Coritiba vs Remo: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates even chances for both teams, which speaks in favor of a draw. Coritiba presents very poor home form with a 0% win rate and a 100% loss rate in home matches, however, their recent overall form (1 win and 3 draws in their last 5 matches) is more stable. Remo has not won any away match this season (0% wins, 50% draws), but shows better offensive statistics with an average of 1.5 goals per away match compared to 0 goals for Coritiba at home. Both teams have an identical goal difference (-2) in their respective categories, as well as high xG Against values, suggesting defensive vulnerability on both sides. Considering the hosts' weak home form, the visitors' lack of away wins, and their tendency to draw, a sharing of points is the most likely outcome.
Coritiba vs Remo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Coritiba played against Remo in Serie A (Brazil). The game was played on March 15, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Coritiba has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Remo has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Coritiba scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 1.20. Remo scores 1.20 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Coritiba's games and 60% of Remo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 40%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Remo has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.03 per game. Coritiba takes 10.6 shots per game, while Remo takes 14.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Coritiba leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Remo leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Coritiba's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Remo, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie A games average 2.78 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates even chances for both teams, which speaks in favor of a draw. Coritiba presents very poor home form with a 0% win rate and a 100% loss rate in home matches, however, their recent overall form (1 win and 3 draws in their last 5 matches) is more stable. Remo has not won any away match this season (0% wins, 50% draws), but shows better offensive statistics with an average of 1.5 goals per away match compared to 0 goals for Coritiba at home. Both teams have an identical goal difference (-2) in their respective categories, as well as high xG Against values, suggesting defensive vulnerability on both sides. Considering the hosts' weak home form, the visitors' lack of away wins, and their tendency to draw, a sharing of points is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Coritiba | Remo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.54 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Coritiba is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Coritiba · 0.6 pts / game - Remo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coritiba is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Coritiba · 1.2 goals / game - Remo
Coritiba is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - Coritiba · 2 goals / game - Remo
Coritiba scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 meczów).
Remo scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while Coritiba keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Coritiba
Over / Under - Remo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coritiba is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - Coritiba · 1.2 pts / game - Remo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Coritiba - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Remo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Coritiba
Remo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Coritiba | Liga | Remo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.60 | 2.78 | ▲ 3.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 63% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 47% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | • 20% | 19% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 78% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Coritiba's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Remo. Games average 0.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Coritiba vs Remo?
The Serie A match finished Coritiba 1:0 Remo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Coritiba and Remo?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Coritiba won 0, Remo won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Coritiba vs Remo?
Coritiba score 1.40 goals per game on average and Remo 1.20. The Serie A average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Coritiba's matches and 60% of Remo's.
What form are Coritiba and Remo in?
Over the last 5 games Coritiba have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Remo 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coritiba vs Remo?
The statistical background for Coritiba vs Remo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.