Coca-Cola vs ENPPI: match statistics
Coca-Cola vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Coca-Cola played against ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on October 12, 2026. Venue: Cairo International Stadium. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Coca-Cola has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. ENPPI has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Coca-Cola scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 0.80. ENPPI scores 1.20 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 2.06 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Coca-Cola's games and 80% of ENPPI's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 80%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 31% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Coca-Cola has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.17 per game. Coca-Cola takes 14.2 shots per game, while ENPPI takes 10.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Coca-Cola leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. ENPPI leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Coca-Cola's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For ENPPI, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 2.06 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 31% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Coca-Cola sit 6th and have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while 16th-placed ENPPI have managed just 1 win over the same period. The hosts have won both of their matches at home so far, scoring an average of 2 goals and conceding 0.5, while the visitors are yet to win away and concede an average of 1.5 goals. Coca-Cola’s edge in chance creation is reflected in their home xG of 1.40 compared with ENPPI’s away xG of 0.79, as well as 14.5 shots per match against their opponents’ 6. The visitors have failed to score in half of their away matches, which, combined with the hosts’ solid defense, further boosts Coca-Cola’s chances of winning. However, the small sample size of two home matches and two away matches should be taken into account, so a draw remains a realistic outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Coca-Cola average 1.33 goals at home and generate an xG of 1.43, making a goal from them fairly likely. The greater uncertainty concerns ENPPI: away from home, they generate just 0.79 xG and average 2 shots on target, compared with 4 for the hosts. The visitors have failed to score in 50% of their away matches, while Coca-Cola have conceded an average of just 0.8 goals across their last 5 matches. The main argument against BTTS - No is that both teams scored in 80% of ENPPI’s last 5 matches; however, the league rate for such outcomes is only 38%. Therefore, it is marginally more likely that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Coca-Cola average 1.33 goals and 4 shots on target per match at home, while ENPPI concede an average of 1.5 goals away. The hosts have an xG of 1.43, and the visitors allow opponents chances worth an average of 1.52 xG, supporting the case for Coca-Cola to score at least once. On the other hand, the hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals at home, although ENPPI create chances worth just 0.79 xG away, making the visitors’ contribution to the scoreline less certain. All of Coca-Cola’s home matches so far have featured at least 2 goals, but this has occurred in 50% of ENPPI’s away matches; with a predicted total of 2.70 goals, Over 1.5 goals is therefore the safest choice rather than a higher line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: both teams were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, and Coca-Cola failed to score in the first half in 4 of those 5 games. The hosts’ recent form points to a win after the break: they have averaged 1.2 goals in the second half across their last 5 matches, while ENPPI have conceded an average of 1.4 during that period. Over the same span, Coca-Cola won 3 matches and ENPPI lost 3, strengthening the hosts’ advantage in the full-time result forecast. Caution is still warranted, however, as Coca-Cola have conceded an average of 1.67 goals after the break in their matches so far this season. Despite this, their improved recent results make a draw at half-time followed by a home win the strongest HT/FT scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Coca-Cola | ENPPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Coca-Cola is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Coca-Cola · 0.8 pts / game - ENPPI
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coca-Cola is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Coca-Cola · 1.2 goals / game - ENPPI
Coca-Cola is 125% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.8 goals / game - Coca-Cola · 1.8 goals / game - ENPPI
Coca-Cola scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
ENPPI scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Coca-Cola
Over / Under - ENPPI
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ENPPI is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - Coca-Cola · 1.8 pts / game - ENPPI
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Coca-Cola - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
ENPPI - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Coca-Cola
ENPPI
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Coca-Cola | Liga | ENPPI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.20 | 2.06 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 38% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 31% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 36% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 48% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Coca-Cola's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against ENPPI. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Coca-Cola vs ENPPI?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Coca-Cola 3:2 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Coca-Cola vs ENPPI?
Coca-Cola score 1.40 goals per game on average and ENPPI 1.20. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.06 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Coca-Cola's matches and 80% of ENPPI's.
What form are Coca-Cola and ENPPI in?
Over the last 5 games Coca-Cola have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and ENPPI 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coca-Cola vs ENPPI?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Coca-Cola vs ENPPI: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.