Mexico - Ascenso MXData current as of September 13, 2026

Correcaminos UAT vs CA La Paz: match statistics

Correcaminos UAT crest
Correcaminos UAT
0 : 3half-time 0:2
CA La Paz crest
CA La Paz
125%(2.82)
X30%(3.50)
245%(2.10)

CA La Paz presents a clear advantage over Correcaminos UAT in key statistics. The hosts have a disastrous home record with 71% losses and just 14% wins, conceding an average of 2.43 goals per match at home. CA La Paz possesses significantly better efficiency (15% shot conversion vs 10% for the hosts) and an advantage in possession (54% vs 44%). The visitors score an average of 1.86 goals away, which, given the hosts' poor defense (38 conceded goals this season), gives them a real chance for all three points. Form over the last five matches is comparable, yet the decidedly better seasonal record and offensive parameters favor a victory for CA La Paz, although a draw remains in play due to the visitors' tendency to share points (43% away draws).

Correcaminos UAT vs CA La Paz: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Correcaminos UAT played against CA La Paz in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The game was played on January 17, 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Recent form

Correcaminos UAT has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. CA La Paz has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Correcaminos UAT scores 1.07 goals per game and allows 2.53. CA La Paz scores 1.80 and allows 2.13. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Correcaminos UAT's games and 73% of CA La Paz's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 73%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

CA La Paz has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.16 per game. Correcaminos UAT takes 9.3 shots per game, while CA La Paz takes 14.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Correcaminos UAT leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. CA La Paz leads at halftime in 47% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Correcaminos UAT's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For CA La Paz, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ascenso MX games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

CA La Paz presents a clear advantage over Correcaminos UAT in key statistics. The hosts have a disastrous home record with 71% losses and just 14% wins, conceding an average of 2.43 goals per match at home. CA La Paz possesses significantly better efficiency (15% shot conversion vs 10% for the hosts) and an advantage in possession (54% vs 44%). The visitors score an average of 1.86 goals away, which, given the hosts' poor defense (38 conceded goals this season), gives them a real chance for all three points. Form over the last five matches is comparable, yet the decidedly better seasonal record and offensive parameters favor a victory for CA La Paz, although a draw remains in play due to the visitors' tendency to share points (43% away draws).

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
12Shots16
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
4Shots on target7
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
1.33xG1.85
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
6Corners4
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
40Dangerous attacks50
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
13Fouls19
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
2Cards2
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
1.07Goals scored / game1.8
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
2.53Goals allowed / game2.13
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
43%Average possession54%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
3.27Shots on target / game5.47
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.27Shots per game14.2
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
3.27Shots on target5.47
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
11.5%Shot conversion12.7%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
43%Possession54%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
1.16xG for1.64
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
1.8xG against1.77
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

Shooting quality

Correcaminos UAT: BalancedCA La Paz: Attacking
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
Accuracy (shots on target)35%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

CA La Paz is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Correcaminos UAT · 1 pts / game - CA La Paz

Correcaminos UAT
WLLDL
Season result split
13% W27% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-9
0.67 pts / game · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
CA La Paz
LDWLD
Season result split
27% W40% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-5
1.20 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CA La Paz is 68% better for: goals scored per game.

1.07 goals / game - Correcaminos UAT · 1.8 goals / game - CA La Paz

CA La Paz is 19% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.53 goals / game - Correcaminos UAT · 2.13 goals / game - CA La Paz

Correcaminos UAT scoring profile: very strong

Correcaminos UAT scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while CA La Paz keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 meczów).

CA La Paz scoring profile: very strong

CA La Paz scores in 87% of games (13 of 15 meczów), while Correcaminos UAT keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 meczów).

16Goals scored (season)27
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
38Goals conceded (season)32
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
3.6Average goals per game3.93
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
2Goals scored (last 5)7
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
11Goals conceded (last 5)13
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal87%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
20%2 goals60%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
7%3 goals33%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
0%4 goals0%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal87%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
67%2 goals67%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
40%3 goals33%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
33%4 goals13%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

67%
Correcaminos UAT - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 15 meczów
57%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time47%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
7%BTTS in both halves27%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
7%Scored in both halves40%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
20%BTTS - last 560%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time47%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CA La Paz is 467% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.27 pts / game - Correcaminos UAT · 1.53 pts / game - CA La Paz

Correcaminos UAT - half-time state
0% leading27% draw73% trailing
CA La Paz - half-time state
47% leading13% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.27Points per game (1st half)1.53
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
0.2Goals scored (1st half)1.13
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
1.33Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
1.53Average goals (1st half)2.33
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
20%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
80%No goal before half-time20%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
2.07Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz
33%No goal after half-time53%
Correcaminos UATCA La Paz

Correcaminos UAT - second-half results

40% W13% D47% L
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-17
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.27
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CA La Paz - second-half results

13% W60% D27% L
23
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding57%

Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Correcaminos UAT - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.20
Goals scored / game0.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
CA La Paz - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game1.41.2
Average goals per game2.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Correcaminos UAT
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
0
5
16-30
1
10
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

CA La Paz
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
6
6
16-30
8
8
31-45
2
4
46-60
3
5
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.77
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
126%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Correcaminos UAT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
201%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

CA La Paz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
143%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).

Teams vs league

Correcaminos UATLigaCA La Paz
Average goals per game 3.602.99 3.93
Both teams scored 67%57% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%55% 73%
Clean sheets 13%25% 13%
Goal before half-time 80%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Correcaminos UATYellow cardAndrés Didyer Catalán Guemes
  2. Correcaminos UATSubstitutionOn: Nahum Gómez Del RosalOff: Juan Pablo Martínez Rodríguez
  3. CA La PazYellow cardIvo Saúl Vázquez Serrano
  4. CA La PazYellow cardAntonio de Jesús Soto López
  5. Correcaminos UATSubstitutionOn: Diego Iván Pineda JuárezOff: Daniel Yair Delgadillo Pulido
  6. Correcaminos UATYellow cardRonaldo De Jesús Prieto Ramírez

Head-to-head

Record from Correcaminos UAT's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against CA La Paz. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Club Atlético La Paz
1 : 1
Correcaminos UAT

FAQ

What was the result of Correcaminos UAT vs CA La Paz?

The Ascenso MX match finished Correcaminos UAT 0:3 CA La Paz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Correcaminos UAT vs CA La Paz?

Correcaminos UAT score 1.07 goals per game on average and CA La Paz 1.80. The Ascenso MX average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Correcaminos UAT's matches and 73% of CA La Paz's.

What form are Correcaminos UAT and CA La Paz in?

Over the last 5 games Correcaminos UAT have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and CA La Paz 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Correcaminos UAT vs CA La Paz?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Correcaminos UAT vs CA La Paz: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.