Brazil - Serie AData current as of 19 July 2026

Coritiba vs Remo: match statistics

Coritiba crest
Coritiba
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Remo crest
Remo
135%(1.76)
X40%(3.50)
225%(4.60)

Statistical analysis indicates even chances for both teams, which speaks in favor of a draw. Coritiba presents very poor home form with a 0% win rate and a 100% loss rate in home matches, however, their recent overall form (1 win and 3 draws in their last 5 matches) is more stable. Remo has not won any away match this season (0% wins, 50% draws), but shows better offensive statistics with an average of 1.5 goals per away match compared to 0 goals for Coritiba at home. Both teams have an identical goal difference (-2) in their respective categories, as well as high xG Against values, suggesting defensive vulnerability on both sides. Considering the hosts' weak home form, the visitors' lack of away wins, and their tendency to draw, a sharing of points is the most likely outcome.

Coritiba vs Remo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Coritiba play Remo in Serie A (Brazil). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 22:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Coritiba: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Remo: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Coritiba scores 1.33 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Remo scores 1.17 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.65 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Coritiba 44%, Remo 56%. Over 2.5: Coritiba 44%, Remo 44%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Remo has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.09. Coritiba: 10.2 shots per match, Remo: 12.2.

Match halves

Coritiba: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.72. Remo: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

Coritiba: 31-45+ (6 goals). Remo: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.65 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates even chances for both teams, which speaks in favor of a draw. Coritiba presents very poor home form with a 0% win rate and a 100% loss rate in home matches, however, their recent overall form (1 win and 3 draws in their last 5 matches) is more stable. Remo has not won any away match this season (0% wins, 50% draws), but shows better offensive statistics with an average of 1.5 goals per away match compared to 0 goals for Coritiba at home. Both teams have an identical goal difference (-2) in their respective categories, as well as high xG Against values, suggesting defensive vulnerability on both sides. Considering the hosts' weak home form, the visitors' lack of away wins, and their tendency to draw, a sharing of points is the most likely outcome.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
CoritibaRemo
8Shots14
CoritibaRemo
4Shots on target1
CoritibaRemo
1.05xG1.28
CoritibaRemo
4Corners6
CoritibaRemo
37Dangerous attacks45
CoritibaRemo
13Fouls12
CoritibaRemo
2Cards3
CoritibaRemo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match1.17
CoritibaRemo
1.33Goals conceded / match1.61
CoritibaRemo
39%Average possession43%
CoritibaRemo
3.28Shots on target / match3.94
CoritibaRemo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.17Shots per match12.17
CoritibaRemo
3.28Shots on target3.94
CoritibaRemo
13.1%Shot conversion9.6%
CoritibaRemo
39%Possession43%
CoritibaRemo
1.09xG for1.3
CoritibaRemo
1.83xG against1.6
CoritibaRemo

Shooting quality

Coritiba: Counter-attackingRemo: Balanced
CoritibaRemo
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Remo is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Coritiba · 2 pts / match - Remo

Coritiba
LDWWL
Season result split
39% W28% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-6
1.44 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Remo
WDWLW
Season result split
22% W33% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Coritiba is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Coritiba · 1.17 goals / match - Remo

Coritiba is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Coritiba · 1.61 goals / match - Remo

Coritiba scoring profile: very strong

Coritiba scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

Remo scoring profile: strong

Remo scores in 61% of matches (11 of 18 matches), while Coritiba keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

24Goals scored (season)21
CoritibaRemo
24Goals conceded (season)29
CoritibaRemo
2.67Average goals in match2.78
CoritibaRemo
9Goals scored (last 5)8
CoritibaRemo
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
CoritibaRemo

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal61%
CoritibaRemo
44%2 goals33%
CoritibaRemo
17%3 goals17%
CoritibaRemo
0%4 goals6%
CoritibaRemo

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal89%
CoritibaRemo
39%2 goals50%
CoritibaRemo
17%3 goals17%
CoritibaRemo
6%4 goals6%
CoritibaRemo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time39%
CoritibaRemo
6%BTTS in both halves11%
CoritibaRemo
33%Scored in both halves17%
CoritibaRemo

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
CoritibaRemo
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
CoritibaRemo
60%BTTS - last 580%
CoritibaRemo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
CoritibaRemo
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
CoritibaRemo
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
CoritibaRemo

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
CoritibaRemo
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
CoritibaRemo
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
CoritibaRemo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Coritiba is 71% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Coritiba · 0.78 pts / match - Remo

Coritiba - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Remo - half-time state
6% leading61% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)0.78
CoritibaRemo
0.61Goals scored (1st half)0.56
CoritibaRemo
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
CoritibaRemo
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.33
CoritibaRemo
56%Clean sheet before half-time28%
CoritibaRemo
50%No goal before half-time56%
CoritibaRemo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)1.06
CoritibaRemo
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
CoritibaRemo
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
CoritibaRemo
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.44
CoritibaRemo
44%Clean sheet after half-time44%
CoritibaRemo
44%No goal after half-time67%
CoritibaRemo

Coritiba - second-half results

33% W28% R39% P
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding118%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Remo - second-half results

22% W39% R39% P
14
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding367%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Coritiba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Remo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Coritiba
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
5
16-30
6
2
31-45
6
5
46-60
4
4
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Remo
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
7
16-30
4
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
1
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-82%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Coritiba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Remo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

CoritibaLigaRemo
Average goals in match 2.672.65 2.78
Both teams scored 44%58% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%50% 44%
Clean sheets 28%23% 11%
Goal before half-time 78%77% 78%
Goal after half-time 83%78% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Coritiba 0 - 1 - 1 Remo. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Coritiba FBC
0 : 0
Clube do Remo
Clube do Remo
1 : 0
Coritiba FBC

FAQ

What was the result of Coritiba vs Remo?

The Serie A match finished Coritiba 1:0 Remo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Coritiba and Remo?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Coritiba won 0, Remo won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Coritiba vs Remo?

Coritiba score 1.33 goals per game on average and Remo 1.17. The Serie A average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Coritiba's matches and 56% of Remo's.

What form are Coritiba and Remo in?

Over the last 5 games Coritiba have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Remo 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Coritiba vs Remo?

The statistical background for Coritiba vs Remo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.