CR Khemis Zemamra vs Maghreb Fès: match statistics
CR Khemis Zemamra vs Maghreb Fès: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CR Khemis Zemamra played against Maghreb Fès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
CR Khemis Zemamra has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Maghreb Fès has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 1.27. Maghreb Fès scores 1.47 and allows 0.47. Games in this league average 2.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of CR Khemis Zemamra's games and 40% of Maghreb Fès's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 20%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
CR Khemis Zemamra has the higher season xG average, 1.23 to 1.15 per game. CR Khemis Zemamra takes 10.0 shots per game, while Maghreb Fès takes 8.6.
First-half and second-half trends
CR Khemis Zemamra leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Maghreb Fès leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.87 after halftime.
When the teams score
CR Khemis Zemamra's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Maghreb Fès, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.09 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Maghreb Fès is statistically stronger: they sit 2nd with an 8–7–0 record this season, scoring 22 and conceding 7, whereas CR Khemis Zemamra are 8th with a 5–4–6 record and a 14–19 goal differential. The home side display a solid defensive profile at home — conceding only 0.57 goals per home game on average and posting a 57% clean sheet rate while averaging 0.71 goals scored. The visitors, however, are more efficient offensively: their shot conversion on the road is 14% versus 8% for the hosts, they average 3.25 shots on target per match compared to 2.86, and they have a lower share of goalless matches (25% vs 43%). In the last 5 fixtures both teams have scored 7 goals each, but Maghreb Fès has a higher point yield in that sequence (2.2 pts/match vs 1.6), while both teams feature a high draw rate (hosts 57% draws at home, visitors 63% draws away). Therefore the most likely outcome I select is a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back No BTTS because the strongest signal is the home defensive setup — CR Khemis Zemamra concedes just 0.43 goals per home match and has kept a clean sheet in 71% of home games, while their season rate of matches with both teams scoring is only 29%. The away side averages 1.13 goals scored away and concedes 0.5 away, so their ability to breach the hosts’ solid defense is moderate. Counterpoint: form over the last 5 matches shows BTTS in 60% for both teams and each side has scored 7 goals in their last five games, with home xG 1.34 versus away 1.01, indicating some goal potential. However, higher home efficiency (conversion rate 20% vs 14%) and the dominant home clean sheet rate (71%) prevail, making No BTTS the more likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects approximately 2.36 total goals: home ~1.26 (attacking xG 1.34 vs opponent defensive xG 1.17) and away ~1.10 (attacking xG 1.01 vs home defensive xG 1.19). Seasonal stats indicate a low probability of Over 2.5 — Over 2.5 occurred in only 29% of home matches and 13% of away matches, meaning the majority (71% and 87%) finished under 2.5. Additionally, hosts have 71% clean sheets and concede an average of 0.43 goals at home, while visitors concede 0.5 on the road, which suppresses scoring. Although the home side shows higher shot conversion (20% vs 14%) and averages 1.86 goals at home, the low league average of 2.12 and virtually no Over 3.5 for visitors (0%) strengthen the under 2.5 signal. Therefore I recommend under 2.5 as the strongest line; over 1.5 remains plausible (~68%) but is less certain than under 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
CR Khemis Zemamra holds a clear advantage: the home side win 71% of matches at home and score an average of 1.86 goals per game versus Maghreb Fès’s 1.13. At half-time the hosts lead in 57% of matches (4 of those so far), with an average of 0.71 goals scored and only 0.14 conceded by the break, while the visitors average 0.5 scored and 0.25 conceded by half-time. Supporting this is an xG of 1.34 for the home side against 1.01 for the visitors, alongside 4.14 shots on target vs 3.25 and a higher conversion rate of 20% vs 14%, which increases the chance of maintaining the lead. The hosts also record clean sheets in 71% of the season, so the most likely scenario is 1/1 (lead at the break and Full-Time victory). I assign concrete probabilities: 45% for 1/1, 27% for X/1 and 15% for X/X; scenarios starting with a visitors’ lead (2/...) are practically absent in the data and were assigned 0%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CR Khemis Zemamra | Maghreb Fès | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Maghreb Fès is 38% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - CR Khemis Zemamra · 2.2 pts / game - Maghreb Fès
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maghreb Fès is 58% better for: goals scored per game.
0.93 goals / game - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.47 goals / game - Maghreb Fès
Maghreb Fès is 170% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.27 goals / game - CR Khemis Zemamra · 0.47 goals / game - Maghreb Fès
CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Maghreb Fès keeps a clean sheet in 60% (9 of 15 meczów).
Maghreb Fès scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CR Khemis Zemamra
Over / Under - Maghreb Fès
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maghreb Fès is 73% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.73 pts / game - Maghreb Fès
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Maghreb Fès - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CR Khemis Zemamra
Maghreb Fès
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| CR Khemis Zemamra | Liga | Maghreb Fès | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.20 | 2.09 | ▼ 1.93 |
| Both teams scored | • 47% | 47% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 35% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 33% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from CR Khemis Zemamra's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Maghreb Fès. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of CR Khemis Zemamra vs Maghreb Fès?
The Botola Pro match finished CR Khemis Zemamra 1:2 Maghreb Fès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CR Khemis Zemamra vs Maghreb Fès?
CR Khemis Zemamra score 0.93 goals per game on average and Maghreb Fès 1.47. The Botola Pro average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 47% of CR Khemis Zemamra's matches and 40% of Maghreb Fès's.
What form are CR Khemis Zemamra and Maghreb Fès in?
Over the last 5 games CR Khemis Zemamra have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Maghreb Fès 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CR Khemis Zemamra vs Maghreb Fès?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for CR Khemis Zemamra vs Maghreb Fès: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


