France - Ligue 2Data current as of 22 July 2026

Clermont vs Pau: match statistics

Clermont crest
Clermont
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Pau crest
Pau
135%(2.37)
X35%(3.25)
230%(2.60)

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most probable outcome. Clermont presents solid home form with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% defeats, scoring an average of 1.25 goals per game at home. Pau is slightly more effective offensively on the road (1.67 goals on average per away match) and has a better away win percentage (42%), but their form over the last 5 matches is weaker (0.8 PPG) compared to Clermont (1.2 PPG). The key factor is the defense - Pau concedes an average of 1.67 goals away, which, combined with the hosts' decent offense, could lead to a high-scoring game. Given both teams' similar xG values (Clermont 1.29 vs Pau 1.34) and current form, a draw seems the safest pick, although Clermont's slight edge stems from better recent form and home-field advantage.

Clermont vs Pau: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Clermont play Pau in Ligue 2 (France). The match date is 13 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Clermont: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Pau: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Clermont scores 1.12 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Pau scores 1.41 and concedes 1.82. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Clermont 59%, Pau 56%. Over 2.5: Clermont 47%, Pau 68%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Pau has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.17. Clermont: 10.7 shots per match, Pau: 12.2.

Match halves

Clermont: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.68. Pau: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Clermont: 46-60 (9 goals). Pau: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most probable outcome. Clermont presents solid home form with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% defeats, scoring an average of 1.25 goals per game at home. Pau is slightly more effective offensively on the road (1.67 goals on average per away match) and has a better away win percentage (42%), but their form over the last 5 matches is weaker (0.8 PPG) compared to Clermont (1.2 PPG). The key factor is the defense - Pau concedes an average of 1.67 goals away, which, combined with the hosts' decent offense, could lead to a high-scoring game. Given both teams' similar xG values (Clermont 1.29 vs Pau 1.34) and current form, a draw seems the safest pick, although Clermont's slight edge stems from better recent form and home-field advantage.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
ClermontPau
10Shots8
ClermontPau
3Shots on target3
ClermontPau
1.12xG0.86
ClermontPau
5Corners0
ClermontPau
35Dangerous attacks20
ClermontPau
20Fouls15
ClermontPau
2Cards2
ClermontPau

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.12Goals scored / match1.41
ClermontPau
1.29Goals conceded / match1.82
ClermontPau
50%Average possession52%
ClermontPau
3.35Shots on target / match3.88
ClermontPau

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.68Shots per match12.15
ClermontPau
3.35Shots on target3.88
ClermontPau
10.5%Shot conversion11.6%
ClermontPau
50%Possession52%
ClermontPau
1.17xG for1.35
ClermontPau
1.44xG against1.25
ClermontPau

Shooting quality

Clermont: BalancedPau: Balanced
ClermontPau
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Clermont is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Clermont · 1.2 pts / match - Pau

Clermont
DLDWW
Season result split
26% W29% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-15
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-6
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Pau
WWLLL
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pau is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

1.12 goals / match - Clermont · 1.41 goals / match - Pau

Clermont is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Clermont · 1.82 goals / match - Pau

Clermont scoring profile: strong

Clermont scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while Pau keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Pau scoring profile: very strong

Pau scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

38Goals scored (season)48
ClermontPau
44Goals conceded (season)62
ClermontPau
2.41Average goals in match3.24
ClermontPau
6Goals scored (last 5)8
ClermontPau
5Goals conceded (last 5)14
ClermontPau

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal82%
ClermontPau
32%2 goals41%
ClermontPau
6%3 goals18%
ClermontPau
3%4 goals0%
ClermontPau

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal71%
ClermontPau
32%2 goals53%
ClermontPau
9%3 goals32%
ClermontPau
6%4 goals15%
ClermontPau

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time24%
ClermontPau
3%BTTS in both halves9%
ClermontPau
9%Scored in both halves24%
ClermontPau

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
ClermontPau
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
ClermontPau
60%BTTS - last 580%
ClermontPau

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
ClermontPau
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
ClermontPau
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time32%
ClermontPau

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
ClermontPau
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
ClermontPau
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
ClermontPau

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pau is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.12 pts / match - Clermont · 1.32 pts / match - Pau

Clermont - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing
Pau - half-time state
35% leading26% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.12Points per match (1st half)1.32
ClermontPau
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.82
ClermontPau
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.97
ClermontPau
1.06Average goals (1st half)1.79
ClermontPau
56%Clean sheet before half-time47%
ClermontPau
68%No goal before half-time44%
ClermontPau

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per match (2nd half)1.06
ClermontPau
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
ClermontPau
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
ClermontPau
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.44
ClermontPau
41%Clean sheet after half-time47%
ClermontPau
53%No goal after half-time50%
ClermontPau

Clermont - second-half results

32% W29% R38% P
38
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pau - second-half results

24% W35% R41% P
45
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Clermont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Pau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Clermont
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
8
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
9
6
46-60
7
6
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Pau
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
10
12
16-30
10
11
31-45
7
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
10
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Clermont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Pau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

ClermontLigaPau
Average goals in match 2.412.53 3.24
Both teams scored 59%52% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%47% 68%
Clean sheets 18%30% 29%
Goal before half-time 56%67% 85%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Clermont 0 - 0 - 1 Pau. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Pau FC
3 : 1
Clermont Foot 63

FAQ

What was the result of Clermont vs Pau?

The Ligue 2 match finished Clermont 0:1 Pau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Clermont vs Pau?

Clermont score 1.12 goals per game on average and Pau 1.41. The Ligue 2 average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Clermont's matches and 56% of Pau's.

What form are Clermont and Pau in?

Over the last 5 games Clermont have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Pau 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Clermont vs Pau?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.