CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics
CODM Meknès presents impressive home form with 71% of matches won at home and as many as 71% clean sheets, evidencing solid defense at their own stadium. The hosts have a positive goal difference (+4) in home matches and concede an average of just 0.57 goals per match. Conversely, Ittihad Tanger performs very poorly away – just 17% wins, 50% losses, and not a single clean sheet in away matches. The visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals per away match, and in half of the encounters, they fail to score at all. The form of the last five matches also favors the hosts (1.6 pts/match vs 0.4 pts/match), which, combined with the home advantage of CODM Meknès, makes them the decided favorite of this meeting.
CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CODM Meknès played against Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on March 6, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
CODM Meknès has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Ittihad Tanger has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
CODM Meknès scores 0.79 goals per game and allows 0.79. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.79 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.07 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of CODM Meknès's games and 57% of Ittihad Tanger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 21% and 29%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ittihad Tanger has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.08 per game. CODM Meknès takes 9.1 shots per game, while Ittihad Tanger takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
CODM Meknès leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Ittihad Tanger leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
CODM Meknès's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Ittihad Tanger, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.07 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CODM Meknès presents impressive home form with 71% of matches won at home and as many as 71% clean sheets, evidencing solid defense at their own stadium. The hosts have a positive goal difference (+4) in home matches and concede an average of just 0.57 goals per match. Conversely, Ittihad Tanger performs very poorly away – just 17% wins, 50% losses, and not a single clean sheet in away matches. The visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals per away match, and in half of the encounters, they fail to score at all. The form of the last five matches also favors the hosts (1.6 pts/match vs 0.4 pts/match), which, combined with the home advantage of CODM Meknès, makes them the decided favorite of this meeting.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CODM Meknès | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
CODM Meknès is 300% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - CODM Meknès · 0.4 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CODM Meknès is 63% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.79 goals / game - CODM Meknès · 1.29 goals / game - Ittihad Tanger
CODM Meknès scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).
Ittihad Tanger scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 57% (8 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CODM Meknès
Over / Under - Ittihad Tanger
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CODM Meknès is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - CODM Meknès · 1.07 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CODM Meknès - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ittihad Tanger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CODM Meknès
Ittihad Tanger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| CODM Meknès | Liga | Ittihad Tanger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.57 | 2.07 | • 2.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 45% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 21% | 35% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 57% | 34% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 29% | 59% | ▲ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CODM MeknèsYellow cardSoufiane Tahar
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger?
The Botola Pro match finished CODM Meknès 1:0 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger?
CODM Meknès score 0.79 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.79. The Botola Pro average is 2.07 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 29% of CODM Meknès's matches and 57% of Ittihad Tanger's.
What form are CODM Meknès and Ittihad Tanger in?
Over the last 5 games CODM Meknès have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CODM Meknès vs Ittihad Tanger?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.