United States - MLS Next ProData current as of September 08, 2026

Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II: match statistics

Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Connecticut United played against FC Cincinnati II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on June 18, 2026. Final score: 4:0.

Recent form

Connecticut United has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. FC Cincinnati II has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Connecticut United scores 1.54 goals per game and allows 1.85. FC Cincinnati II scores 0.92 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 3.25 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 77% of Connecticut United's games and 38% of FC Cincinnati II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 77% and 54%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Connecticut United has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.24 per game. Connecticut United takes 13.9 shots per game, while FC Cincinnati II takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Connecticut United leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. FC Cincinnati II leads at halftime in 8% and scores 0.69 after halftime.

When the teams score

Connecticut United's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For FC Cincinnati II, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.25 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Connecticut United has the edge in chance creation and better recent form: in the last five matches they scored 10 goals (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses) and have home xG of 1.56, while FC Cincinnati II scored only 1 goal in their last five matches and have away xG of 1.21. The hosts average 12.5 shots and 5 on-target per home match versus the visitors’ 9.17 shots and 3.5 on-target away, translating into higher-quality chances for Connecticut despite both teams having an equally low conversion rate (4%). Defensively the visitors look weaker — FC Cincinnati II concedes 2.33 goals per away match and have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 games, whereas the hosts concede 1.75 goals in home matches. The risk for the hosts stems from having not yet won at home (0% wins) and failing to score in 50% of home appearances, but they have recently averaged 1.4 points per match in their last five games compared to 0 points for the visitors. Considering the hosts’ superior xG (1.56 vs 1.21), higher shot volume and the visitors’ dire run (0 points in the last 5 matches and 100% away defeats), I predict a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend no BTTS: I assign 70% probability to 'No' and 30% to 'Yes', because FC Cincinnati II have very low scoring efficiency – averaging 0.33 goals per game for the season and only 0.2 in the last 5 matches (1 goal in 5), while Connecticut United record 1.43 goals for the season and 2.0 in the last 5 (10 goals). Despite similar xG (home xG 1.27 vs away 1.21), the conversion gap of 14% vs 4% clearly shows the visitors fail to convert created chances. Additionally, FC Cincinnati II concede on average 2.33 goals for the season and 2.2 in the last 5, which means the hosts are likely to score, but the hosts' own goals conceded (1.29 seasonally, 1.8 in the last 5) do not translate into the visitors' ability to respond. Season BTTS rates are 43% for Connecticut and 33% for Cincinnati, and the last 5 form balance (80% BTTS for the hosts vs 20% for the visitors) ultimately gives a stronger signal against Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 1.27 (Connecticut United) + 1.21 (FC Cincinnati II) = 2.48, and in the last 5 matches Connecticut scores an average of 2.0 goals (10 goals) versus 0.2 goals (1 goal) for visitors, therefore I project 1.70 for the home side and 0.70 for the away side, total 2.40. Season Over 1.5 rates are 57% for Connecticut and 83% for Cincinnati II (average 70%), and the fact both teams have 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals and the league average is 3.23 goals/match reinforces a minimum-2-goal scenario. Connecticut has better shot conversion (14% on 10.14 shots) than the visitors (4% on 9.17), and FC Cincinnati II concedes an average of 2.33 goals per game, which supports the home advantage in creating and converting chances. The signal for Over 2.5 is weaker: season Over 2.5 is 57%/50% (average 53%) and the combined xG = 2.48 is very close to the 2.5 threshold, so I adopt a moderate probability for Over 2.5 (52%). As a result the strongest and best-justified selection is Over 1.5 (over) due to the combination of xG, home form and the difference in shooting efficiency.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I project a Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of draw at the break and Connecticut United winning (X/1) as the most probable. In the last five matches the home side were level at half-time in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and averaged 1.0 goals by the break, whereas FC Cincinnati II did not lead at half-time in any of those five games (0%) and averaged 0.0 first-half goals. In the second half the home team is markedly more dangerous — they score an average of 1.14 goals after the break versus 0.17 for the visitors, and the visitors concede an average of 1.33 second-half goals, which favors a turnaround from a half-time draw. Additionally, FC Cincinnati II have lost 100% of matches this season (losePercentage_away 100.0), the season average goals for the home side is 1.43 compared to 0.33 for the visitors, and the home team shows higher conversion (14% vs 4%) and more shots on target (4.0 vs 3.5). For these reasons the X/1 variant carries the highest weight in the forecast.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
19Shots11
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
11Shots on target3
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
2.39xG1.3
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
2Corners6
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
59Dangerous attacks55
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
10Fouls15
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
2Cards0
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.54Goals scored / game0.92
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.85Goals allowed / game1.77
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%Average possession43%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
6.08Shots on target / game3.77
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.92Shots per game9.69
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
6.08Shots on target3.77
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
11%Shot conversion9.5%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%Possession43%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.74xG for1.24
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.23xG against1.82
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Shooting quality

