United States - MLS Next ProData current as of September 06, 2026

Connecticut United vs Carolina Core: match statistics

Connecticut United vs Carolina Core: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Connecticut United played against Carolina Core in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on July 5, 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Connecticut United has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Carolina Core has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Connecticut United scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.87. Carolina Core scores 1.18 and allows 1.65. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 73% of Connecticut United's games and 65% of Carolina Core's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 59%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Connecticut United has the higher season xG average, 1.76 to 1.42 per game. Connecticut United takes 14.1 shots per game, while Carolina Core takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Connecticut United leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Carolina Core leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.76 after halftime.

When the teams score

Connecticut United's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Carolina Core, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Connecticut United creates more chances: on average 13.5 shots and 5.83 on target per home match versus Carolina Core's 10.11 shots and 3.44 on target away, and their average xG is 1.68 vs. the visitors' 1.24, indicating higher-quality opportunities. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 12 goals while the guests scored only 7, with both teams averaging 1.4 points per game in that period; Carolina also has not won any away match this season (0% wins). Defensively Connecticut fares better in expected threat — average xG against 1.21 at home versus 1.78 for the away side, and actual goals conceded are 1.83 vs. 2.00 per match. The visitors fail to score in 44% of away games compared to 33% of matches without a goal for the hosts, and Carolina's away goal difference is -10 versus the hosts' -4, so the hosts' main advantages are volume of chances, higher xG and a more resilient defense. Despite a high loss rate for both sides (67%), creation metrics and xG favor a Connecticut United win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is favored by the data: Connecticut United posts BTTS at 75% for the season and 80% in the last 5 matches, vs. a league average BTTS of 62%. Carolina Core has a season BTTS of 56% (last 5 matches 40%), but concedes an average of 2.0 goals per game this season compared to Connecticut’s 1.25, which raises the likelihood of both teams scoring. xG and shooting metrics support goal probability: Connecticut generates xG 1.63 and averages 14.13 shots with 4.75 on target; Carolina records xG 1.24 and 10.11 shots with 3.44 on target, while Carolina concedes xG against of 1.78. Additionally, only 25% of Connecticut’s matches and 22% of Carolina’s matches end in a clean sheet, and matches over 2.5 goals occur in 50% (home) and 67% (away) respectively, with the combined Over2.5 + BTTS occurring at 50% and 56%. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at roughly 70% vs 30% and recommend "BTTS - Yes" as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects approximately 1.70 expected goals for Connecticut United (xG_for 1.63 vs. xG_against opponents 1.78 → average ≈1.70) and 1.44 for Carolina Core (xG_for 1.24 vs. xG_against hosts 1.63 → ≈1.44), yielding a combined ~3.14 goals. With that total xG, a Poisson model estimates ~82% probability of Over 1.5 goals, ~61% for Over 2.5 goals and ~38% for Over 3.5 goals, strongly favoring the over market. Match data confirm this direction: the home side averages 1.5 goals this season and have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches (2.4 per game) with 100% of those five games exceeding 2.5 goals, while the visitors concede 2.0 goals on average and have 67% of their season matches finishing Over 2.5. The home attack is more active (14.13 shots per match, 11% conversion vs. 10.11 and 9% for the away team) and home matches have seen Both Teams To Score in 75% of cases (away side in 56%), increasing the likelihood of additional goals. Based on the combined xG of 3.14, shot-volume advantage and recent form, I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (selection: Over, line 1.5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A typical scenario is 1/1 (home team leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time), because the home side led at the break in 3 of 8 matches (38%) and have a 38% home win rate, while the away team has no wins (0%). The home team scores an average of 1.5 goals per match versus 0.89 for the visitors, and the home xG is 1.63 versus 1.24 for the away side, confirming offensive superiority and more chances (14.13 shots vs 10.11, 4.75 shots on target vs 3.44). In the first half the home team averages 0.63 goals while the away team only 0.22; additionally, 100% of home matches had at least one goal before the break, which increases the likelihood of a lead at the break. In the second half the home side also dominates—averaging 0.88 goals and registering 50% wins in second halves versus 11% for the away team—so maintaining or extending the lead after Half-Time is very likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

