Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 22 July 2026

CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

CODM Meknès crest
CODM Meknès
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Ittihad Tanger crest
Ittihad Tanger
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

CODM Meknès presents impressive home form with 71% of matches won at home and as many as 71% clean sheets, evidencing solid defense at their own stadium. The hosts have a positive goal difference (+4) in home matches and concede an average of just 0.57 goals per match. Conversely, Ittihad Tanger performs very poorly away – just 17% wins, 50% losses, and not a single clean sheet in away matches. The visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals per away match, and in half of the encounters, they fail to score at all. The form of the last five matches also favors the hosts (1.6 pts/match vs 0.4 pts/match), which, combined with the home advantage of CODM Meknès, makes them the decided favorite of this meeting.

CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CODM Meknès play Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 6 March 2026 at 23:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

CODM Meknès: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CODM Meknès scores 0.80 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CODM Meknès 40%, Ittihad Tanger 53%. Over 2.5: CODM Meknès 33%, Ittihad Tanger 27%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.11. CODM Meknès: 9.1 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.4.

Match halves

CODM Meknès: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.60. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

CODM Meknès: 46-60 (9 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

CODM Meknès presents impressive home form with 71% of matches won at home and as many as 71% clean sheets, evidencing solid defense at their own stadium. The hosts have a positive goal difference (+4) in home matches and concede an average of just 0.57 goals per match. Conversely, Ittihad Tanger performs very poorly away – just 17% wins, 50% losses, and not a single clean sheet in away matches. The visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals per away match, and in half of the encounters, they fail to score at all. The form of the last five matches also favors the hosts (1.6 pts/match vs 0.4 pts/match), which, combined with the home advantage of CODM Meknès, makes them the decided favorite of this meeting.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
6Shots13
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
2Shots on target4
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0.8xG1.38
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
1Corners6
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
37Dangerous attacks38
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
16Fouls13
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
5Cards3
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0.8Goals scored / match0.9
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
1.1Goals conceded / match1.03
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
50%Average possession49%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
2.6Shots on target / match3.27
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.1Shots per match10.4
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
2.6Shots on target3.27
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
8.8%Shot conversion8.7%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
50%Possession49%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
1.11xG for1.3
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
1.36xG against1.48
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

CODM Meknès: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Balanced
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)29%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - CODM Meknès · 1.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

CODM Meknès
LDDWL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Ittihad Tanger
WLDLW
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ittihad Tanger is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - CODM Meknès · 0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Ittihad Tanger is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - CODM Meknès · 1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

CODM Meknès scoring profile: strong

CODM Meknès scores in 60% of matches (18 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

24Goals scored (season)27
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
33Goals conceded (season)31
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
1.9Average goals in match1.93
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
7Goals scored (last 5)4
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal67%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
17%2 goals23%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
3%3 goals0%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal80%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
37%2 goals20%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
10%3 goals3%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time10%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
3%BTTS in both halves0%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
3%Scored in both halves10%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
80%BTTS - last 540%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

43%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ittihad Tanger is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - CODM Meknès · 1.07 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

CODM Meknès - half-time state
10% leading60% draw30% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.07
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.33
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0.7Average goals (1st half)0.83
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
67%Clean sheet before half-time57%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
83%No goal before half-time70%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.37
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.1
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
47%Clean sheet after half-time53%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger
53%No goal after half-time53%
CODM MeknèsIttihad Tanger

CODM Meknès - second-half results

30% W43% R27% P
27
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CODM Meknès - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.20
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CODM Meknès
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
6
31-45
9
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.92
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CODM Meknès

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

CODM MeknèsLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals in match 1.902.17 1.93
Both teams scored 40%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%38% 27%
Clean sheets 37%30% 20%
Goal before half-time 43%63% 63%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CODM Meknès 0 - 0 - 1 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished CODM Meknès 1:0 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger?

CODM Meknès score 0.80 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.90. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 40% of CODM Meknès's matches and 53% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are CODM Meknès and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games CODM Meknès have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.