Mexico - Ascenso MXData current as of September 06, 2026

Correcaminos UAT vs Irapuato: match statistics

Correcaminos UAT crest
Correcaminos UAT
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Irapuato crest
Irapuato
125%(3.10)
X30%(3.40)
245%(2.10)

Irapuato appears to be the favorite in this clash despite playing away. Correcaminos UAT presents very poor home form with only an 18% home win rate and a disastrous -11 goal difference as hosts. The team loses a staggering 55% of matches in front of their home crowd, conceding an average of 2.18 goals per game. Conversely, Irapuato boasts a more solid overall record (10 wins this season) and better form in their last five matches (1.8 points per game compared to the hosts' 1.6). The visitors have much better ball possession control (52% vs 44%) and an impressive 36% clean sheets on the road. Considering Correcaminos' defensive frailties and Irapuato's superior quality and form, the visitors have a realistic chance of securing all three points, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the visitors' high rate of unresolved matches.

Correcaminos UAT vs Irapuato: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Correcaminos UAT played against Irapuato in Ascenso MX (Mexico). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Correcaminos UAT has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Irapuato has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Correcaminos UAT scores 1.05 goals per game and allows 2.14. Irapuato scores 1.64 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.93 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of Correcaminos UAT's games and 54% of Irapuato's. The Over 2.5 rates are 59% and 61%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Irapuato has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.10 per game. Correcaminos UAT takes 8.4 shots per game, while Irapuato takes 12.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Correcaminos UAT leads at halftime in 5% of its games and scores 0.73 goals per game after halftime. Irapuato leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.07 after halftime.

When the teams score

Correcaminos UAT's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Irapuato, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ascenso MX games average 2.93 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Irapuato appears to be the favorite in this clash despite playing away. Correcaminos UAT presents very poor home form with only an 18% home win rate and a disastrous -11 goal difference as hosts. The team loses a staggering 55% of matches in front of their home crowd, conceding an average of 2.18 goals per game. Conversely, Irapuato boasts a more solid overall record (10 wins this season) and better form in their last five matches (1.8 points per game compared to the hosts' 1.6). The visitors have much better ball possession control (52% vs 44%) and an impressive 36% clean sheets on the road. Considering Correcaminos' defensive frailties and Irapuato's superior quality and form, the visitors have a realistic chance of securing all three points, although a draw cannot be ruled out due to the visitors' high rate of unresolved matches.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

39Possession (%)61
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
12Shots13
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
5Shots on target4
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
1.45xG1.48
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
5Corners1
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
47Dangerous attacks52
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
7Fouls14
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
3Cards3
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Correcaminos UATIrapuato
1.05Goals scored / game1.64
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
2.14Goals allowed / game1.43
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
43%Average possession55%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
3.14Shots on target / game4.79
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.45Shots per game12.32
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
3.14Shots on target4.79
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
12.4%Shot conversion13.3%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
43%Possession55%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
1.1xG for1.55
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
1.83xG against1.41
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

Shooting quality

Correcaminos UAT: Counter-attackingIrapuato: Efficient finishing
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
Accuracy (shots on target)37%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Irapuato is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Correcaminos UAT · 1.8 pts / game - Irapuato

Correcaminos UAT
WLDDW
Season result split
18% W32% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-11
0.86 pts / game · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LLWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.83Opponent xG: 1.91BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Irapuato
WWLLW
Season result split
36% W36% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-8
1.43 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-6
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Irapuato is 56% better for: goals scored per game.

1.05 goals / game - Correcaminos UAT · 1.64 goals / game - Irapuato

Irapuato is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.14 goals / game - Correcaminos UAT · 1.43 goals / game - Irapuato

Correcaminos UAT scoring profile: very strong

Correcaminos UAT scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while Irapuato keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 meczów).

Irapuato scoring profile: very strong

Irapuato scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while Correcaminos UAT keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)46
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
47Goals conceded (season)40
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
3.18Average goals per game3.07
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
7Goals scored (last 5)13
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
6Goals conceded (last 5)9
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal71%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
23%2 goals43%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
5%3 goals21%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
0%4 goals18%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal68%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
59%2 goals39%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
32%3 goals18%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
23%4 goals14%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

64%
Correcaminos UAT - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 22 meczów
54%
League average

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time18%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
5%BTTS in both halves4%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
5%Scored in both halves29%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
80%BTTS - last 540%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Irapuato is 128% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - Correcaminos UAT · 1.14 pts / game - Irapuato

Correcaminos UAT - half-time state
5% leading36% draw59% trailing
Irapuato - half-time state
25% leading39% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)1.14
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
1.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
1.45Average goals (1st half)1.21
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
27%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
73%No goal before half-time57%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

After half-time (2nd half)

1.27Points per game (2nd half)1.61
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)1.07
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.86
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
36%Clean sheet after half-time57%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato
45%No goal after half-time43%
Correcaminos UATIrapuato

Correcaminos UAT - second-half results

36% W18% R45% P
11
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding360%

Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Irapuato - second-half results

43% W32% R25% P
32
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Correcaminos UAT - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Irapuato - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.42.2
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game0.83.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Correcaminos UAT
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
2
5
16-30
1
13
31-45
5
4
46-60
2
5
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Irapuato
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
4
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
11
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Correcaminos UAT

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

Irapuato

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ascenso MX).

Teams vs league

Correcaminos UATLigaIrapuato
Average goals per game 3.182.93 3.07
Both teams scored 64%54% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%54% 61%
Clean sheets 18%27% 32%
Goal before half-time 77%73% 71%
Goal after half-time 91%80% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.72
Home goals / game
1.20
Away goals / game
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Correcaminos UATYellow cardTomás David Sandoval
  2. Correcaminos UATYellow cardCésar Sosa Heredia
  3. Correcaminos UATYellow cardDuvan Sterling Mina Marquínez
  4. IrapuatoYellow cardRicardo Israel Peña Franco
  5. Correcaminos UATSubstitutionOn: Raymundo RubioOff: Vicente Emmanuel Torres Chiriboga
  6. Correcaminos UATGoalDaniel Yair Delgadillo Pulido

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Eduardo Reynoso MartínezMatches officiated: 10
4.9Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 240%Home wins50%Draws10%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Correcaminos UAT's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Irapuato. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Deportivo Irapuato
4 : 1
Correcaminos UAT

FAQ

What was the result of Correcaminos UAT vs Irapuato?

The Ascenso MX match finished Correcaminos UAT 2:1 Irapuato. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Correcaminos UAT vs Irapuato?

Correcaminos UAT score 1.05 goals per game on average and Irapuato 1.64. The Ascenso MX average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Correcaminos UAT's matches and 54% of Irapuato's.

What form are Correcaminos UAT and Irapuato in?

Over the last 5 games Correcaminos UAT have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Irapuato 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Correcaminos UAT vs Irapuato?

The statistical background for Correcaminos UAT vs Irapuato — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.