Cittadella vs Inter II: match statistics
Cittadella presents decidedly better form in the last five matches, earning 2 points per match and recording a 3-1-1 record, while Inter II has just 0.6 points per match with a 0-3-2 streak. The hosts win 43% of matches at home and have a positive goal difference of +5 on their own stadium, constituting a solid basis for achieving victory. Inter II, despite a decent away record over the whole season (53% wins), is in a clear crisis of form without a victory in the last five meetings. Cittadella also disposes of an advantage in possession (54% vs 45%) and better expected goals in home matches (1.48 xG). Taking into account the current form of both teams and the hosts' home statistics, Cittadella has real chances of gaining three points, though a draw cannot be ruled out due to the high percentage of point splitting by the hosts (36%).
Cittadella vs Inter II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Cittadella played against Inter II in Serie C Group A (Italy). The game was played on March 3, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Cittadella has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Inter II has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Cittadella scores 1.21 goals per game and allows 1.10. Inter II scores 1.14 and allows 1.03. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Cittadella's games and 55% of Inter II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 38%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Inter II has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.47 per game. Cittadella takes 11.3 shots per game, while Inter II takes 11.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Cittadella leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Inter II leads at halftime in 34% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
Cittadella's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Inter II, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group A games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cittadella presents decidedly better form in the last five matches, earning 2 points per match and recording a 3-1-1 record, while Inter II has just 0.6 points per match with a 0-3-2 streak. The hosts win 43% of matches at home and have a positive goal difference of +5 on their own stadium, constituting a solid basis for achieving victory. Inter II, despite a decent away record over the whole season (53% wins), is in a clear crisis of form without a victory in the last five meetings. Cittadella also disposes of an advantage in possession (54% vs 45%) and better expected goals in home matches (1.48 xG). Taking into account the current form of both teams and the hosts' home statistics, Cittadella has real chances of gaining three points, though a draw cannot be ruled out due to the high percentage of point splitting by the hosts (36%).
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Cittadella | Inter II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cittadella is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Cittadella · 0.6 pts / game - Inter II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cittadella is 6% better for: goals scored per game.
1.21 goals / game - Cittadella · 1.14 goals / game - Inter II
Inter II is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Cittadella · 1.03 goals / game - Inter II
Cittadella scores in 72% of games (21 of 29 meczów), while Inter II keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 meczów).
Inter II scores in 72% of games (21 of 29 meczów), while Cittadella keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Cittadella
Over / Under - Inter II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Inter II is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Cittadella · 1.41 pts / game - Inter II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Cittadella - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Inter II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 34% of games and wins 34%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Cittadella
Inter II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).
Teams vs league
| Cittadella | Liga | Inter II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.31 | 2.27 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | • 48% | 49% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 41% | 41% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | • 31% | 30% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 48% | 65% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | • 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Cittadella's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Inter II. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Cittadella vs Inter II?
The Serie C Group A match finished Cittadella 1:1 Inter II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Cittadella vs Inter II?
Cittadella score 1.21 goals per game on average and Inter II 1.14. The Serie C Group A average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Cittadella's matches and 55% of Inter II's.
What form are Cittadella and Inter II in?
Over the last 5 games Cittadella have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Inter II 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cittadella vs Inter II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.