Connecticut United: BalancedFC Cincinnati II: Balanced
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Connecticut United
LWDLW
Season result split
31% W15% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-7
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 at home
0-1-3
LLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
FC Cincinnati II
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
23% W0% R77% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-10
0.69 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-6
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Connecticut United is 67% better for: goals scored per game.

1.54 goals / game - Connecticut United · 0.92 goals / game - FC Cincinnati II

FC Cincinnati II is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.85 goals / game - Connecticut United · 1.77 goals / game - FC Cincinnati II

Connecticut United scoring profile: very strong

Connecticut United scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while FC Cincinnati II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 meczów).

FC Cincinnati II scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati II scores in 54% of games (7 of 13 meczów), while Connecticut United keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).

20Goals scored (season)12
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
24Goals conceded (season)23
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
3.38Average goals per game2.69
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
10Goals scored (last 5)1
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
9Goals conceded (last 5)11
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal54%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%2 goals15%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
23%3 goals8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
8%4 goals8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal85%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
69%2 goals54%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
15%3 goals31%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
8%4 goals8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

77%
Connecticut United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 13 meczów
63%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time15%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
23%BTTS in both halves0%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
38%Scored in both halves8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

BTTS and goal count

77%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
80%BTTS - last 520%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Connecticut United is 111% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / game - Connecticut United · 0.62 pts / game - FC Cincinnati II

Connecticut United - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing
FC Cincinnati II - half-time state
8% leading38% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per game (1st half)0.62
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
0.77Goals scored (1st half)0.23
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.54Average goals (1st half)1.08
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
38%No goal before half-time77%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)0.92
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.08Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
1.85Average goals (2nd half)1.62
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
15%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II
46%No goal after half-time62%
Connecticut UnitedFC Cincinnati II

Connecticut United - second-half results

23% W31% R46% P
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FC Cincinnati II - second-half results

23% W23% R54% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding288%

Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Connecticut United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.00
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game1.42.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
FC Cincinnati II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.60
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game1.01.2
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Connecticut United
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
1
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

FC Cincinnati II
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
0
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.04
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Connecticut United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

FC Cincinnati II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Connecticut UnitedLigaFC Cincinnati II
Average goals per game 3.383.25 2.69
Both teams scored 77%63% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%65% 54%
Clean sheets 8%21% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%75% 77%
Goal after half-time 92%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / game
1.45
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Connecticut UnitedGoalMiklos Barnabas TanyiAssist: Alex Monis
  2. Connecticut UnitedGoalAndreas Applewhaite
  3. Connecticut UnitedGoalDylan Lacy
  4. Connecticut UnitedYellow cardSteven Sserwadda
  5. Connecticut UnitedYellow cardErnesto Gómez
  6. Connecticut UnitedGoalMiklos Barnabas Tanyi

Head-to-head

Record from Connecticut United's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against FC Cincinnati II. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FC Cincinnati II
1 : 3
Connecticut United

FAQ

What was the result of Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Connecticut United 4:0 FC Cincinnati II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II?

Connecticut United score 1.54 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati II 0.92. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Connecticut United's matches and 38% of FC Cincinnati II's.

What form are Connecticut United and FC Cincinnati II in?

Over the last 5 games Connecticut United have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and FC Cincinnati II 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Connecticut United vs FC Cincinnati II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.