Belgium - First Division BData current as of September 13, 2026

Club Brugge II vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

Club Brugge II crest
Club Brugge II
1 : 0half-time 0:0
RFC Seraing crest
RFC Seraing
135%(2.31)
X40%(3.30)
225%(2.90)

Analysis points to a balanced meeting between two teams from the bottom part of the table struggling with efficiency problems. Club Brugge II presents poor home form with a 64% loss rate and barely 18% wins at their own stadium, although their last two matches ended in victory. RFC Seraing has not won a single away match this season (0% wins), but has ended as many as 50% of meetings in a draw, indicating a defensive approach. Both teams have a negative goal difference and high FTS% indicators (45% for the hosts, 60% for the visitors), suggesting low offensive effectiveness. Taking into account the poor form of both squads, similar xG values, and the visitors' history of draws on the road, a sharing of points seems the most probable result, though the hosts hold a slight advantage thanks to recent victories and playing at home.

Club Brugge II vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Club Brugge II played against RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on January 30, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Club Brugge II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. RFC Seraing has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Club Brugge II scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.62. RFC Seraing scores 1.00 and allows 1.55. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 57% of Club Brugge II's games and 55% of RFC Seraing's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 50%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

RFC Seraing has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.36 per game. Club Brugge II takes 11.9 shots per game, while RFC Seraing takes 12.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Club Brugge II leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.76 goals per game after halftime. RFC Seraing leads at halftime in 5% and scores 0.70 after halftime.

When the teams score

Club Brugge II's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For RFC Seraing, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Analysis points to a balanced meeting between two teams from the bottom part of the table struggling with efficiency problems. Club Brugge II presents poor home form with a 64% loss rate and barely 18% wins at their own stadium, although their last two matches ended in victory. RFC Seraing has not won a single away match this season (0% wins), but has ended as many as 50% of meetings in a draw, indicating a defensive approach. Both teams have a negative goal difference and high FTS% indicators (45% for the hosts, 60% for the visitors), suggesting low offensive effectiveness. Taking into account the poor form of both squads, similar xG values, and the visitors' history of draws on the road, a sharing of points seems the most probable result, though the hosts hold a slight advantage thanks to recent victories and playing at home.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
13Shots13
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
5Shots on target3
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
1.46xG1.41
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
1Corners7
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
39Dangerous attacks53
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
11Fouls16
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
0Cards1
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
1Goals scored / game1
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
1.62Goals allowed / game1.55
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
57%Average possession42%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
4.14Shots on target / game4
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.95Shots per game12.4
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
4.14Shots on target4
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
8.4%Shot conversion8.1%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
57%Possession42%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
1.36xG for1.37
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
1.69xG against1.47
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

Club Brugge II: BalancedRFC Seraing: Balanced
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)35%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Club Brugge II is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Club Brugge II · 1 pts / game - RFC Seraing

Club Brugge II
LLLWW
Season result split
14% W19% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-14
0.62 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-7
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
RFC Seraing
LLWDD
Season result split
15% W40% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-9
0.85 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-5
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RFC Seraing is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.62 goals / game - Club Brugge II · 1.55 goals / game - RFC Seraing

Club Brugge II scoring profile: very strong

Club Brugge II scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 meczów), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 meczów).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: very strong

RFC Seraing scores in 60% of games (12 of 20 meczów), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 21 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)20
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
34Goals conceded (season)31
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
2.62Average goals per game2.55
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal60%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
24%2 goals30%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
10%3 goals10%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
0%4 goals0%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal80%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
52%2 goals50%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
14%3 goals15%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
5%4 goals5%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time25%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
14%Scored in both halves15%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
20%BTTS - last 560%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Club Brugge II is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / game - Club Brugge II · 0.65 pts / game - RFC Seraing

Club Brugge II - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
5% leading50% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per game (1st half)0.65
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
0.24Goals scored (1st half)0.3
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
0.95Average goals (1st half)1.15
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
48%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
76%No goal before half-time70%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per game (2nd half)1.15
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
33%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing
43%No goal after half-time55%
Club Brugge IIRFC Seraing

Club Brugge II - second-half results

19% W48% D33% L
18
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

25% W40% D35% L
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 15%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Club Brugge II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
RFC Seraing - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.60
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game1.20.2
Average goals per game1.61.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Club Brugge II
ScoredConceded
1
7
0-15
4
3
16-30
0
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
10
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
2
8
31-45
4
4
46-60
4
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Club Brugge II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Club Brugge IILigaRFC Seraing
Average goals per game 2.622.76 2.55
Both teams scored 57%53% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%51% 50%
Clean sheets 10%27% 20%
Goal before half-time 67%72% 65%
Goal after half-time 81%78% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Club Brugge IIGoalTian KorenAssist: Lucas Delorge Knieper
  2. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Akpa Chukwu HemsleyOff: Djibril Diarra
  3. Club Brugge IISubstitutionOn: Jano WillemsOff: Tobias Jensen Lund
  4. RFC SeraingYellow cardThiago Paulo da Silva

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jasper VitseMatches officiated: 19
3.05Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins26%Draws32%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Club Brugge II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against RFC Seraing. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Club Brugge II vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished Club Brugge II 1:0 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Club Brugge II vs RFC Seraing?

Club Brugge II score 1.00 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 1.00. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Club Brugge II's matches and 55% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are Club Brugge II and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games Club Brugge II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Brugge II vs RFC Seraing?

The statistical background for Club Brugge II vs RFC Seraing — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.