United States - MLSDick's Sporting Goods ParkData current as of September 18, 2026

Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact: match statistics

Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Colorado Rapids played against Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Dick's Sporting Goods Park. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Colorado Rapids has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Montreal Impact has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Colorado Rapids scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.33. Montreal Impact scores 1.29 and allows 2.08. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 42% of Colorado Rapids's games and 54% of Montreal Impact's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 67%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Montreal Impact has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.33 per game. Colorado Rapids takes 11.8 shots per game, while Montreal Impact takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Colorado Rapids leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Montreal Impact leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.58 after halftime.

When the teams score

Colorado Rapids's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Montreal Impact, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Colorado Rapids are clearly stronger at home, where they win 73% of their matches, score an average of 1.91 goals, and concede just 0.82 goals per game. Montreal have lost 75% of their away matches, while their defense concedes an average of as many as 2.92 goals, with clean sheets in just 8% of games. The hosts also create better chances: their average xG stands at 1.76 compared with Montreal’s 1.34, and they additionally register 16.27 shots per match versus 11.92 for their opponents. Recent form also favors Colorado, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while Montreal have recorded just 1 victory and conceded 13 goals during that period. Home advantage, greater possession at 59%, and the visitors’ very poor away defensive record all point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Colorado has a seasonal BTTS rate of 55%, while Montreal stands at 50%; however, the hosts’ current form clearly reduces the likelihood of a goal from both sides. In their last 5 matches, Colorado scored just 4 goals—an average of 0.8 per game—and did not record a BTTS scenario even once. Montreal have been conceding heavily, averaging 2.92 goals per game over the season and 2.6 across their last five matches, with just 8% clean sheets, making a Colorado goal highly likely. The visitors have recently averaged 1.2 goals scored, but Colorado allowed opponents just 0.93 xG over their last five matches, increasing the risk that Montreal will fail to respond with a goal. The most likely outcome is therefore BTTS - No, primarily due to the visitors’ weaker attacking potential against Colorado’s currently more solid defense.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as at least two goals were scored in 73% of Colorado’s matches and in as many as 92% of Montreal’s games. Montreal concede an average of 2.92 goals per match, rising to 2.60 across their last five appearances, which significantly increases the hosts’ attacking potential, with an average xG of 1.66. Colorado have generated 1.48 xG in their last five matches, while the opposition defense allowed 1.76 xG during that period. The visitors still contribute attacking potential of 1.25 goals and 1.34 xG per match, but the Rapids’ more solid defense, conceding an average of 1.18 goals, limits the projection for higher goal lines. The combined projection of 2.85 goals also supports Over 2.5, but the 1.5 line has by far the highest probability of success.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario points to Colorado Rapids leading at the break and maintaining their advantage through to the end of the match. The hosts were ahead at half-time in 36% of their matches, while Montreal were trailing at that stage in as many as 58% of their outings and conceded an average of 1.17 goals before the break. The key factor behind the expected full-time result is the visitors’ extremely weak defensive record, allowing opponents an average of 2.92 goals per match, including 1.75 after half-time. Colorado create more chances, averaging 14.55 shots and 5.45 on target compared with Montreal’s 11.92 and 4.50, while their xG stands at 1.66 versus 1.34 for the visitors. The risk of a draw remains significant, as the Rapids have drawn 45% of their matches this season, but the hosts’ advantage increases after the interval, when Montreal concede particularly frequently.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
18Shots11
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
7Shots on target5
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
1.94xG1.24
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
5Corners1
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
44Dangerous attacks28
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
13Fouls11
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
2Cards1
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
1.33Goals scored / game1.29
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
1.33Goals allowed / game2.08
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
55%Average possession49%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
3.96Shots on target / game4.96
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.83Shots per game13.33
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
3.96Shots on target4.96
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
11.3%Shot conversion9.7%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
55%Possession49%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
1.33xG for1.52
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
1.25xG against1.45
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

Shooting quality

Colorado Rapids: BalancedMontreal Impact: Balanced
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Colorado Rapids is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Colorado Rapids · 0.8 pts / game - Montreal Impact

Colorado Rapids
WLWLD
Season result split
42% W8% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-12
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-0-3
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Montreal Impact
WDLLL
Season result split
21% W25% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-13
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Rapids is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.33 goals / game - Colorado Rapids · 2.08 goals / game - Montreal Impact

Colorado Rapids scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Rapids scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 games), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 games).

Montreal Impact scoring profile: strong

Montreal Impact scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 games), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 games).

32Goals scored (season)31
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
32Goals conceded (season)50
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
2.67Average goals per game3.38
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
7Goals conceded (last 5)14
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal67%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
29%2 goals38%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
13%3 goals17%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
13%4 goals8%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal83%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
42%2 goals63%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
25%3 goals29%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
0%4 goals17%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time38%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
0%BTTS in both halves13%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
17%Scored in both halves25%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
20%BTTS - last 580%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Colorado Rapids is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / game - Colorado Rapids · 1.13 pts / game - Montreal Impact

Colorado Rapids - half-time state
29% leading38% draw33% trailing
Montreal Impact - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per game (1st half)1.13
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
1.17Average goals (1st half)1.54
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
58%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
54%No goal before half-time46%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)0.96
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
46%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact
58%No goal after half-time63%
Colorado RapidsMontreal Impact

Colorado Rapids - second-half results

38% W21% D42% L
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding145%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Montreal Impact - second-half results

25% W21% D54% L
27
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Colorado Rapids - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Montreal Impact - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game1.01.8
Average goals per game1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Colorado Rapids
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
5
6
16-30
3
6
31-45
6
1
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Montreal Impact
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
8
16-30
7
8
31-45
4
10
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Colorado Rapids

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Montreal Impact

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Colorado RapidsLigaMontreal Impact
Average goals per game 2.673.21 3.38
Both teams scored 42%64% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%62% 67%
Clean sheets 33%21% 17%
Goal before half-time 67%77% 75%
Goal after half-time 79%82% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.85
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Colorado RapidsGoalPaxten Aaronson
  2. Colorado RapidsSubstitutionOn: Wayne Alix Frederick IIOff: Joshua Atencio
  3. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Fabian HerbersOff: Samuel Piette
  4. Montreal ImpactYellow cardDante Sealy
  5. Montreal ImpactSubstitutionOn: Olger EscobarOff: Noah Streit
  6. Colorado RapidsYellow cardKosi Thompson
  7. Colorado RapidsYellow cardWayne Alix Frederick II

FAQ

What was the result of Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact?

The MLS match finished Colorado Rapids 1:0 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact?

Colorado Rapids score 1.33 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.29. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Colorado Rapids's matches and 54% of Montreal Impact's.

What form are Colorado Rapids and Montreal Impact in?

Over the last 5 games Colorado Rapids have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Montreal Impact 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Colorado Rapids vs Montreal Impact: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.