Concordia Chiajna vs CSM Satu Mare: match statistics
Concordia Chiajna clearly dominates in home matches with 60% win efficiency and an impressive goal difference of +11. The hosts average 1.9 goals per match at home with just 0.8 goals conceded, confirming their defensive solidity (50% clean sheets). CSM Satu Mare presents very poor away form with 70% losses and a negative balance of -12 goals, scoring an average of only 0.5 goals away. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 50% of away matches, which, given the hosts' effective offense (xG 1.81), makes them the clear favorite. Despite Concordia's recent weaker streak of five defeats, their advantage in home statistics and the dramatic weakness of CSM Satu Mare on the road unequivocally indicate a victory for the hosts.
Concordia Chiajna vs CSM Satu Mare: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Concordia Chiajna played against CSM Satu Mare in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 4:2.
Recent form
Concordia Chiajna has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. CSM Satu Mare has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Concordia Chiajna scores 1.32 goals per game and allows 1.11. CSM Satu Mare scores 0.79 and allows 2.16. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Concordia Chiajna's games and 53% of CSM Satu Mare's. The Over 2.5 rates are 37% and 53%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Concordia Chiajna has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.24 per game. Concordia Chiajna takes 12.7 shots per game, while CSM Satu Mare takes 9.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Concordia Chiajna leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.84 goals per game after halftime. CSM Satu Mare leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.58 after halftime.
When the teams score
Concordia Chiajna's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). For CSM Satu Mare, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Concordia Chiajna clearly dominates in home matches with 60% win efficiency and an impressive goal difference of +11. The hosts average 1.9 goals per match at home with just 0.8 goals conceded, confirming their defensive solidity (50% clean sheets). CSM Satu Mare presents very poor away form with 70% losses and a negative balance of -12 goals, scoring an average of only 0.5 goals away. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 50% of away matches, which, given the hosts' effective offense (xG 1.81), makes them the clear favorite. Despite Concordia's recent weaker streak of five defeats, their advantage in home statistics and the dramatic weakness of CSM Satu Mare on the road unequivocally indicate a victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Concordia Chiajna | CSM Satu Mare | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
CSM Satu Mare is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna · 0.8 pts / game - CSM Satu Mare
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Concordia Chiajna is 67% better for: goals scored per game.
1.32 goals / game - Concordia Chiajna · 0.79 goals / game - CSM Satu Mare
Concordia Chiajna is 95% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.11 goals / game - Concordia Chiajna · 2.16 goals / game - CSM Satu Mare
Concordia Chiajna scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 meczów), while CSM Satu Mare keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 meczów).
CSM Satu Mare scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while Concordia Chiajna keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Concordia Chiajna
Over / Under - CSM Satu Mare
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Concordia Chiajna is 89% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Concordia Chiajna · 0.53 pts / game - CSM Satu Mare
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Concordia Chiajna - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
CSM Satu Mare - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Concordia Chiajna
CSM Satu Mare
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Concordia Chiajna | Liga | CSM Satu Mare | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.42 | 2.65 | ▲ 2.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 48% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 49% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 30% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 81% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Concordia ChiajnaYellow cardAbdel Billel Omrani
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Concordia Chiajna vs CSM Satu Mare?
The Liga II match finished Concordia Chiajna 4:2 CSM Satu Mare. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Concordia Chiajna vs CSM Satu Mare?
Concordia Chiajna score 1.32 goals per game on average and CSM Satu Mare 0.79. The Liga II average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Concordia Chiajna's matches and 53% of CSM Satu Mare's.
What form are Concordia Chiajna and CSM Satu Mare in?
Over the last 5 games Concordia Chiajna have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and CSM Satu Mare 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Concordia Chiajna vs CSM Satu Mare?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.