England - EFL League TwoData current as of September 11, 2026

Crawley Town vs Gillingham: match statistics

Crawley Town crest
Crawley Town
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Gillingham crest
Gillingham
135%(2.41)
X35%(3.50)
230%(2.80)

The match promises to be an even contest between two teams in poor form. Crawley Town sits in 21st place in the table and has not won any of its last 5 matches, scoring only 3 goals in that period. Gillingham is positioned slightly higher in 16th place, but is also going through a crisis - it has not won any of its last 5 games, conceding as many as 15 goals. The hosts have an advantage in ball possession (61% vs 46%) and better expected goals in home matches (xG 1.59 vs xGA 1.39), while the visitors are characterized by a high percentage of away matches without scoring a goal (39%). Taking into account the poor form of both teams and Crawley's high percentage of draws at home (42%), the most likely scenario seems to be a share of the points, although the hosts have a slight advantage due to playing in front of their own fans.

Crawley Town vs Gillingham: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Crawley Town played against Gillingham in EFL League Two (England). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Crawley Town has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Gillingham has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Crawley Town scores 0.92 goals per game and allows 1.54. Gillingham scores 1.16 and allows 1.47. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 49% of Crawley Town's games and 55% of Gillingham's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 45%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Gillingham has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.47 per game. Crawley Town takes 13.5 shots per game, while Gillingham takes 13.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Crawley Town leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Gillingham leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.76 after halftime.

When the teams score

Crawley Town's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Gillingham, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League Two games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be an even contest between two teams in poor form. Crawley Town sits in 21st place in the table and has not won any of its last 5 matches, scoring only 3 goals in that period. Gillingham is positioned slightly higher in 16th place, but is also going through a crisis - it has not won any of its last 5 games, conceding as many as 15 goals. The hosts have an advantage in ball possession (61% vs 46%) and better expected goals in home matches (xG 1.59 vs xGA 1.39), while the visitors are characterized by a high percentage of away matches without scoring a goal (39%). Taking into account the poor form of both teams and Crawley's high percentage of draws at home (42%), the most likely scenario seems to be a share of the points, although the hosts have a slight advantage due to playing in front of their own fans.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Crawley has a high seasonal BTTS rate (70%), but their recent offensive efficiency in the last 5 matches has dropped to 0.6 goals per game (3 goals total), which lowers the probability of both teams scoring. Gillingham also scores only 0.6 goals per game in their last 5 matches, and seasonally, they have a high FTS rate (39%), meaning they often fail to score. Although Crawley's defense is vulnerable (1.6 goals conceded per game this season, only 15% clean sheets), and Gillingham has been conceding heavily in their last 5 matches (averaging 3.0), the key risk for BTTS remains the visitors' potential failure to score. xG data (Crawley xG for 1.71 vs Gillingham xG against 1.50) suggests that the hosts should score, while Gillingham's goal-scoring chance is less stable due to poor attacking form. Consequently, the option that not both teams will score holds slightly greater value.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Crawley generates high xG at home (1.71) and takes many shots (15.0) with a high number on target (5.35), while Gillingham has elevated xG against away from home (1.50), supporting the scenario of at least 2 goals. Additionally, Crawley rarely keeps a clean sheet (15%) and concedes an average of 1.60 goals at home, so the visitors also have a realistic chance to add a goal (xG_for away 1.30). Seasonal statistics strongly favor the 1.5 line: Over 1.5 occurs in 80% of Crawley's home matches and 56% of Gillingham's away matches, with Over 0.5 almost certain (100% vs 94%). In the short term, Gillingham's defense looks very weak (3.0 goals conceded per match in the last 5; 15 conceded), which raises the goal projection for the hosts. At the same time, Under 3.5 remains more likely than Over 3.5, as both teams have moderate Over 3.5 frequencies (30% and 28%) and average efficiency (8–9%), therefore, the best and most reliable option is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal for halftime is a draw: Crawley has a 45% draw rate at HT, and Gillingham as high as 56%, coupled with low goal production in the first half (scoredAVGHT: 0.50 vs 0.28) and a very frequent lack of goals before the break in the hosts' last 5 matches (last5 scoredAVGHT = 0.0; last5 FTS%HT = 100%). After the break, the likelihood of a decisive outcome increases, as both teams perform noticeably stronger in the second halves (over0.5 in the second half: 85% Crawley, 78% Gillingham). Crawley's case is supported by better creation metrics (xG for 1.71 vs 1.30) and an advantage in shots on target (5.35 vs 3.11), which raises the chances of tilting the match after HT. Additionally, Gillingham's away form is poor: in their last 5 matches, they average 0.2 PPG and concede as many as 3.0 goals per match, favoring the scenario of a draw at the break and a home win by the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
Crawley TownGillingham
9Shots11
Crawley TownGillingham
5Shots on target3
Crawley TownGillingham
1.17xG1.19
Crawley TownGillingham
2Corners7
Crawley TownGillingham
34Dangerous attacks38
Crawley TownGillingham
10Fouls21
Crawley TownGillingham
1Cards3
Crawley TownGillingham

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Crawley TownGillingham
0.92Goals scored / game1.16
Crawley TownGillingham
1.54Goals allowed / game1.47
Crawley TownGillingham
58%Average possession47%
Crawley TownGillingham
4.23Shots on target / game4.29
Crawley TownGillingham

