Coastal Union vs Azam: match statistics
Coastal Union vs Azam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Coastal Union play Azam in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Mkwakwani Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Coastal Union: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Azam: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Coastal Union scores 1.03 and concedes 1.23 goals per match. Azam scores 1.52 and concedes 0.41. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Coastal Union 50%, Azam 17%. Over 2.5: Coastal Union 37%, Azam 34%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Azam has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.19. Coastal Union: 5.8 shots per match, Azam: 10.2.
Match halves
Coastal Union: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.37. Azam: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Coastal Union: 0-15 (8 goals). Azam: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I predict an away win. Azam holds a clear seasonal advantage: 15 wins versus Coastal Union’s 8, only 2 losses compared to the home side’s 11, and 40 goals scored with 12 conceded versus Coastal’s 29 scored and 34 conceded. Form supports this gap — in the last 5 matches Azam has 4 wins and 9 goals (averaging 2.4 points in that run), while Coastal has 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss, 7 goals and 1.6 points. Defensively Azam performs better: average xG against on the road is 1.18 versus 1.50 for Coastal, and 54% clean sheets away compared to 23% for the hosts, indicating greater ability to neutralize opponents’ chances. Both teams generate similar attacking xG at 1.33, with Azam attempting slightly more shots per game (9.08 vs 8.63) and higher conversion (14% vs 13%), but also 31% of away matches without a goal versus Coastal’s 8% at home. I therefore assess probabilities as 20% home win, 28% draw and 52% away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Coastal Union | Azam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.21 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.52 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Azam is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Coastal Union · 2.4 pts / match - Azam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Azam is 48% better for: goals scored per match.
1.03 goals / match - Coastal Union · 1.52 goals / match - Azam
Azam is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.23 goals / match - Coastal Union · 0.41 goals / match - Azam
Coastal Union scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 79% (23 of 29 matches).
Azam scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Coastal Union keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Coastal Union
Over / Under — Azam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.37 pts / match - Coastal Union · 1.86 pts / match - Azam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Coastal Union - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Azam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Coastal Union
Azam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Coastal Union | Liga | Azam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.27 | 2.17 | ▼ 1.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 35% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 39% | ▼ 34% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 39% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 60% | • 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 63% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Coastal Union 0 - 0 - 1 Azam. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Coastal Union vs Azam?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Coastal Union 0:2 Azam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Coastal Union vs Azam?
Coastal Union score 1.03 goals per game on average and Azam 1.52. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Coastal Union's matches and 17% of Azam's.
What form are Coastal Union and Azam in?
Over the last 5 games Coastal Union have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Azam 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coastal Union vs Azam?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.