Concepción vs Universidad Católica: match statistics
Concepción vs Universidad Católica: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Concepción played Universidad Católica in Primera División (Chile). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Estadio Municipal Alcaldesa Ester Roa Rebolledo. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Concepción: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Universidad Católica: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Concepción scores 1.00 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Universidad Católica scores 2.38 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Concepción 38%, Universidad Católica 69%. Over 2.5: Concepción 38%, Universidad Católica 75%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Universidad Católica has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.36. Concepción: 13.6 shots per match, Universidad Católica: 13.6.
Match halves
Concepción: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.56. Universidad Católica: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.25.
Goals by minute
Concepción: 76-90+ (4 goals). Universidad Católica: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Universidad Católica are the favorites based on season-long metrics: 38 goals scored versus Concepción’s 16, and 2nd place in the table compared to the hosts’ 14th. The visitors average 1.88 goals per away match, have average possession of 57% and shot conversion around 14%, while Concepción at home record 1.38 goals, 49% possession and only about 9% conversion. Still, the hosts are in good form — 4 wins in the last 5 matches and an average of 2.4 points over that span — and post a higher home xG of 1.62 versus the visitors’ 1.40, suggesting they create higher-quality chances. Both teams concede on average 1.38 goals per game, but Católica are less likely to finish without scoring (FTS 25% vs 38%), highlighting an edge in chance finishing. Consequently I expect an away win, although I anticipate an open game with several goals.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Strongest signal supports BTTS - Yes: Concepción has a seasonal BTTS rate of 88% and only 13% of matches with a clean sheet expected, while Universidad Católica recorded BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and conceded on average 2.2 goals per game. Seasonal goals averages are 2.88 for Concepción and 1.88 for Universidad Católica, with corresponding xG of 1.47 and 1.40, indicating both teams create scoring opportunities (total xG ~2.87) and can convert them (shot conversion 20% vs 14%). Counterargument is the hosts' short-form run: in the last 5 matches Concepción had only 20% BTTS and conceded on average 0.6 goals, suggesting defensive improvement in recent outings. However, the high percentage of over 2.5 goals for the hosts (88%) and the visitors (63%), together with seasonal goal rates and low clean sheet percentages (13% and 25%), increase the likelihood of goals from both sides. Therefore I assess BTTS probability at 72% for 'yes' and 28% for 'no', and the best tip to play is 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Concepción score an average of 2.88 goals at home and have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, while Universidad Católica score 1.88 goals away with 75% of matches over 1.5, which gives a strong signal for Over 1.5. Based on xG, expected goals are around 1.34 for the hosts (attacking xG 1.47 and opponent defensive xG 1.21) and 1.28 for the visitors (attacking xG 1.40 and hosts' defensive xG 1.15), totaling 2.62. Concepción convert shots very efficiently (20% conversion from 14.13 shots per game), which explains the gap between xG 1.47 and the 2.88 home average; however, in the last 5 matches the hosts had only 20% of games over 2.5, which limits overall confidence. Universidad Católica have had 100% of their last 5 matches over 2.5 and 80% BTTS in the last 5, and a season rate of 63% away games over 2.5, boosting the likelihood of more goals. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I rate 88%), Over 2.5 is also likely (76%) while Over 3.5 is closer to even (51%) and I treat it as a more risky selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1: Concepción leads at the break and wins the match, because the home side led at the break in 4 home matches (50%), while Universidad Católica led at the break in only 2 away matches (25%). The hosts have a slight edge in xG (1.47 vs 1.40) and better shot efficiency (conversion 20% vs 14%), and Concepción’s seasonal goals average is 2.88 with a high average goals-per-game at their ground of 4.38, which favors maintaining a lead. Additionally, Concepción scores on average 1.63 goals after the break and has 2.0 points on average in second halves versus the visitors’ 1.75, increasing the chance that a first-half lead will be turned into a win. It is worth noting, however, that Universidad Católica scored 9 first-half goals in the last 5 games (vs the home side’s 3 first-half goals) and have 6 goals in the 76–90 minute window, so the risk of a turnaround exists; nevertheless, the hosts’ characteristics (50% HT leads, higher xG and efficiency, and BTTS 88%) provide the strongest signal for 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Concepción | Universidad Católica | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.49 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Universidad Católica is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Concepción · 2 pts / match - Universidad Católica
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Universidad Católica is 138% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Concepción · 2.38 goals / match - Universidad Católica
Concepción scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Universidad Católica keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
Universidad Católica scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Concepción keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Concepción
Over / Under — Universidad Católica
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Concepción - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Universidad Católica - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Concepción
Universidad Católica
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Concepción | Liga | Universidad Católica | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.44 | 2.85 | ▲ 3.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 50% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 54% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 28% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 73% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 76% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Concepción 0 - 0 - 1 Universidad Católica. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Concepción vs Universidad Católica?
The Primera División match finished Concepción 3:0 Universidad Católica. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Concepción vs Universidad Católica?
Concepción score 1.00 goals per game on average and Universidad Católica 2.38. The Primera División average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Concepción's matches and 69% of Universidad Católica's.
What form are Concepción and Universidad Católica in?
Over the last 5 games Concepción have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Universidad Católica 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Concepción vs Universidad Católica?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Concepción vs Universidad Católica: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


