0.64 conceded. The form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (2.0 PPG vs 1.8 PPG for the hosts). Despite decent results at home (54% wins), Città di Campobasso concedes an average of one goal per match and has lower xG metrics, suggesting lower efficiency. Considering all parameters, Arezzo has a clear qualitative advantage and form that should bring them the full points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Città di Campobasso | Arezzo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Arezzo is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Città di Campobasso · 2 pts / game - Arezzo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arezzo is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
1.43 goals / game - Città di Campobasso · 1.71 goals / game - Arezzo
Arezzo is 78% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.21 goals / game - Città di Campobasso · 0.68 goals / game - Arezzo
Città di Campobasso scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while Arezzo keeps a clean sheet in 54% (15 of 28 meczów).
Arezzo scores in 89% of games (25 of 28 meczów), while Città di Campobasso keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Città di Campobasso
Over / Under - Arezzo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arezzo is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / game - Città di Campobasso · 1.36 pts / game - Arezzo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Città di Campobasso - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Arezzo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 68%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Città di Campobasso
Arezzo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Città di Campobasso | Liga | Arezzo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.64 | 2.26 | ▲ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 49% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 30% | ▲ 54% |
| Goal before half-time | • 64% | 63% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 71% | • 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Città di Campobasso's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Arezzo. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Città di Campobasso vs Arezzo?
The Serie C Group B match finished Città di Campobasso 0:1 Arezzo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Città di Campobasso vs Arezzo?
Città di Campobasso score 1.43 goals per game on average and Arezzo 1.71. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Città di Campobasso's matches and 43% of Arezzo's.
What form are Città di Campobasso and Arezzo in?
Over the last 5 games Città di Campobasso have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Arezzo 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Città di Campobasso vs Arezzo?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.