Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipSolitudeData current as of August 30, 2026

Cliftonville vs Dungannon Swifts: match statistics

Cliftonville vs Dungannon Swifts: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Cliftonville played against Dungannon Swifts in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Solitude. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Cliftonville has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Dungannon Swifts has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Cliftonville scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 0.67. Dungannon Swifts scores 1.33 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.41 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Cliftonville's games and 33% of Dungannon Swifts's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 33%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Dungannon Swifts has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.43 per game. Cliftonville takes 12.7 shots per game, while Dungannon Swifts takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Cliftonville leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Dungannon Swifts leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Cliftonville's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Dungannon Swifts, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NIFL Premiership games average 2.41 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dungannon Swifts are in slightly better current form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches, while Cliftonville have won 2 and lost 3. The visitors are yet to concede away from home, keeping a clean sheet in 100% of their matches and allowing opponents just 0.99 xG, which is a clear contrast to the 1.52 xG conceded by Cliftonville at home. Dungannon’s attack produces an average of 1.69 xG away from home and registers 7 shots on target per match, compared with the hosts’ 1.40 xG and 6 shots on target. Cliftonville have the advantage in possession at 61% and score an average of 2 goals at home, but their lack of clean sheets and weaker recent form increase the visitors’ chances of success, given their superior defensive efficiency.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both sides to score is primarily driven by current form: in their last 5 matches, both Cliftonville and Dungannon Swifts recorded BTTS in 60% of games. During this period, both teams averaged 1.4 goals scored per match, while Cliftonville conceded 1.8 goals per game and Dungannon Swifts 1.4. The hosts have a high average xG against them of 2.03, while the visitors create an average of 1.69 xG and produce as many as 7.0 shots on target per match. On the other hand, Dungannon Swifts kept a clean sheet in 100% of their away matches so far, which clearly lowers confidence in the pick. Although the league BTTS rate is only 38%, the current offensive and defensive numbers of both teams give a slight edge to the scenario in which each team scores at least once.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The last five matches for both teams produced an average of 1.4 goals scored, while Cliftonville conceded as many as 1.8 goals per game during this period. Cliftonville’s matches went Over 2.5 goals in 80% of their last five outings, compared with 60% for Dungannon Swifts, while both teams scored in 60% of matches for each side. The visitors generate a solid volume of chances, averaging 14 shots and 7 on target, with a season xG of 1.69. At the same time, Dungannon’s defense kept clean sheets in both of their league matches so far, which reduces confidence in Over 2.5 despite the high tempo shown in their recent form. The strongest selection is therefore Over 1.5, as both teams scored at least one goal in 100% of their matches so far, while the projected 2.45 goals clearly supports a minimum of two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Dungannon Swifts have started the season with maximum points, winning 100% of their matches and yet to concede a goal, while Cliftonville average 1.5 goals scored and concede the same number. The visitors have a clearly stronger chance-creation profile: their average xG stands at 1.69 compared with the hosts’ 1.58, while Cliftonville allow opponents an xG as high as 2.03, compared with just 0.99 for Dungannon. In the current data, Dungannon led at the break in 100% of their matches and scored an average of 1.0 goal before half-time, whereas the hosts were trailing after 45 minutes in 50% of their games. The last five matches have been more evenly balanced, but Dungannon won 60% of them compared with Cliftonville’s 40%, so the most likely scenario remains a Dungannon lead at half-time followed by an away win at full-time: HT/FT 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
5Shots13
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
1Shots on target5
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0.68xG1.54
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
5Corners3
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
39Dangerous attacks49
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
7Fouls6
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
2Cards1
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
1.67Goals scored / game1.33
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0.67Goals allowed / game1
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
57%Average possession45%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
4.67Shots on target / game4.67
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.67Shots per game13.33
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
4.67Shots on target4.67
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
13.2%Shot conversion10%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
57%Possession45%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
1.43xG for1.64
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
1.54xG against1.51
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

Shooting quality

Cliftonville: Efficient finishingDungannon Swifts: Balanced
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cliftonville
WWL
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 67%
Dungannon Swifts
LWW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cliftonville is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Cliftonville · 1.33 goals / game - Dungannon Swifts

Cliftonville is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - Cliftonville · 1 goals / game - Dungannon Swifts

Cliftonville scoring profile: mixed

Cliftonville scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Dungannon Swifts keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 meczów).

Dungannon Swifts scoring profile: very strong

Dungannon Swifts scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)4
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
2Goals conceded (season)3
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
2.33Average goals per game2.33
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
5Goals scored (last 5)4
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
67%2 goals33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
33%3 goals0%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0%4 goals0%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0%2 goals33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0%3 goals33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0%4 goals0%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0%BTTS in both halves0%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
67%Scored in both halves33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
33%BTTS - last 533%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cliftonville is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.33 pts / game - Cliftonville · 2 pts / game - Dungannon Swifts

Cliftonville - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing
Dungannon Swifts - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.33Points per game (1st half)2
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
1Goals scored (1st half)0.67
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
1Average goals (1st half)1
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
100%Clean sheet before half-time67%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
33%No goal before half-time33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.33
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts
33%No goal after half-time33%
CliftonvilleDungannon Swifts

Cliftonville - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Dungannon Swifts - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cliftonville - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.331.33
Goals scored / game1.00.7
Goals allowed / game0.00.7
Average goals per game1.01.3
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Dungannon Swifts - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.33
Goals scored / game0.70.7
Goals allowed / game0.30.7
Average goals per game1.01.3
1 goal100%67%
2 goals0%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Dungannon Swifts
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.87
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Dungannon Swifts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

CliftonvilleLigaDungannon Swifts
Average goals per game 2.332.41 2.33
Both teams scored 33%35% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%53% 33%
Clean sheets 33%35% 67%
Goal before half-time 67%65% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%82% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per game
35%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.00
Home goals / game
1.41
Away goals / game
+-29%
Home attack advantage
+-41%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Dungannon SwiftsYellow cardTiernan Kelly
  2. CliftonvilleRed cardHarry Wilson
  3. Dungannon SwiftsSubstitutionOn: Leonel Alves dos SantosOff: Gaël Bigirimana
  4. CliftonvilleSubstitutionOn: Matthew BelshawOff: Peter Morrison
  5. Dungannon SwiftsGoalKealan Dillon
  6. Dungannon SwiftsSubstitutionOn: Corey SmithOff: Tiernan Kelly
  7. Dungannon SwiftsGoalSean McAllister

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Cliftonville's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Dungannon Swifts. Games average 2.80 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

Cliftonville FC
1 : 2
Dungannon Swifts FC
Cliftonville FC
1 : 0
Dungannon Swifts FC
Dungannon Swifts FC
3 : 2
Cliftonville FC
Cliftonville FC
2 : 0
Dungannon Swifts FC
Dungannon Swifts FC
2 : 1
Cliftonville FC

FAQ

What was the result of Cliftonville vs Dungannon Swifts?

The NIFL Premiership match finished Cliftonville 0:2 Dungannon Swifts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Cliftonville and Dungannon Swifts?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Cliftonville won 2, Dungannon Swifts won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Cliftonville vs Dungannon Swifts?

Cliftonville score 1.67 goals per game on average and Dungannon Swifts 1.33. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Cliftonville's matches and 33% of Dungannon Swifts's.

What form are Cliftonville and Dungannon Swifts in?

Over the last 5 games Cliftonville have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Dungannon Swifts 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Cliftonville vs Dungannon Swifts?

The statistical background for Cliftonville vs Dungannon Swifts — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.