Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas: match statistics
Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Colorado Rapids played against FC Dallas in MLS (United States). The game was played on May 24, 2026. Venue: Dick's Sporting Goods Park. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Colorado Rapids has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. FC Dallas has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Colorado Rapids scores 1.71 goals per game and allows 1.57. FC Dallas scores 2.00 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 3.28 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Colorado Rapids's games and 64% of FC Dallas's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 64%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FC Dallas has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.26 per game. Colorado Rapids takes 10.6 shots per game, while FC Dallas takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Colorado Rapids leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. FC Dallas leads at halftime in 21% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Colorado Rapids's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For FC Dallas, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.28 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Dallas holds a slight edge going into this fixture, primarily due to form: the visitors have scored 11 goals and won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Colorado have scored 4 and won 2 of their last 5. In terms of chance quality the teams are nearly level: home xG averages 1.67 for Colorado and away xG 1.66 for FC Dallas, indicating a similar number of high-value opportunities. Colorado at home averages 2.8 goals per game, 55% possession and 19% shot accuracy, but concedes 1.4 goals per game and keeps a clean sheet in only 20% of matches. FC Dallas on the road registers more shots on target (6.8 vs 5.8), concedes 1.0 goal on average and records clean sheets in 40% of away matches, which combined with 11 goals in their last five gives them an advantage in attacking efficiency and defense. Given the comparable xG but clearly superior form of the visitors, I expect a narrow FC Dallas win; I estimate 45% probability for an away win, 35% for the home side and 20% for a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast BTTS - Yes (65%) vs No (35%) because Colorado’s seasonal profile shows BTTS in 78% of matches and only 11% clean sheets at home, meaning opponents score against them in about 89% of games. FC Dallas has a seasonal BTTS of 40% and 40% clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches the visitors have 80% BTTS and average 2.2 goals per game (11 goals in 5 matches), with recent xG of 1.42, which significantly increases their likelihood of scoring. The counterargument is Colorado’s poor form: only 0.8 goals scored in the last 5 matches, a drop in xG to 0.94 and 20% BTTS in the same period, which limits confidence in the pick. Additionally, seasonal averages show Colorado concedes 1.78 goals per match and FC Dallas concedes 1.0, so it is easier for the visitors to find the net. Considering the home team’s high seasonal BTTS (78%), Dallas’s strong recent form (80% BTTS, 2.2 goals) and the overall league tendency of 61% BTTS, the Yes scenario is more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Average xG indicates 1.36 expected goals for Colorado (attacking xG 1.34 vs xG conceded to FC Dallas 1.37) and 1.41 for FC Dallas (attacking xG 1.66 vs xG conceded to Colorado 1.16), totaling 2.77 goals. This season Colorado has 67% of matches with Over 2.5 goals, FC Dallas 60%, and the league averages 3.26 goals per game, which supports the Over 2.5 side. Both teams average 2.0 goals per game this season (Colorado 2.0, Dallas 2.0) and generate 12.1 and 14.0 shots per game with conversion rates of 17% and 14%, increasing the likelihood of goals. At the same time, in the last 5 matches Colorado scored only 4 goals (0.8/game) while Dallas scored 11 (2.2/game), so Over 3.5 is assessed as less certain (approx. 48%). Therefore the best signal from the data is Over 2.5 (est. 68%), with a very high probability for Over 1.5 (approx. 92%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I select the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario draw at the break and away win (X/2) because FC Dallas has a 60% win rate this season compared to Colorado Rapids’ 33%, with average xG of 1.66 versus 1.34 and average shots on target 6.8 versus 4.0, indicating an away advantage. Additionally, the visitors have been level at the break in 60% of their matches, while the hosts have been trailing at the break in 44% of their games, which increases the probability of a draw at half-time. After the break FC Dallas scores on average 1.2 goals and wins second halves in about 60% of cases, whereas the Rapids score 0.89 goals after the break on average, so the visitors more often complete a turnaround after the interval. The hosts have higher shot conversion (17% versus 14%), and the Rapids record BTTS in 78% of matches, giving them chances to score in the first half, but FC Dallas’s superior quality and stronger second halves make X/2 the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Colorado Rapids | FC Dallas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
FC Dallas is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Colorado Rapids · 1.8 pts / game - FC Dallas
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Dallas is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.71 goals / game - Colorado Rapids · 2 goals / game - FC Dallas
FC Dallas is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.57 goals / game - Colorado Rapids · 1.5 goals / game - FC Dallas
Colorado Rapids scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while FC Dallas keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 meczów).
FC Dallas scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 meczów), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Colorado Rapids
Over / Under - FC Dallas
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Colorado Rapids is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / game - Colorado Rapids · 1.07 pts / game - FC Dallas
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Colorado Rapids - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
FC Dallas - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Colorado Rapids
FC Dallas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Colorado Rapids | Liga | FC Dallas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.29 | 3.28 | ▲ 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 61% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 63% | • 64% |
| Clean sheets | • 21% | 22% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 77% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 81% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas?
The MLS match finished Colorado Rapids 1:2 FC Dallas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas?
Colorado Rapids score 1.71 goals per game on average and FC Dallas 2.00. The MLS average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Colorado Rapids's matches and 64% of FC Dallas's.
What form are Colorado Rapids and FC Dallas in?
Over the last 5 games Colorado Rapids have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and FC Dallas 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Rapids vs FC Dallas?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


