Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Club Brugge played against Royal Antwerp FC in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Club Brugge has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Royal Antwerp FC has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Club Brugge scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 0.87. Royal Antwerp FC scores 0.93 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of Club Brugge's games and 60% of Royal Antwerp FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Club Brugge has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.30 per game. Club Brugge takes 15.7 shots per game, while Royal Antwerp FC takes 11.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Club Brugge leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.07 goals per game after halftime. Royal Antwerp FC leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.47 after halftime.

When the teams score

Club Brugge's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Royal Antwerp FC, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Pro League games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

76Possession (%)24
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
27Shots12
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
6Shots on target5
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
2.79xG1.25
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
9Corners4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
93Dangerous attacks20
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
11Fouls15
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0Cards3
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.47Goals scored / game0.93
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.87Goals allowed / game1.2
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
62%Average possession50%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
4.87Shots on target / game4.13
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.67Shots per game11.4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
4.87Shots on target4.13
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
9.4%Shot conversion8.2%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
62%Possession50%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.77xG for1.3
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.35xG against1.52
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Shooting quality

Club Brugge: DominantRoyal Antwerp FC: Balanced
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
Accuracy (shots on target)31%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Club Brugge is 300% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Club Brugge · 0.6 pts / game - Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge
WWWLW
Season result split
67% W13% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-3
2.13 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Royal Antwerp FC
LLLWL
Season result split
20% W33% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-7
0.93 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Club Brugge is 58% better for: goals scored per game.

1.47 goals / game - Club Brugge · 0.93 goals / game - Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.87 goals / game - Club Brugge · 1.2 goals / game - Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge scoring profile: very strong

Club Brugge scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while Royal Antwerp FC keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 meczów).

Royal Antwerp FC scoring profile: mixed

Royal Antwerp FC scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Club Brugge keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 meczów).

22Goals scored (season)14
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
13Goals conceded (season)18
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
2.33Average goals per game2.13
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
5Goals scored (last 5)4
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
2Goals conceded (last 5)6
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal60%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
40%2 goals20%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
7%3 goals13%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
7%4 goals0%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal93%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
13%2 goals27%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
7%3 goals0%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
7%4 goals0%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time33%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
20%Scored in both halves13%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
20%BTTS - last 540%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time53%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Club Brugge is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / game - Club Brugge · 1 pts / game - Royal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
Royal Antwerp FC - half-time state
13% leading60% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per game (1st half)1
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.47
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.87Average goals (1st half)1.07
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
60%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
67%No goal before half-time53%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

After half-time (2nd half)

2.13Points per game (2nd half)1.07
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.07Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.07
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
73%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC
27%No goal after half-time73%
Club BruggeRoyal Antwerp FC

Club Brugge - second-half results

60% W33% D7% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding335%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Royal Antwerp FC - second-half results

20% W47% D33% L
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Club Brugge - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.80.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Royal Antwerp FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.20
Goals scored / game0.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.61.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Club Brugge
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
6
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Royal Antwerp FC
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.23
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Club Brugge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Royal Antwerp FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).

Teams vs league

Club BruggeLigaRoyal Antwerp FC
Average goals per game 2.332.46 2.13
Both teams scored 40%52% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%42% 33%
Clean sheets 47%28% 7%
Goal before half-time 60%67% 73%
Goal after half-time 80%73% 53%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.06
Away goals / game
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Club BruggeSubstitutionOn: Dani van den HeuvelOff: Simon Mignolet
  2. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Gerard VandeplasOff: Gyrano Kerk
  3. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardMauricio Benítez
  4. Royal Antwerp FCSubstitutionOn: Youssef HamdaouiOff: Farouck Adekami
  5. Royal Antwerp FCGoalMauricio BenítezAssist: Youssef Hamdaoui
  6. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardBoubakar Kouyaté
  7. Royal Antwerp FCYellow cardTaishi Brandon Nozawa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Lothar D'hondtMatches officiated: 23
4.35Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 243%Home wins22%Draws35%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Club Brugge's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Royal Antwerp FC. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Royal Antwerp FC
0 : 1
Club Brugge KV

FAQ

What was the result of Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC?

The Pro League match finished Club Brugge 0:1 Royal Antwerp FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC?

Club Brugge score 1.47 goals per game on average and Royal Antwerp FC 0.93. The Pro League average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Club Brugge's matches and 60% of Royal Antwerp FC's.

What form are Club Brugge and Royal Antwerp FC in?

Over the last 5 games Club Brugge have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Royal Antwerp FC 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Club Brugge vs Royal Antwerp FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.