Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 24 July 2026

CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

CR Khemis Zemamra crest
CR Khemis Zemamra
0 : 1half-time 0:1
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

CR Khemis Zemamra play UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 9 June 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

CR Khemis Zemamra: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. UTS Rabat: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.97 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. UTS Rabat scores 1.07 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: CR Khemis Zemamra 53%, UTS Rabat 63%. Over 2.5: CR Khemis Zemamra 43%, UTS Rabat 33%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

CR Khemis Zemamra has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.30. CR Khemis Zemamra: 10.4 shots per match, UTS Rabat: 9.5.

Match halves

CR Khemis Zemamra: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.67. UTS Rabat: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

CR Khemis Zemamra: 61-75 (8 goals). UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

CR Khemis Zemamra (8th) holds a clear edge over UTS Rabat (14th), reflected in season numbers: the home side have 8 wins versus the visitors' just 2. At home CR Khemis Zemamra concede on average 0.64 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 55% of games, while UTS Rabat concede 1.5 goals on average away and have recorded no clean sheets. Offensively the sides are comparable — hosts score 0.82 goals at home with an xG of 1.15, visitors score 1.1 goals away with an xG of 1.37; the visitors register more shots on target (4.2 vs 2.55) and have an 11% conversion rate versus the hosts' 9%. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 5 goals and recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (2.0 points per game), whereas the visitors also scored 5 goals but lost 3 of 5 and average only 0.8 points per game, which favors the home side. Given the markedly better defense (0.64 vs 1.5 goals conceded) and superior points tempo, I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
10Shots12
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3Shots on target5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.39xG1.48
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
7Corners4
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
75Dangerous attacks52
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
6Fouls14
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1Cards4
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.97Goals scored / match1.07
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.2Goals conceded / match1.33
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
47%Average possession47%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3.4Shots on target / match4.03
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match9.5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3.4Shots on target4.03
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
9.3%Shot conversion11.2%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
47%Possession47%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.32xG for1.3
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.29xG against1.35
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

CR Khemis Zemamra: BalancedUTS Rabat: Balanced
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)33%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTS Rabat is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.4 pts / match - UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra
LDDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
UTS Rabat
LLDWW
Season result split
20% W43% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-13-11
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-6-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

UTS Rabat is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

0.97 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.07 goals / match - UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.33 goals / match - UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: very strong

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: very strong

UTS Rabat scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

29Goals scored (season)32
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
36Goals conceded (season)40
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
2.17Average goals in match2.4
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3Goals scored (last 5)6
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal73%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
27%2 goals27%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
7%3 goals7%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal87%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
30%2 goals30%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
13%3 goals10%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3%4 goals7%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time27%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3%BTTS in both halves7%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
17%Scored in both halves13%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
60%BTTS - last 560%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / match - CR Khemis Zemamra · 1.17 pts / match - UTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
13% leading50% draw37% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per match (1st half)1.17
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.3Goals scored (1st half)0.5
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.87Average goals (1st half)1.07
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
50%Clean sheet before half-time57%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
73%No goal before half-time63%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.03
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
1.3Average goals (2nd half)1.33
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
50%Clean sheet after half-time37%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat
47%No goal after half-time50%
CR Khemis ZemamraUTS Rabat

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

30% W43% R27% P
27
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

20% W43% R37% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
11
31-45
4
1
46-60
8
6
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
11
31-45
5
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

CR Khemis ZemamraLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals in match 2.172.17 2.40
Both teams scored 53%52% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%38% 33%
Clean sheets 27%30% 13%
Goal before half-time 63%63% 53%
Goal after half-time 70%73% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: CR Khemis Zemamra 1 - 0 - 0 UTS Rabat. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

UTS Rabat
1 : 2
CR Khemis Zemamra

FAQ

What was the result of CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished CR Khemis Zemamra 0:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?

CR Khemis Zemamra score 0.97 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.07. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 53% of CR Khemis Zemamra's matches and 63% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are CR Khemis Zemamra and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games CR Khemis Zemamra have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CR Khemis Zemamra vs UTS Rabat?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.