France - Ligue 2Data current as of 22 July 2026

Clermont vs Laval: match statistics

Clermont crest
Clermont
4 : 1half-time 1:0
Laval crest
Laval
135%(2.34)
X35%(2.85)
230%(2.92)

Statistical analysis points to a highly balanced match between two teams in similar form. Clermont displays stability at home with a 50% draw rate and an average of 1 goal scored and conceded per game; however, a low conversion rate (9%) and xG (1.26) suggest issues with finalization. Laval has shown better overall form in the last 5 matches (1.8 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts), netting 10 goals, but struggles on the road—failing to score in 44% of matches with a low xG (0.95). A key factor is Clermont's possession advantage (56% vs 47%), yet given their low scoring efficiency, this may not suffice to secure a win. Considering the hosts' tendency to draw (50% of home matches) and the even strength of both sides, a sharing of the points is the most likely outcome.

Clermont vs Laval: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Clermont play Laval in Ligue 2 (France). The match date is 3 January 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Clermont: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Laval: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Clermont scores 1.12 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Laval scores 0.88 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Clermont 59%, Laval 44%. Over 2.5: Clermont 47%, Laval 38%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Clermont has higher xG: 1.17 vs 1.13. Clermont: 10.7 shots per match, Laval: 8.9.

Match halves

Clermont: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68. Laval: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.41.

Goals by minute

Clermont: 46-60 (9 goals). Laval: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis points to a highly balanced match between two teams in similar form. Clermont displays stability at home with a 50% draw rate and an average of 1 goal scored and conceded per game; however, a low conversion rate (9%) and xG (1.26) suggest issues with finalization. Laval has shown better overall form in the last 5 matches (1.8 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts), netting 10 goals, but struggles on the road—failing to score in 44% of matches with a low xG (0.95). A key factor is Clermont's possession advantage (56% vs 47%), yet given their low scoring efficiency, this may not suffice to secure a win. Considering the hosts' tendency to draw (50% of home matches) and the even strength of both sides, a sharing of the points is the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
ClermontLaval
13Shots7
ClermontLaval
7Shots on target0
ClermontLaval
1.62xG0.67
ClermontLaval
1Corners4
ClermontLaval
41Dangerous attacks29
ClermontLaval
14Fouls20
ClermontLaval
0Cards2
ClermontLaval

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.12Goals scored / match0.88
ClermontLaval
1.29Goals conceded / match1.41
ClermontLaval
50%Average possession46%
ClermontLaval
3.35Shots on target / match3.47
ClermontLaval

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.68Shots per match8.91
ClermontLaval
3.35Shots on target3.47
ClermontLaval
10.5%Shot conversion9.9%
ClermontLaval
50%Possession46%
ClermontLaval
1.17xG for1.13
ClermontLaval
1.44xG against1.46
ClermontLaval

Shooting quality

Clermont: BalancedLaval: Balanced
ClermontLaval
Accuracy (shots on target)31%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Clermont
DLDWW
Season result split
26% W29% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-15
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-6
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Laval
DWDLW
Season result split
18% W41% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-14-14
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Clermont is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Clermont · 0.88 goals / match - Laval

Clermont is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Clermont · 1.41 goals / match - Laval

Clermont scoring profile: very strong

Clermont scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while Laval keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).

Laval scoring profile: strong

Laval scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

38Goals scored (season)30
ClermontLaval
44Goals conceded (season)48
ClermontLaval
2.41Average goals in match2.29
ClermontLaval
6Goals scored (last 5)6
ClermontLaval
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
ClermontLaval

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal53%
ClermontLaval
32%2 goals29%
ClermontLaval
6%3 goals6%
ClermontLaval
3%4 goals0%
ClermontLaval

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal76%
ClermontLaval
32%2 goals41%
ClermontLaval
9%3 goals15%
ClermontLaval
6%4 goals9%
ClermontLaval

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time9%
ClermontLaval
3%BTTS in both halves3%
ClermontLaval
9%Scored in both halves18%
ClermontLaval

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
ClermontLaval
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
ClermontLaval
60%BTTS - last 540%
ClermontLaval

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
ClermontLaval
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
ClermontLaval
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
ClermontLaval

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
ClermontLaval
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
ClermontLaval
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
ClermontLaval

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Laval is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.12 pts / match - Clermont · 1.21 pts / match - Laval

Clermont - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing
Laval - half-time state
26% leading41% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.12Points per match (1st half)1.21
ClermontLaval
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.47
ClermontLaval
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
ClermontLaval
1.06Average goals (1st half)1.03
ClermontLaval
56%Clean sheet before half-time62%
ClermontLaval
68%No goal before half-time65%
ClermontLaval

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)0.82
ClermontLaval
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
ClermontLaval
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
ClermontLaval
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.26
ClermontLaval
41%Clean sheet after half-time41%
ClermontLaval
53%No goal after half-time65%
ClermontLaval

Clermont - second-half results

32% W29% R38% P
38
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Laval - second-half results

15% W38% R47% P
41
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding69%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Clermont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Laval - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Clermont
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
8
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
9
6
46-60
7
6
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Laval
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
6
8
16-30
8
8
31-45
5
10
46-60
2
8
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.35
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Clermont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Laval

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.66
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

ClermontLigaLaval
Average goals in match 2.412.53 2.29
Both teams scored 59%52% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%47% 38%
Clean sheets 18%30% 24%
Goal before half-time 56%67% 65%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Clermont 0 - 1 - 0 Laval. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Stade Lavallois Mayenne FC
0 : 0
Clermont Foot 63

FAQ

What was the result of Clermont vs Laval?

The Ligue 2 match finished Clermont 4:1 Laval. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Clermont vs Laval?

Clermont score 1.12 goals per game on average and Laval 0.88. The Ligue 2 average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Clermont's matches and 44% of Laval's.

What form are Clermont and Laval in?

Over the last 5 games Clermont have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Laval 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clermont vs Laval?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.