Corvinul Hunedoara vs Sepsi: match statistics
Corvinul Hunedoara vs Sepsi: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Corvinul Hunedoara played against Sepsi in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Corvinul Hunedoara has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Sepsi has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Corvinul Hunedoara scores 1.73 goals per game and allows 0.59. Sepsi scores 1.73 and allows 0.73. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Corvinul Hunedoara's games and 45% of Sepsi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 45%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Corvinul Hunedoara has the higher season xG average, 2.01 to 1.64 per game. Corvinul Hunedoara takes 17.2 shots per game, while Sepsi takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Corvinul Hunedoara leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Sepsi leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.05 after halftime.
When the teams score
Corvinul Hunedoara's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Sepsi, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Corvinul Hunedoara is top of the table (1st) with a record of 17 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses this season, while Sepsi sits 2nd with 14 wins, 6 draws and 2 losses. At home Corvinul averages 1.82 goals with an average xG of 2.14 and concedes only 0.73 goals per match, whereas Sepsi on the road averages 1.64 goals, xG 1.57 and concedes 0.91 goals, indicating a home advantage in chance quality and defense. The hosts average 19 shots and 6.73 on target per match with 60% possession, versus the visitors' 11.7 shots, 4.6 on target and 51% possession, so Corvinul generates significantly more chances. Sepsi, however, has a higher efficiency in chance conversion (14% on the road versus the hosts' 10%) and less frequently leave away matches goalless (9% of matches without scoring versus 18% for the hosts), so with fewer shots they can still be dangerous. Considering Corvinul's unbeaten run (0 losses), superior xG 2.14 vs 1.57 and higher possession share, I predict a home victory; suggested probabilities are 60% home, 20% draw and 20% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS=no at 70% and BTTS=yes at 30%. Corvinul at home records only 27% BTTS matches and keeps a clean sheet in 64% of games, conceding an average 0.55 goals per match, which significantly reduces the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Sepsi away has 64% BTTS matches and averages 1.64 goals scored with xG 1.57, but concedes 0.91 on average; although their xG 1.57 exceeds the opponent xG against Corvinul (1.05), the hosts actually allow fewer goals (0.55 GA), limiting the visitors' effectiveness. In the last 5 matches Corvinul scored 10 and conceded 4 (60% BTTS in that period), while Sepsi scored 12 and conceded 3 (40% BTTS), so short-term there are more scoring situations, but the season-long profile of the home side (27% BTTS, only 13 goals conceded this season) remains dominant. Additionally, the league average BTTS is 49%, both teams have 38 goals this season, and Corvinul’s defensive edge (13 vs 16 conceded) plus 64% home clean sheets argue strongly in favor of the No Goal scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model shows Corvinul with xG 1.70 and Sepsi 1.57; considering xG against opponent (Sepsi 1.68, Corvinul 1.05) I project 1.69 goals for the home side and 1.31 for the away side, totaling 3.00 goals. Season averages for goals scored are 1.82 (Corvinul) and 1.64 (Sepsi) — sum 3.46 — and in the last 5 matches the teams averaged 2.0 and 2.4 goals respectively (total 4.4), confirming higher scoring potential. Percentages of matches over 1.5 goals are 64% for Corvinul and 91% for Sepsi, so Over 1.5 is the strongest signal (I estimate 90%). Over 2.5 has moderate support: season rates 36% (Corvinul) vs 55% (Sepsi), but in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 was 60% and 80%, hence I rate Over 2.5 at about 66%. Over 3.5 remains less likely — season indicators 27% (Corvinul) and 18% (Sepsi) and the combined xG of 3.00 suggest a probability around 34%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The home side led at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and in those five games they averaged 1.2 goals by half-time while conceding 0.4, indicating a strong start. In the season Corvinul has a 73% win rate and averages 1.82 goals per match, whereas Sepsi concedes an average of 0.91 goals and allows 1.68 xG per game; the home team generates 1.70 xG. The hosts attempt 13.73 shots per match versus Sepsi’s 11.7 and keep clean halves at half-time in 91% of fixtures, which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. Although the season-long lead-at-the-break metric favors Sepsi (64% vs 36%), the current form of the hosts (last 5 matches: 80% leads at the break and 80% wins) leads me to assess a 45% probability for a 1/1 Half-Time/Full-Time scenario; alternatives are draw/home win (X/1) at approximately 18% or draw/draw at about 11%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Corvinul Hunedoara | Sepsi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Corvinul Hunedoara is 18% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Corvinul Hunedoara · 2.2 pts / game - Sepsi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Corvinul Hunedoara is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.59 goals / game - Corvinul Hunedoara · 0.73 goals / game - Sepsi
Corvinul Hunedoara scores in 82% of games (18 of 22 meczów), while Sepsi keeps a clean sheet in 50% (11 of 22 meczów).
Sepsi scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 meczów), while Corvinul Hunedoara keeps a clean sheet in 64% (14 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Corvinul Hunedoara
Over / Under - Sepsi
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Corvinul Hunedoara - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 77%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sepsi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Corvinul Hunedoara
Sepsi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Corvinul Hunedoara | Liga | Sepsi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.32 | 2.73 | ▼ 2.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 48% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 50% | ▼ 45% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 64% | 30% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 74% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 81% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Corvinul Hunedoara's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Sepsi. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Corvinul Hunedoara vs Sepsi?
The Liga II match finished Corvinul Hunedoara 0:1 Sepsi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Corvinul Hunedoara vs Sepsi?
Corvinul Hunedoara score 1.73 goals per game on average and Sepsi 1.73. The Liga II average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Corvinul Hunedoara's matches and 45% of Sepsi's.
What form are Corvinul Hunedoara and Sepsi in?
Over the last 5 games Corvinul Hunedoara have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Sepsi 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Corvinul Hunedoara vs Sepsi?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Corvinul Hunedoara vs Sepsi: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