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.49Shots per game13.39
Crawley TownGillingham
4.23Shots on target4.29
Crawley TownGillingham
6.8%Shot conversion8.6%
Crawley TownGillingham
58%Possession47%
Crawley TownGillingham
1.47xG for1.52
Crawley TownGillingham
1.47xG against1.42
Crawley TownGillingham

Shooting quality

Crawley Town: BalancedGillingham: Balanced
Crawley TownGillingham
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Crawley Town is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Crawley Town · 0.2 pts / game - Gillingham

Crawley Town
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
15% W33% D51% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-13-20
0.79 pts / game · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-7
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LLDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Gillingham
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
29% W32% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-15
1.18 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gillingham is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

0.92 goals / game - Crawley Town · 1.16 goals / game - Gillingham

Gillingham is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.54 goals / game - Crawley Town · 1.47 goals / game - Gillingham

Crawley Town scoring profile: strong

Crawley Town scores in 62% of games (24 of 39 meczów), while Gillingham keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 38 meczów).

Gillingham scoring profile: very strong

Gillingham scores in 74% of games (28 of 38 meczów), while Crawley Town keeps a clean sheet in 21% (8 of 39 meczów).

36Goals scored (season)44
Crawley TownGillingham
60Goals conceded (season)56
Crawley TownGillingham
2.46Average goals per game2.63
Crawley TownGillingham
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Crawley TownGillingham
6Goals conceded (last 5)15
Crawley TownGillingham

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal74%
Crawley TownGillingham
23%2 goals26%
Crawley TownGillingham
5%3 goals13%
Crawley TownGillingham
3%4 goals3%
Crawley TownGillingham

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal79%
Crawley TownGillingham
49%2 goals39%
Crawley TownGillingham
21%3 goals16%
Crawley TownGillingham
5%4 goals8%
Crawley TownGillingham

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time16%
Crawley TownGillingham
3%BTTS in both halves3%
Crawley TownGillingham
13%Scored in both halves13%
Crawley TownGillingham

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Crawley TownGillingham
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Crawley TownGillingham
40%BTTS - last 560%
Crawley TownGillingham

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Crawley TownGillingham
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Crawley TownGillingham
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Crawley TownGillingham

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Crawley TownGillingham
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Crawley TownGillingham
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Crawley TownGillingham

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Crawley Town is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / game - Crawley Town · 1.05 pts / game - Gillingham

Crawley Town - half-time state
21% leading51% draw28% trailing
Gillingham - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per game (1st half)1.05
Crawley TownGillingham
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.39
Crawley TownGillingham
0.49Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
Crawley TownGillingham
0.85Average goals (1st half)1.05
Crawley TownGillingham
59%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Crawley TownGillingham
67%No goal before half-time68%
Crawley TownGillingham

After half-time (2nd half)

0.87Points per game (2nd half)1.32
Crawley TownGillingham
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Crawley TownGillingham
1.05Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Crawley TownGillingham
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.58
Crawley TownGillingham
36%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Crawley TownGillingham
59%No goal after half-time45%
Crawley TownGillingham

Crawley Town - second-half results

21% W26% D54% L
44
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding71%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Gillingham - second-half results

32% W37% D32% L
40
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Crawley Town - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.60
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.21.6
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Gillingham - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.20
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game1.02.0
Average goals per game1.22.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-4-8
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Crawley Town
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
2
4
16-30
9
10
31-45
4
16
46-60
8
12
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Gillingham
ScoredConceded
1
12
0-15
7
10
16-30
7
3
31-45
9
12
46-60
6
6
61-75
14
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Crawley Town

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Gillingham

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.98
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 2% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

Crawley TownLigaGillingham
Average goals per game 2.462.55 2.63
Both teams scored 49%52% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%47% 45%
Clean sheets 21%27% 21%
Goal before half-time 62%67% 55%
Goal after half-time 82%77% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / game
1.21
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GillinghamYellow cardBradley Dack
  2. Crawley TownSubstitutionOn: Harry McKirdyOff: Danilo Orsi-Dadamo
  3. GillinghamYellow cardJosh Andrews
  4. GillinghamYellow cardAaron Rowe
  5. Crawley TownYellow cardJay Williams
  6. Crawley TownSubstitutionOn: Akinwale Joseph OdimayoOff: Lewis Richards
  7. Crawley TownGoalTaylor RichardsAssist: Max Anderson
  8. Crawley TownGoalToby AdeyemoAssist: Harry Forster

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Edward DuckworthMatches officiated: 11
4.55Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 273%Home wins9%Draws18%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Crawley Town's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Gillingham. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Gillingham FC
2 : 2
Crawley Town FC

FAQ

What was the result of Crawley Town vs Gillingham?

The EFL League Two match finished Crawley Town 2:0 Gillingham. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Crawley Town vs Gillingham?

Crawley Town score 0.92 goals per game on average and Gillingham 1.16. The EFL League Two average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 49% of Crawley Town's matches and 55% of Gillingham's.

What form are Crawley Town and Gillingham in?

Over the last 5 games Crawley Town have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Gillingham 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Crawley Town vs Gillingham?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.