40Possession (%)60
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
15Shots17
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
7Shots on target7
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1.57xG1.69
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1Corners4
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
20Dangerous attacks19
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
22Fouls14
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
3Cards1
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1.67Goals scored / game1.18
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1.87Goals allowed / game1.65
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
46%Average possession45%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
6.27Shots on target / game4.06
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.13Shots per game12
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
6.27Shots on target4.06
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
11.8%Shot conversion9.8%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
46%Possession45%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1.76xG for1.42
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1.27xG against1.71
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

Shooting quality

Connecticut United: AttackingCarolina Core: Balanced
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
Accuracy (shots on target)44%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Connecticut United
DLWWL
Season result split
33% W13% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-8
1.13 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.80Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Carolina Core
LWLDW
Season result split
18% W35% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-8
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Connecticut United is 42% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Connecticut United · 1.18 goals / game - Carolina Core

Carolina Core is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.87 goals / game - Connecticut United · 1.65 goals / game - Carolina Core

Connecticut United scoring profile: very strong

Connecticut United scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while Carolina Core keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 meczów).

Carolina Core scoring profile: very strong

Carolina Core scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 meczów), while Connecticut United keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)20
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
28Goals conceded (season)28
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
3.53Average goals per game2.82
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
12Goals scored (last 5)7
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal76%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
47%2 goals41%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
27%3 goals0%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
13%4 goals0%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal76%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
67%2 goals53%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
20%3 goals29%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
13%4 goals6%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

73%
Connecticut United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 15 meczów
61%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time18%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
20%BTTS in both halves6%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
40%Scored in both halves18%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

BTTS and goal count

73%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
80%BTTS - last 540%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Connecticut United is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / game - Connecticut United · 1 pts / game - Carolina Core

Connecticut United - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Carolina Core - half-time state
24% leading29% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per game (1st half)1
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
0.93Goals scored (1st half)0.41
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1.73Average goals (1st half)1.29
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
47%Clean sheet before half-time35%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
33%No goal before half-time65%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per game (2nd half)1.35
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.53
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
20%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core
47%No goal after half-time41%
Connecticut UnitedCarolina Core

Connecticut United - second-half results

27% W27% R47% P
20
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Carolina Core - second-half results

29% W47% R24% P
17
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 18%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Connecticut United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.40
Goals scored / game1.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game2.22.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Carolina Core - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.20
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Connecticut United
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
5
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
1
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Carolina Core
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
5
6
31-45
7
2
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.18
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Connecticut United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Carolina Core

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Connecticut UnitedLigaCarolina Core
Average goals per game 3.533.24 2.82
Both teams scored 73%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%65% 59%
Clean sheets 13%22% 24%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 82%
Goal after half-time 93%84% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.81
Home goals / game
1.43
Away goals / game
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Connecticut UnitedGoalMiklos Barnabas Tanyi
  2. Carolina CoreYellow cardRyan Baer
  3. Connecticut UnitedYellow cardSean Petrie
  4. Carolina CoreGoalArnaud TattevinAssist: Ricardo Montenegro
  5. Connecticut UnitedYellow cardGunther Rankenburg
  6. Connecticut UnitedAssistMiklos Barnabas Tanyi
  7. Connecticut UnitedAssistAlen Colnarič
  8. Connecticut UnitedYellow cardAndreas Applewhaite

FAQ

What was the result of Connecticut United vs Carolina Core?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Connecticut United 3:1 Carolina Core. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Connecticut United vs Carolina Core?

Connecticut United score 1.67 goals per game on average and Carolina Core 1.18. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Connecticut United's matches and 65% of Carolina Core's.

What form are Connecticut United and Carolina Core in?

Over the last 5 games Connecticut United have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Carolina Core 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Connecticut United vs Carolina Core?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Connecticut United vs Carolina Core: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.