Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact: match statistics
Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Colorado Rapids played against Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Dick's Sporting Goods Park. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Colorado Rapids has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Montreal Impact has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Colorado Rapids scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.33. Montreal Impact scores 1.29 and allows 2.08. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Colorado Rapids's games and 54% of Montreal Impact's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 67%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Montreal Impact has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.33 per game. Colorado Rapids takes 11.8 shots per game, while Montreal Impact takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Colorado Rapids leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Montreal Impact leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.58 after halftime.
When the teams score
Colorado Rapids's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Montreal Impact, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Colorado Rapids are clearly stronger at home, where they win 73% of their matches, score an average of 1.91 goals, and concede just 0.82 goals per game. Montreal have lost 75% of their away matches, while their defense concedes an average of as many as 2.92 goals, with clean sheets in just 8% of games. The hosts also create better chances: their average xG stands at 1.76 compared with Montreal’s 1.34, and they additionally register 16.27 shots per match versus 11.92 for their opponents. Recent form also favors Colorado, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Montreal have recorded just 1 victory and conceded 13 goals during that period. Home advantage, greater possession at 59%, and the visitors’ very poor away defensive record all point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Colorado has a seasonal BTTS rate of 55%, while Montreal stands at 50%; however, the hosts’ current form clearly reduces the likelihood of a goal from both sides. In their last 5 matches, Colorado scored just 4 goals—an average of 0.8 per game—and did not record a BTTS scenario even once. Montreal have been conceding heavily, averaging 2.92 goals per game over the season and 2.6 across their last five matches, with just 8% clean sheets, making a Colorado goal highly likely. The visitors have recently averaged 1.2 goals scored, but Colorado allowed opponents just 0.93 xG over their last five matches, increasing the risk that Montreal will fail to respond with a goal. The most likely outcome is therefore BTTS - No, primarily due to the visitors’ weaker attacking potential against Colorado’s currently more solid defense.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as at least two goals were scored in 73% of Colorado’s matches and in as many as 92% of Montreal’s games. Montreal concede an average of 2.92 goals per match, rising to 2.60 across their last five appearances, which significantly increases the hosts’ attacking potential, with an average xG of 1.66. Colorado have generated 1.48 xG in their last five matches, while the opposition defense allowed 1.76 xG during that period. The visitors still contribute attacking potential of 1.25 goals and 1.34 xG per match, but the Rapids’ more solid defense, conceding an average of 1.18 goals, limits the projection for higher goal lines. The combined projection of 2.85 goals also supports Over 2.5, but the 1.5 line has by far the highest probability of success.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario points to Colorado Rapids leading at the break and maintaining their advantage through to the end of the match. The hosts were ahead at half-time in 36% of their matches, while Montreal were trailing at that stage in as many as 58% of their outings and conceded an average of 1.17 goals before the break. The key factor behind the expected full-time result is the visitors’ extremely weak defensive record, allowing opponents an average of 2.92 goals per match, including 1.75 after half-time. Colorado create more chances, averaging 14.55 shots and 5.45 on target compared with Montreal’s 11.92 and 4.50, while their xG stands at 1.66 versus 1.34 for the visitors. The risk of a draw remains significant, as the Rapids have drawn 45% of their matches this season, but the hosts’ advantage increases after the interval, when Montreal concede particularly frequently.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Colorado Rapids | Montreal Impact | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Colorado Rapids is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Colorado Rapids · 0.8 pts / game - Montreal Impact
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Rapids is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Colorado Rapids · 2.08 goals / game - Montreal Impact
Colorado Rapids scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 games), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 games).
Montreal Impact scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 games), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Colorado Rapids
Over / Under - Montreal Impact
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Colorado Rapids is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Colorado Rapids · 1.13 pts / game - Montreal Impact
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Colorado Rapids - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Montreal Impact - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Colorado Rapids
Montreal Impact
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Colorado Rapids | Liga | Montreal Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.67 | 3.21 | ▲ 3.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 64% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 21% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 77% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 82% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact?
The MLS match finished Colorado Rapids 1:0 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact?
Colorado Rapids score 1.33 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.29. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Colorado Rapids's matches and 54% of Montreal Impact's.
What form are Colorado Rapids and Montreal Impact in?
Over the last 5 games Colorado Rapids have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Montreal Impact 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


