Columbus Crew vs Montreal Impact: match statistics
Columbus Crew vs Montreal Impact: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Columbus Crew played against Montreal Impact in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 19, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Columbus Crew has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Montreal Impact has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Columbus Crew scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 1.63. Montreal Impact scores 1.32 and allows 1.89. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 74% of Columbus Crew's games and 47% of Montreal Impact's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 63%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Montreal Impact has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.50 per game. Columbus Crew takes 12.4 shots per game, while Montreal Impact takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Columbus Crew leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Montreal Impact leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Columbus Crew's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Montreal Impact, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Columbus Crew are unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws while scoring 10 goals during that period, whereas Montreal have won just 1 of their last 5 games and scored only 4 goals. The home advantage is reinforced by their home record: they win 44% of matches, concede an average of just 1.00 goal, and keep a clean sheet in 33% of games. Montreal lose as many as 78% of their away matches, concede an average of 2.78 goals per game, and have a negative goal difference of -13. Crew should also control the game more often, as they average 58% possession at home compared with Montreal’s 49% away from home, while their average xG stands at 1.51 versus 1.39 for the visitors. The away side fail to score in 44% of away matches, which, combined with Columbus’ more consistent defensive record, strongly points towards a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Columbus have recorded BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals and conceding 1.2, which clearly supports a Goal/Goal scenario. Montreal have scored only 0.8 goals per match over this period, but their average xG stands at 1.47, while Columbus have allowed opponents an xG of 1.50. The hosts should score against a Montreal defense that concedes an average of 2.78 goals away from home this season and keeps a clean sheet in just 11% of matches. The season-long BTTS rate for both teams is only 44%; however, Columbus’ attacking form and the visitors’ defensive weakness increase the chances that Montreal will also convert one of their opportunities. The BTTS - Yes pick is therefore moderately stronger, although the visitors’ limited recent scoring output leaves a significant risk of a BTTS - No scenario, meaning that at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Columbus should be able to exploit Montreal’s very weak defense, which concedes an average of 2.78 goals per match, while the hosts’ xG stands at 1.56. In their last five matches, Columbus have scored 10 goals, or 2.0 per game, while the two teams average 5.11 and 4.44 shots on target per match, respectively. The 1.5-goal line has been exceeded in 67% of Columbus matches and in as many as 89% of Montreal games, providing a clearly stronger signal than higher goal thresholds. Montreal average 1.33 goals scored, but only 0.8 over their last five matches, which is why the larger share of the projected 2.80 goals is expected to come from the hosts. Over 1.5 goals has an edge thanks to the combination of Columbus’ attacking form and the high number of goals conceded by the visitors.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Columbus have a clear advantage in terms of form: they have averaged 2.0 goals over their last five matches and remain unbeaten, while Montreal have won only 20% of their games in the same sample. The hosts were leading at the break in 60% of their last five appearances and averaged 1.6 goals before half-time, whereas Montreal failed to score in this phase and were level at half-time in as many as 80% of their matches. Season data shows that Montreal concede an average of 2.78 goals per away match and allow opponents to score 1.56 goals after the break, which favors Columbus maintaining or extending their lead. In addition, the hosts have the better average xG, 1.56 compared with 1.39, as well as a significantly higher season-long rate of leading at half-time, 44% versus 22%. Therefore, the most likely scenario is Columbus leading at half-time and securing victory at full-time, corresponding to the HT/FT outcome 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Columbus Crew | Montreal Impact | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Columbus Crew is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Columbus Crew · 0.6 pts / game - Montreal Impact
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Columbus Crew is 8% better for: goals scored per game.
1.42 goals / game - Columbus Crew · 1.32 goals / game - Montreal Impact
Columbus Crew is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.63 goals / game - Columbus Crew · 1.89 goals / game - Montreal Impact
Columbus Crew scores in 84% of games (16 of 19 meczów), while Montreal Impact keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
Montreal Impact scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while Columbus Crew keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Columbus Crew
Over / Under - Montreal Impact
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Columbus Crew is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / game - Columbus Crew · 1.21 pts / game - Montreal Impact
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Columbus Crew - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 26%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Montreal Impact - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 21%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Columbus Crew
Montreal Impact
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Columbus Crew | Liga | Montreal Impact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.05 | 3.20 | • 3.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 62% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 61% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 21% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 76% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 81% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Columbus CrewGoalThomas Clemente Philippe Gillier Correa
FAQ
What was the result of Columbus Crew vs Montreal Impact?
The MLS match finished Columbus Crew 1:2 Montreal Impact. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Columbus Crew vs Montreal Impact?
Columbus Crew score 1.42 goals per game on average and Montreal Impact 1.32. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Columbus Crew's matches and 47% of Montreal Impact's.
What form are Columbus Crew and Montreal Impact in?
Over the last 5 games Columbus Crew have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Montreal Impact 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Columbus Crew vs Montreal Impact?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Columbus Crew vs Montreal Impact: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


