Italy - Serie AStadio Giuseppe SinigagliaData current as of October 16, 2026

Como vs Roma: match statistics

Como crest
Como
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Roma crest
Roma

Como vs Roma: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Como played against Roma in Serie A (Italy). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Como has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Roma has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Como scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.20. Roma scores 2.80 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 2.91 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 80% of Como's games and 40% of Roma's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Como has the higher season xG average, 2.44 to 2.31 per game. Como takes 23.4 shots per game, while Roma takes 20.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Como leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Roma leads at halftime in 80% and scores 1.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

Como's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Roma, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie A games average 2.91 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Roma sit 1st in the table and remain unbeaten after five matches, while eighth-placed Como have won four of their last five games but have also suffered one defeat. The visitors have scored 14 goals and conceded 3 this season, compared with the hosts’ record of 9 scored and 6 conceded, pointing to Roma’s clear edge in both finishing and defense. Roma average 3 goals away from home and have yet to concede, although Como are also impressive going forward on their own turf: they average 2 goals, with an xG of 2.99 compared with Roma’s 1.86 away from home. The hosts average 29 shots at home but convert only 7% of them into goals; the visitors register 14.5 shots per away game and have a 21% conversion rate. Como’s ability to create chances suggests a closely contested match, but the more clinical and defensively solid Roma hold a slight edge to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Como score an average of 2.67 goals at home and generate an xG of 2.62, giving them a realistic chance of breaking through Roma’s defense. The visitors have yet to concede away from home, but they allow opponents chances worth an average xG of 0.91, so their run of clean sheets does not rule out a goal for the hosts. Roma score an average of 3.0 goals away from home, while Como concede 1.0 at home, which points to a goal for the visitors. In their last 5 matches, both teams scored in 80% and 60% of games respectively, so despite Roma’s strong defense, BTTS - Yes is marginally the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Como scored an average of 2.4 goals and Roma 2.2; matches involving the two teams went Over 2.5 goals in 80% and 60% of cases, respectively. Their attacking potential is backed up by their xG over this period: 2.35 for Como and 2.16 for Roma, although the visitors conceded an average of just 0.8 goals per match. Roma kept a clean sheet in 100% of the matches included in the away statistics, so I take a more cautious view of the chances of three or four goals. The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals: both teams reached this line in 100% of their matches so far at home and away, respectively, and the projected total is 3.2 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Roma won both away matches included in the sample, led at the break in each and kept a clean sheet, scoring an average of 2.0 goals before half-time. Como led at the break in 2 of its 3 home matches and has generated a higher xG than Roma away from home (2.62 versus 1.86), so an away advantage is not a foregone conclusion. Roma’s ability to maintain a potential lead is supported by the fact that it also won the second half in both away matches, scoring an average of 1.0 goal after the break without conceding, while Como conceded an average of 1.0 goal in that period at home. The most likely HT/FT outcome is therefore 2/2, although confidence is limited by Roma’s sample of just 2 away matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
ComoRoma
19Shots9
ComoRoma
4Shots on target2
ComoRoma
2.01xG0.93
ComoRoma
6Corners2
ComoRoma
73Dangerous attacks29
ComoRoma
9Fouls9
ComoRoma
2Cards5
ComoRoma

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.8Goals scored / game2.8
ComoRoma
1.2Goals allowed / game0.6
ComoRoma
62%Average possession58%
ComoRoma
7.2Shots on target / game7
ComoRoma

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

23.4Shots per game20.6
ComoRoma
7.2Shots on target7
ComoRoma
7.7%Shot conversion13.6%
ComoRoma
62%Possession58%
ComoRoma
2.44xG for2.31
ComoRoma
1.47xG against1.07
ComoRoma

Shooting quality

Como: DominantRoma: Dominant
ComoRoma
Accuracy (shots on target)31%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Roma is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Como · 2.6 pts / game - Roma

Como
DWWWL
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.44Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Roma
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
80% W20% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.31Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Roma is 56% better for: goals scored per game.

1.8 goals / game - Como · 2.8 goals / game - Roma

Roma is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.2 goals / game - Como · 0.6 goals / game - Roma

Como scoring profile: mixed

Como scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 games), while Roma keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 games).

Roma scoring profile: very strong

Roma scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 games), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 games).

9Goals scored (season)14
ComoRoma
6Goals conceded (season)3
ComoRoma
3Average goals per game3.4
ComoRoma
9Goals scored (last 5)14
ComoRoma
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
ComoRoma

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
ComoRoma
60%2 goals100%
ComoRoma
20%3 goals40%
ComoRoma
20%4 goals40%
ComoRoma

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal40%
ComoRoma
20%2 goals20%
ComoRoma
0%3 goals0%
ComoRoma
0%4 goals0%
ComoRoma

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time0%
ComoRoma
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ComoRoma
40%Scored in both halves60%
ComoRoma

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
ComoRoma
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS40%
ComoRoma
80%BTTS - last 540%
ComoRoma

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
ComoRoma
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
ComoRoma
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
ComoRoma

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
ComoRoma
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
ComoRoma
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
ComoRoma

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Roma is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.8 pts / game - Como · 2.6 pts / game - Roma

Como - half-time state
60% leading0% draw40% trailing
Roma - half-time state
80% leading20% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.8Points per game (1st half)2.6
ComoRoma
1.2Goals scored (1st half)1.4
ComoRoma
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
ComoRoma
2.2Average goals (1st half)1.4
ComoRoma
20%Clean sheet before half-time100%
ComoRoma
40%No goal before half-time20%
ComoRoma

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per game (2nd half)2.4
ComoRoma
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
ComoRoma
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
ComoRoma
0.8Average goals (2nd half)2
ComoRoma
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
ComoRoma
40%No goal after half-time20%
ComoRoma

Como - second-half results

40% W60% D0% L
9
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.8

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Roma - second-half results

80% W0% D20% L
13
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 80% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Como - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.80
Goals scored / game1.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.2
Average goals per game2.20.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Roma - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.602.40
Goals scored / game1.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.00.6
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+7+4
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Como
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Roma
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Como

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.97
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Roma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.96
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
206%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

ComoLigaRoma
Average goals per game• 3.002.91▲ 3.40
Both teams scored▲ 80%57%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 60%57%▲ 80%
Clean sheets▼ 0%22%▲ 60%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%66%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%87%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ComoYellow cardAssane Diao Diaoune
  2. RomaYellow cardMarten de Roon
  3. RomaRed cardDonyell Malen
  4. RomaYellow cardKouadio Kone
  5. RomaYellow cardMatìas Soulè Malvano
  6. ComoSubstitutionOn: Martin BaturinaOff: Lucas Da Cunha
  7. RomaSubstitutionOn: Devyne RenschOff: Nahuel Molina Lucero
  8. ComoYellow cardMartin Baturina

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Como's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Roma. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Como vs Roma?

The Serie A match finished Como 0:0 Roma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Como and Roma?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Como won 1, Roma won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Como vs Roma?

Como score 1.80 goals per game on average and Roma 2.80. The Serie A average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Como's matches and 40% of Roma's.

What form are Como and Roma in?

Over the last 5 games Como have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Roma 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Como vs Roma?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.