Coastal Union vs Kitayosce: match statistics
Coastal Union displays solid form at their home ground with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses in home matches. The hosts maintain an average of 53% possession at home and boast a positive goal difference of +1 in home matches, which represents a significant advantage over the visitors. Kitayosce performs poorly in away matches, winning only 20% of games while suffering 60% losses and a negative goal difference of -2. The visitors have very low attacking efficiency away from home (FTS% 60%, averaging 0.8 goals per match) as well as poor xG statistics (0.65), indicating issues with creating goal-scoring opportunities. Despite the recent poor form of both teams, the home advantage and better organizational play of Coastal Union point towards a home win, although a draw also remains a realistic scenario due to the generally low efficiency of both sides.
Coastal Union vs Kitayosce: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Coastal Union played against Kitayosce in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on February 1, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Coastal Union has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Kitayosce has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Coastal Union scores 0.55 goals per game and allows 1.00. Kitayosce scores 1.11 and allows 0.89. Games in this league average 1.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 27% of Coastal Union's games and 33% of Kitayosce's. The Over 2.5 rates are 18% and 44%, compared with league averages of 26% for BTTS and 24% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Coastal Union has the higher season xG average, 1.14 to 0.97 per game. Coastal Union takes 5.0 shots per game, while Kitayosce takes 5.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Coastal Union leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.09 goals per game after halftime. Kitayosce leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Coastal Union's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Kitayosce, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.73 goals. Both teams score in 26% of games, and 24% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Coastal Union displays solid form at their home ground with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses in home matches. The hosts maintain an average of 53% possession at home and boast a positive goal difference of +1 in home matches, which represents a significant advantage over the visitors. Kitayosce performs poorly in away matches, winning only 20% of games while suffering 60% losses and a negative goal difference of -2. The visitors have very low attacking efficiency away from home (FTS% 60%, averaging 0.8 goals per match) as well as poor xG statistics (0.65), indicating issues with creating goal-scoring opportunities. Despite the recent poor form of both teams, the home advantage and better organizational play of Coastal Union point towards a home win, although a draw also remains a realistic scenario due to the generally low efficiency of both sides.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Coastal Union | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.23 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.71 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kitayosce is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Coastal Union · 1.2 pts / game - Kitayosce
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitayosce is 102% better for: goals scored per game.
0.55 goals / game - Coastal Union · 1.11 goals / game - Kitayosce
Kitayosce is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Coastal Union · 0.89 goals / game - Kitayosce
Coastal Union scores in 45% of games (5 of 11 games), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 games).
Kitayosce scores in 56% of games (5 of 9 games), while Coastal Union keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Coastal Union
Over / Under - Kitayosce
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Coastal Union - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Coastal Union
Kitayosce
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Coastal Union | Liga | Kitayosce | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.55 | 1.73 | ▲ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 27% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 18% | 24% | ▲ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 36% | 45% | • 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 55% | 44% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 45% | 55% | • 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KitayosceGoalDenis Nkane
FAQ
What was the result of Coastal Union vs Kitayosce?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Coastal Union 1:1 Kitayosce. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Coastal Union vs Kitayosce?
Coastal Union score 0.55 goals per game on average and Kitayosce 1.11. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Coastal Union's matches and 33% of Kitayosce's.
What form are Coastal Union and Kitayosce in?
Over the last 5 games Coastal Union have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Kitayosce 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coastal Union vs Kitayosce?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Coastal Union vs Kitayosce: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.