Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Coca-Cola vs Kahraba Ismailia: match statistics

Coca-Cola crest
Coca-Cola
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Kahraba Ismailia crest
Kahraba Ismailia
150%(1.74)
X30%(3.24)
220%(4.64)

Coca-Cola holds a significantly higher position in the table (10th place) compared to Kahraba Ismailia (20th place), which indicates their class superiority. The hosts have a balanced home goal difference (0), while the visitors concede more goals on average in away matches (1.38 per game) and have a poorer away goal difference (-3). Coca-Cola boasts 50% draws at home and 38% clean sheets, pointing to defensive solidity. Kahraba Ismailia shows better form in the last 5 matches (1.6 PPG vs 1.4 PPG), however, their poor league position and higher rate of goals conceded away speak in favor of the hosts. Considering the xG advantage for the hosts (1.28 vs 1.13) and a higher possession rate (52% vs 43%), Coca-Cola has a realistic chance of winning, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the defensive stability of both teams.

Coca-Cola vs Kahraba Ismailia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Coca-Cola played against Kahraba Ismailia in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on February 16, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Coca-Cola has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Kahraba Ismailia has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Coca-Cola scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 1.07. Kahraba Ismailia scores 1.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.02 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Coca-Cola's games and 63% of Kahraba Ismailia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 63%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Coca-Cola has the higher season xG average, 1.17 to 1.16 per game. Coca-Cola takes 9.9 shots per game, while Kahraba Ismailia takes 9.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Coca-Cola leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Kahraba Ismailia leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Coca-Cola's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Kahraba Ismailia, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.02 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Coca-Cola holds a significantly higher position in the table (10th place) compared to Kahraba Ismailia (20th place), which indicates their class superiority. The hosts have a balanced home goal difference (0), while the visitors concede more goals on average in away matches (1.38 per game) and have a poorer away goal difference (-3). Coca-Cola boasts 50% draws at home and 38% clean sheets, pointing to defensive solidity. Kahraba Ismailia shows better form in the last 5 matches (1.6 PPG vs 1.4 PPG), however, their poor league position and higher rate of goals conceded away speak in favor of the hosts. Considering the xG advantage for the hosts (1.28 vs 1.13) and a higher possession rate (52% vs 43%), Coca-Cola has a realistic chance of winning, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the defensive stability of both teams.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

41Possession (%)59
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
12Shots12
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
4Shots on target3
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
1.38xG1.28
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
7Corners4
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
48Dangerous attacks42
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
12Fouls12
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
3Cards2
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
1.07Goals scored / game1
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
1.07Goals allowed / game2
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
49%Average possession43%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
2.6Shots on target / game3.5
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.93Shots per game9.19
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
2.6Shots on target3.5
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
10.7%Shot conversion10.9%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
49%Possession43%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
1.17xG for1.16
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
1.21xG against1.65
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

Shooting quality

Coca-Cola: BalancedKahraba Ismailia: Balanced
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
Accuracy (shots on target)26%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Coca-Cola is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Coca-Cola · 0.6 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Coca-Cola
LDDWD
Season result split
33% W40% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-4
1.40 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Kahraba Ismailia
LLLWL
Season result split
19% W13% D69% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-11
0.69 pts / game · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Coca-Cola is 7% better for: goals scored per game.

1.07 goals / game - Coca-Cola · 1 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Coca-Cola is 87% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.07 goals / game - Coca-Cola · 2 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Coca-Cola scoring profile: very strong

Coca-Cola scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 meczów).

Kahraba Ismailia scoring profile: very strong

Kahraba Ismailia scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).

16Goals scored (season)16
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
16Goals conceded (season)32
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
2.13Average goals per game3
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
3Goals scored (last 5)7
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
3Goals conceded (last 5)12
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal75%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
33%2 goals25%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0%3 goals0%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0%4 goals0%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal88%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
33%2 goals56%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0%3 goals25%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0%4 goals25%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
Kahraba Ismailia - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 16 meczów
46%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time13%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
13%Scored in both halves6%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
7%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Coca-Cola is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - Coca-Cola · 0.88 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia

Coca-Cola - half-time state
27% leading53% draw20% trailing
Kahraba Ismailia - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)0.88
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0.53Average goals (1st half)0.88
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
80%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
73%No goal before half-time81%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per game (2nd half)0.94
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)1.38
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
1.6Average goals (2nd half)2.13
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
33%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia
40%No goal after half-time38%
Coca-ColaKahraba Ismailia

Coca-Cola - second-half results

13% W67% D20% L
20
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results

19% W38% D44% L
14
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Coca-Cola - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.20
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game0.01.2
1 goal0%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Kahraba Ismailia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.60
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game1.01.4
Average goals per game1.62.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Coca-Cola
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Kahraba Ismailia
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
8
61-75
1
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.57
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
127%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Coca-Cola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Kahraba Ismailia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
194%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Coca-ColaLigaKahraba Ismailia
Average goals per game 2.132.02 3.00
Both teams scored 60%46% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%35% 63%
Clean sheets 27%35% 13%
Goal before half-time 47%58% 50%
Goal after half-time 73%68% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.03
Home goals / game
0.99
Away goals / game
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kahraba IsmailiaYellow cardIbrahim Awad
  2. Coca-ColaRed cardKhaled Reda
  3. Kahraba IsmailiaYellow cardAhmed Hamza
  4. Kahraba IsmailiaGoalBenjamin BoatengAssist: Hassan El Shazly
  5. Coca-ColaGoalGodwin Chika Okwara
  6. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Essam El FayoumiOff: Mohamed Farouk Mohamed Alii El Hallag
  7. Coca-ColaYellow cardMohamed Mossad Mohamed
  8. Kahraba IsmailiaSubstitutionOn: Omar El SaidOff: Serge Arnaud Aka
  9. Coca-ColaSubstitutionOn: Ahmed YoussefOff: Hossam Hassan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Coca-Cola vs Kahraba Ismailia?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Coca-Cola 1:1 Kahraba Ismailia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Coca-Cola vs Kahraba Ismailia?

Coca-Cola score 1.07 goals per game on average and Kahraba Ismailia 1.00. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Coca-Cola's matches and 63% of Kahraba Ismailia's.

What form are Coca-Cola and Kahraba Ismailia in?

Over the last 5 games Coca-Cola have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Kahraba Ismailia 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coca-Cola vs Kahraba Ismailia?

The statistical background for Coca-Cola vs Kahraba Ismailia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.