Clermont vs Guingamp: match statistics
Clermont vs Guingamp: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Clermont played against Guingamp in Ligue 2 (France). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Clermont has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Guingamp has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Clermont scores 1.12 goals per game and allows 1.33. Guingamp scores 1.27 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.51 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of Clermont's games and 52% of Guingamp's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 58%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Guingamp has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.14 per game. Clermont takes 10.4 shots per game, while Guingamp takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Clermont leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Guingamp leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Clermont's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For Guingamp, it is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligue 2 games average 2.51 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Clermont to win (1). In their last 5 matches the home side scored 7 goals and recorded 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, averaging 1.2 points per game, while Guingamp in their last 5 fixtures have scored only 4 goals and sit on 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, averaging 0.2 points per game. Defensively the hosts are a clearer strength — Clermont concede 1.13 goals per home game versus Guingamp’s 1.63 away (difference ~0.5 goals), with xG against 1.28 vs 1.39. Offensively the visitors do have some merits: 4.06 shots on target and a 13% conversion rate compared to 3.75 and 10% for Clermont, and average attacking xG figures are similar (1.31 vs 1.29), indicating they can capitalize on chances. Taking into account Clermont’s better form, the lower goals conceded at home and the home goal-difference of 0, I give a slight edge to the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators strongly support BTTS: Guingamp has a seasonal BTTS of 69% versus 35% for Clermont, while the league average BTTS is 52%. In the last 5 matches Clermont had BTTS in 80% (scoring 1.4 and conceding 1.4 on average), and Guingamp 60% (scoring 0.8 and conceding 1.6), which shows a recent tendency for both teams to find the net. xG and shot metrics reinforce this picture — Clermont generates 1.47 xG and 13.12 shots per match versus 1.31 xG and 11.38 shots for Guingamp, and both teams allow significant opponent xG (1.18 for Clermont and 1.39 for Guingamp). Additionally, Guingamp has only 19% clean sheets on the road, while Clermont keeps 35% clean sheets at home, indicating Guingamp rarely avoids conceding. Based on this I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% versus 30% for No BTTS and recommend a "BTTS - Yes" bet as the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated expected goals are about 1.43 for Clermont (xG attack 1.47 and xG conceded by opponents 1.39 -> (1.47+1.39)/2=1.43) and 1.25 for Guingamp ((1.31+1.18)/2=1.25), totaling ~2.68 goals. Seasonal shares show Clermont matches exceeded 1.5 goals in 65% of cases and Guingamp in 75% — average 70%, hence a strong signal for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line seasonal values are 47% (Clermont) and 69% (Guingamp), average 58%; with expected 2.68 goals this is a moderate signal for Over 2.5 (approx. 58%). The 3.5 line has weaker support: 24%/44% -> average 34%, so Under 3.5 looks more likely. The strongest recommendation from the data is Over 1.5 (approx. 70%), therefore I pick the Over side on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Clermont led at half-time in 35% of their matches this season, and in the last 5 home games the hosts led at the break in 40% of cases, indicating their first-half advantage. Clermont posts higher xG (1.47 vs 1.31 for Guingamp) and better limits defensive risk (xG conceded 1.18 vs 1.39 for Guingamp), therefore creating more high-quality chances and conceding fewer. Additionally, when Clermont led at the break this season they held the lead until full-time in 65% of cases, reinforcing the conversion of an HT lead into a win. Despite Guingamp’s season average goals of 1.44 vs Clermont’s 1.12, they are poor on the road (0% wins and 80% losses in the last 5 away matches), and although they score an average of 0.81 goals after the break versus the hosts’ 0.53, this does not compensate for the lack of form. On that basis I select 1/1 as the strongest signal and assign it a 26% probability, distributing the remainder of outcomes proportionally (including 1/X 8% and X/X 14%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Clermont | Guingamp | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Clermont is 500% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Clermont · 0.2 pts / game - Guingamp
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guingamp is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.12 goals / game - Clermont · 1.27 goals / game - Guingamp
Clermont is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Clermont · 1.45 goals / game - Guingamp
Clermont scores in 70% of games (23 of 33 meczów), while Guingamp keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 meczów).
Guingamp scores in 70% of games (23 of 33 meczów), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Clermont
Over / Under - Guingamp
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Guingamp is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.12 pts / game - Clermont · 1.21 pts / game - Guingamp
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Clermont - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Guingamp - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Clermont
Guingamp
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).
Teams vs league
| Clermont | Liga | Guingamp | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.45 | 2.51 | ▲ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 52% | • 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 48% | 47% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 30% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 66% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Clermont's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Guingamp. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Clermont vs Guingamp?
The Ligue 2 match finished Clermont 1:0 Guingamp. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Clermont vs Guingamp?
Clermont score 1.12 goals per game on average and Guingamp 1.27. The Ligue 2 average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Clermont's matches and 52% of Guingamp's.
What form are Clermont and Guingamp in?
Over the last 5 games Clermont have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Guingamp 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clermont vs Guingamp?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


