Club Brugge II vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Club Brugge II play RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 17 December 2025 at 20:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Club Brugge II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Club Brugge II scores 1.03 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. RWDM scores 1.56 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Club Brugge II 56%, RWDM 63%. Over 2.5: Club Brugge II 56%, RWDM 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Club Brugge II has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.33. Club Brugge II: 11.7 shots per match, RWDM: 11.5.

Match halves

Club Brugge II: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.78. RWDM: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84.

Goals by minute

Club Brugge II: 61-75 (10 goals). RWDM: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Club Brugge IIRWDM
15Shots15
Club Brugge IIRWDM
5Shots on target2
Club Brugge IIRWDM
1.51xG1.35
Club Brugge IIRWDM
4Corners4
Club Brugge IIRWDM
30Dangerous attacks38
Club Brugge IIRWDM
16Fouls18
Club Brugge IIRWDM
4Cards5
Club Brugge IIRWDM

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Club Brugge IIRWDM
1.03Goals scored / match1.56
Club Brugge IIRWDM
1.72Goals conceded / match1.69
Club Brugge IIRWDM
56%Average possession48%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
4.03Shots on target / match4.38
Club Brugge IIRWDM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.69Shots per match11.5
Club Brugge IIRWDM
4.03Shots on target4.38
Club Brugge IIRWDM
8.8%Shot conversion13.6%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
56%Possession48%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
1.34xG for1.33
Club Brugge IIRWDM
1.83xG against1.54
Club Brugge IIRWDM

Shooting quality

Club Brugge II: BalancedRWDM: Efficient finishing
Club Brugge IIRWDM
Accuracy (shots on target)34%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Club Brugge II is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Club Brugge II · 0.8 pts / match - RWDM

Club Brugge II
DDLLW
Season result split
16% W19% R66% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-21
0.66 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-10
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 2.35BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
RWDM
LDLWL
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

1.03 goals / match - Club Brugge II · 1.56 goals / match - RWDM

Club Brugge II scoring profile: very strong

Club Brugge II scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 32 matches).

33Goals scored (season)50
Club Brugge IIRWDM
55Goals conceded (season)54
Club Brugge IIRWDM
2.75Average goals in match3.25
Club Brugge IIRWDM
5Goals scored (last 5)8
Club Brugge IIRWDM
6Goals conceded (last 5)11
Club Brugge IIRWDM

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal81%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
28%2 goals50%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
6%3 goals19%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
0%4 goals3%
Club Brugge IIRWDM

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal78%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
56%2 goals53%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
22%3 goals31%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
6%4 goals6%
Club Brugge IIRWDM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time25%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
6%BTTS in both halves13%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
13%Scored in both halves34%
Club Brugge IIRWDM

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Club Brugge IIRWDM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Club Brugge IIRWDM

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Club Brugge IIRWDM

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM is 74% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.81 pts / match - Club Brugge II · 1.41 pts / match - RWDM

Club Brugge II - half-time state
13% leading44% draw44% trailing
RWDM - half-time state
34% leading38% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.81Points per match (1st half)1.41
Club Brugge IIRWDM
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.72
Club Brugge IIRWDM
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
Club Brugge IIRWDM
0.94Average goals (1st half)1.38
Club Brugge IIRWDM
50%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
78%No goal before half-time41%
Club Brugge IIRWDM

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.16
Club Brugge IIRWDM
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
Club Brugge IIRWDM
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)1.03
Club Brugge IIRWDM
1.81Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Club Brugge IIRWDM
34%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Club Brugge IIRWDM
41%No goal after half-time44%
Club Brugge IIRWDM

Club Brugge II - second-half results

19% W47% R34% P
26
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 16%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RWDM - second-half results

28% W31% R41% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Club Brugge II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Club Brugge II
ScoredConceded
1
9
0-15
5
3
16-30
2
10
31-45
6
8
46-60
10
16
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
9
7
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Club Brugge II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Club Brugge IILigaRWDM
Average goals in match 2.752.84 3.25
Both teams scored 56%55% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%54% 59%
Clean sheets 16%26% 22%
Goal before half-time 63%71% 72%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Club Brugge II 0 - 0 - 1 RWDM. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47
3 : 1
Club Brugge KV II

FAQ

What was the result of Club Brugge II vs RWDM?

The First Division B match finished Club Brugge II 0:1 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Club Brugge II vs RWDM?

Club Brugge II score 1.03 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.56. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Club Brugge II's matches and 63% of RWDM's.

What form are Club Brugge II and RWDM in?

Over the last 5 games Club Brugge II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and RWDM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Brugge II vs RWDM?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.