CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat: match statistics
CODM Meknès is displaying impressive home form with a 75% win rate and only one loss at their stadium this season. The hosts have won three of their last four home matches, keeping a clean sheet in 75% of home games, which demonstrates a solid defense. UTS Rabat has not won a single away match this season, drawing half and losing the other half of their away fixtures, with poor form in their last five matches (0.4 points per game). The visitors have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away game, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per match, while CODM Meknès scores an average of 1.25 goals in home games. The disparity in quality, particularly in the context of the hosts' home advantage and the visitors' complete lack of away wins, clearly points to a CODM Meknès victory. xG statistics also favor the hosts, who create more goal-scoring opportunities than UTS Rabat does in away matches.
CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CODM Meknès played against UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on January 31, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
CODM Meknès has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. UTS Rabat has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
CODM Meknès scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 0.78. UTS Rabat scores 0.89 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 2.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of CODM Meknès's games and 78% of UTS Rabat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 22% and 33%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
UTS Rabat has the higher season xG average, 1.10 to 1.07 per game. CODM Meknès takes 8.9 shots per game, while UTS Rabat takes 7.6.
First-half and second-half trends
CODM Meknès leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.44 after halftime.
When the teams score
CODM Meknès's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For UTS Rabat, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.21 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CODM Meknès is displaying impressive home form with a 75% win rate and only one loss at their stadium this season. The hosts have won three of their last four home matches, keeping a clean sheet in 75% of home games, which demonstrates a solid defense. UTS Rabat has not won a single away match this season, drawing half and losing the other half of their away fixtures, with poor form in their last five matches (0.4 points per game). The visitors have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away game, conceding an average of 1.5 goals per match, while CODM Meknès scores an average of 1.25 goals in home games. The disparity in quality, particularly in the context of the hosts' home advantage and the visitors' complete lack of away wins, clearly points to a CODM Meknès victory. xG statistics also favor the hosts, who create more goal-scoring opportunities than UTS Rabat does in away matches.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CODM Meknès | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
CODM Meknès is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - CODM Meknès · 0.4 pts / game - UTS Rabat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CODM Meknès is 85% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.78 goals / game - CODM Meknès · 1.44 goals / game - UTS Rabat
CODM Meknès scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 meczów), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 9 meczów).
UTS Rabat scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while CODM Meknès keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CODM Meknès
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CODM Meknès is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - CODM Meknès · 0.78 pts / game - UTS Rabat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CODM Meknès - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CODM Meknès
UTS Rabat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| CODM Meknès | Liga | UTS Rabat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.67 | 2.21 | ▲ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 46% | ▲ 78% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 22% | 38% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 32% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 66% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat?
The Botola Pro match finished CODM Meknès 1:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat?
CODM Meknès score 0.89 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 0.89. The Botola Pro average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 33% of CODM Meknès's matches and 78% of UTS Rabat's.
What form are CODM Meknès and UTS Rabat in?
Over the last 5 games CODM Meknès have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and UTS Rabat 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat?
The statistical background for CODM Meknès vs UTS Rabat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.