Trinidad & Tobago - TT Pro LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Club Sando vs Defence Force: match statistics

Club Sando crest
Club Sando
2 : 1half-time 0:0
Defence Force crest
Defence Force
130%(2.92)
X20%(3.50)
250%(2.08)

Defence Force, as the league leaders, display impressive away form with an 80% win rate and an average of 3.2 goals per away game. Their away goal difference of +22 significantly exceeds Club Sando's home record (+11). Defence Force dominate in possession (58% vs 49%) and have better shot accuracy (35% vs 24%). Although Club Sando has a decent home record (56% wins), the recent form of both teams (1.8 vs 1.4 PPG) and Defence Force's significant advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics point to an away win. Additionally, Defence Force less frequently fail to score away (10% FTS) compared to Club Sando at home (22% FTS), confirming their greater consistency in attack.

Club Sando vs Defence Force: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Club Sando play Defence Force in TT Pro League (Trinidad & Tobago). The match date is 19 March 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Club Sando: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Defence Force: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Club Sando scores 2.36 and concedes 0.59 goals per match. Defence Force scores 2.59 and concedes 0.91. League average: 3.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Club Sando 27%, Defence Force 59%. Over 2.5: Club Sando 59%, Defence Force 73%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Defence Force has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.32. Club Sando: 5.7 shots per match, Defence Force: 7.2.

Match halves

Club Sando: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.55. Defence Force: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Club Sando: 0-15 (30 goals). Defence Force: 0-15 (23 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

TT Pro League: 3.40 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Defence Force, as the league leaders, display impressive away form with an 80% win rate and an average of 3.2 goals per away game. Their away goal difference of +22 significantly exceeds Club Sando's home record (+11). Defence Force dominate in possession (58% vs 49%) and have better shot accuracy (35% vs 24%). Although Club Sando has a decent home record (56% wins), the recent form of both teams (1.8 vs 1.4 PPG) and Defence Force's significant advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics point to an away win. Additionally, Defence Force less frequently fail to score away (10% FTS) compared to Club Sando at home (22% FTS), confirming their greater consistency in attack.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Club SandoDefence Force
7Shots8
Club SandoDefence Force
3Shots on target4
Club SandoDefence Force
0.9xG1.07
Club SandoDefence Force
2Corners15
Club SandoDefence Force
34Dangerous attacks39
Club SandoDefence Force
-1Fouls-1
Club SandoDefence Force
-1Cards-1
Club SandoDefence Force

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Club SandoDefence Force
2.36Goals scored / match2.59
Club SandoDefence Force
0.59Goals conceded / match0.91
Club SandoDefence Force
33%Average possession46%
Club SandoDefence Force
2.91Shots on target / match4.32
Club SandoDefence Force

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.73Shots per match7.23
Club SandoDefence Force
2.91Shots on target4.32
Club SandoDefence Force
41.3%Shot conversion35.8%
Club SandoDefence Force
33%Possession46%
Club SandoDefence Force
1.32xG for1.34
Club SandoDefence Force
1.01xG against0.81
Club SandoDefence Force

Shooting quality

Club Sando: Counter-attackingDefence Force: Counter-attacking
Club SandoDefence Force
Accuracy (shots on target)51%60%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.230.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.810.60

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Club Sando is 71% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Club Sando · 1.4 pts / match - Defence Force

Club Sando
WLWWW
Season result split
77% W0% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
17-0-5
2.32 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-0-4
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Defence Force
DLLWW
Season result split
68% W18% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-4-3
2.23 pts / match · goal difference +37
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-0-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 0.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Defence Force is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

2.36 goals / match - Club Sando · 2.59 goals / match - Defence Force

Club Sando is 54% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.59 goals / match - Club Sando · 0.91 goals / match - Defence Force

Club Sando scoring profile: very strong

Club Sando scores in 91% of matches (20 of 22 matches), while Defence Force keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

Defence Force scoring profile: strong

Defence Force scores in 91% of matches (20 of 22 matches), while Club Sando keeps a clean sheet in 64% (14 of 22 matches).

52Goals scored (season)57
Club SandoDefence Force
13Goals conceded (season)20
Club SandoDefence Force
2.95Average goals in match3.5
Club SandoDefence Force
11Goals scored (last 5)11
Club SandoDefence Force
2Goals conceded (last 5)5
Club SandoDefence Force

How often they score at least...

91%1 goal91%
Club SandoDefence Force
55%2 goals73%
Club SandoDefence Force
41%3 goals41%
Club SandoDefence Force
18%4 goals18%
Club SandoDefence Force

How often they concede at least...

36%1 goal64%
Club SandoDefence Force
18%2 goals27%
Club SandoDefence Force
5%3 goals0%
Club SandoDefence Force
0%4 goals0%
Club SandoDefence Force

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time32%
Club SandoDefence Force
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Club SandoDefence Force
18%Scored in both halves45%
Club SandoDefence Force

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS59%
Club SandoDefence Force
32%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Club SandoDefence Force
20%BTTS - last 540%
Club SandoDefence Force

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Club SandoDefence Force
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Club SandoDefence Force
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Club SandoDefence Force

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Club SandoDefence Force
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Club SandoDefence Force
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Club SandoDefence Force

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Defence Force is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Club Sando · 1.64 pts / match - Defence Force

Club Sando - half-time state
27% leading59% draw14% trailing
Defence Force - half-time state
36% leading55% draw9% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.64
Club SandoDefence Force
0.59Goals scored (1st half)1
Club SandoDefence Force
0.23Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Club SandoDefence Force
0.82Average goals (1st half)1.41
Club SandoDefence Force
82%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Club SandoDefence Force
68%No goal before half-time45%
Club SandoDefence Force

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.68
Club SandoDefence Force
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
Club SandoDefence Force
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
Club SandoDefence Force
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.09
Club SandoDefence Force
77%Clean sheet after half-time68%
Club SandoDefence Force
64%No goal after half-time45%
Club SandoDefence Force

Club Sando - second-half results

27% W59% R14% P
31
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding285%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Defence Force - second-half results

41% W45% R14% P
36
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding189%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Club Sando - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Defence Force - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Club Sando
ScoredConceded
30
1
0-15
7
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (30 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Defence Force
ScoredConceded
23
6
0-15
9
2
16-30
8
5
31-45
3
2
46-60
6
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (23 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Club Sando

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
33%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 58% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Defence Force

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.83
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (TT Pro League).

Teams vs league

Club SandoLigaDefence Force
Average goals in match 2.953.40 3.50
Both teams scored 27%55% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%71% 73%
Clean sheets 64%23% 36%
Goal before half-time 41%44% 64%
Goal after half-time 50%50% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.40
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.79
Away goals / match
+-10%
Home attack advantage
+-11%
Home defence advantage
+-5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
44%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Club Sando 0 - 0 - 1 Defence Force. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Club Sando vs Defence Force?

The TT Pro League match finished Club Sando 2:1 Defence Force. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Club Sando vs Defence Force?

Club Sando score 2.36 goals per game on average and Defence Force 2.59. The TT Pro League average is 3.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Club Sando's matches and 59% of Defence Force's.

What form are Club Sando and Defence Force in?

Over the last 5 games Club Sando have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Defence Force 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Club Sando vs Defence Force?

The statistical background for Club Sando vs Defence Force — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.