Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipData current as of September 12, 2026

Crusaders vs Cliftonville: match statistics

Crusaders crest
Crusaders
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Cliftonville crest
Cliftonville
120%(3.82)
X25%(3.90)
255%(1.76)

Cliftonville clearly outperforms Crusaders in terms of form and quality of play. The hosts sit 11th in the table with a mere 14% home win rate and disastrous form – zero wins in their last 5 matches and a -13 goal difference in home games. Crusaders have lost 4 of their last 5 fixtures, conceding a staggering 18 goals. Conversely, Cliftonville (6th place) is in excellent disposition with 4 wins in their last 5 matches and 2.4 points per game. The visitors boast significantly better efficiency (only a 15% FTS% vs the hosts' 43%), a superior defense (1.46 vs 2.21 average goals conceded), and higher ball possession (53% vs 50%). Given such a massive disparity in form and quality, a Cliftonville victory is the most probable scenario for this matchup.

Crusaders vs Cliftonville: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Crusaders played against Cliftonville in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The game was played on March 10, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Crusaders has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Cliftonville has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Crusaders scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 2.27. Cliftonville scores 1.59 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 53% of Crusaders's games and 62% of Cliftonville's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 59%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cliftonville has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.21 per game. Crusaders takes 9.6 shots per game, while Cliftonville takes 11.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Crusaders leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Cliftonville leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.97 after halftime.

When the teams score

Crusaders's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Cliftonville, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NIFL Premiership games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cliftonville clearly outperforms Crusaders in terms of form and quality of play. The hosts sit 11th in the table with a mere 14% home win rate and disastrous form – zero wins in their last 5 matches and a -13 goal difference in home games. Crusaders have lost 4 of their last 5 fixtures, conceding a staggering 18 goals. Conversely, Cliftonville (6th place) is in excellent disposition with 4 wins in their last 5 matches and 2.4 points per game. The visitors boast significantly better efficiency (only a 15% FTS% vs the hosts' 43%), a superior defense (1.46 vs 2.21 average goals conceded), and higher ball possession (53% vs 50%). Given such a massive disparity in form and quality, a Cliftonville victory is the most probable scenario for this matchup.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

27Possession (%)73
CrusadersCliftonville
3Shots21
CrusadersCliftonville
0Shots on target8
CrusadersCliftonville
0.43xG2.46
CrusadersCliftonville
1Corners7
CrusadersCliftonville
31Dangerous attacks79
CrusadersCliftonville
16Fouls9
CrusadersCliftonville
0Cards0
CrusadersCliftonville

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

CrusadersCliftonville
1.27Goals scored / game1.59
CrusadersCliftonville
2.27Goals allowed / game1.45
CrusadersCliftonville
48%Average possession53%
CrusadersCliftonville
3.53Shots on target / game4.52
CrusadersCliftonville

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.6Shots per game11.86
CrusadersCliftonville
3.53Shots on target4.52
CrusadersCliftonville
13.2%Shot conversion13.4%
CrusadersCliftonville
48%Possession53%
CrusadersCliftonville
1.21xG for1.45
CrusadersCliftonville
1.99xG against1.48
CrusadersCliftonville

Shooting quality

Crusaders: Efficient finishingCliftonville: Efficient finishing
CrusadersCliftonville
Accuracy (shots on target)37%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cliftonville is 800% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - Crusaders · 1.8 pts / game - Cliftonville

Crusaders
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
23% W13% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-19
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-9
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Cliftonville
LWLWW
Season result split
41% W24% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-7-10
1.48 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cliftonville is 25% better for: goals scored per game.

1.27 goals / game - Crusaders · 1.59 goals / game - Cliftonville

Cliftonville is 57% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.27 goals / game - Crusaders · 1.45 goals / game - Cliftonville

Crusaders scoring profile: strong

Crusaders scores in 63% of games (19 of 30 meczów), while Cliftonville keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 meczów).

Cliftonville scoring profile: very strong

Cliftonville scores in 79% of games (23 of 29 meczów), while Crusaders keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 30 meczów).

38Goals scored (season)46
CrusadersCliftonville
68Goals conceded (season)42
CrusadersCliftonville
3.53Average goals per game3.03
CrusadersCliftonville
7Goals scored (last 5)11
CrusadersCliftonville
18Goals conceded (last 5)9
CrusadersCliftonville

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal79%
CrusadersCliftonville
47%2 goals45%
CrusadersCliftonville
13%3 goals21%
CrusadersCliftonville
3%4 goals7%
CrusadersCliftonville

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal72%
CrusadersCliftonville
63%2 goals52%
CrusadersCliftonville
33%3 goals14%
CrusadersCliftonville
30%4 goals7%
CrusadersCliftonville

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time24%
CrusadersCliftonville
7%BTTS in both halves10%
CrusadersCliftonville
33%Scored in both halves28%
CrusadersCliftonville

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
CrusadersCliftonville
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
CrusadersCliftonville
80%BTTS - last 540%
CrusadersCliftonville

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
CrusadersCliftonville
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
CrusadersCliftonville
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
CrusadersCliftonville

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
CrusadersCliftonville
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
CrusadersCliftonville
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
CrusadersCliftonville

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cliftonville is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / game - Crusaders · 1.31 pts / game - Cliftonville

Crusaders - half-time state
33% leading10% draw57% trailing
Cliftonville - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)1.31
CrusadersCliftonville
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.62
CrusadersCliftonville
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
CrusadersCliftonville
1.57Average goals (1st half)1.31
CrusadersCliftonville
33%Clean sheet before half-time48%
CrusadersCliftonville
57%No goal before half-time52%
CrusadersCliftonville

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per game (2nd half)1.52
CrusadersCliftonville
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.97
CrusadersCliftonville
1.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
CrusadersCliftonville
1.97Average goals (2nd half)1.72
CrusadersCliftonville
30%Clean sheet after half-time48%
CrusadersCliftonville
47%No goal after half-time41%
CrusadersCliftonville

Crusaders - second-half results

23% W33% D43% L
33
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-21
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding70%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 23%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cliftonville - second-half results

38% W38% D24% L
38
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Crusaders - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.60
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game1.22.4
Average goals per game1.63.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals40%80%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4-7
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Cliftonville - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.80
Goals scored / game0.81.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game1.22.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Crusaders
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
5
5
16-30
9
15
31-45
8
12
46-60
5
8
61-75
6
20
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -14 - late phases are a weakness.

Cliftonville
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
5
8
16-30
7
10
31-45
9
4
46-60
6
9
61-75
13
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.29
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Crusaders

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.78
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
175%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Cliftonville

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

CrusadersLigaCliftonville
Average goals per game 3.532.88 3.03
Both teams scored 53%51% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%54% 59%
Clean sheets 10%26% 28%
Goal before half-time 90%76% 76%
Goal after half-time 87%78% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / game
1.30
Away goals / game
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CliftonvilleGoalJoe Gormley

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Tim MarshallMatches officiated: 13
2.92Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 246%Home wins0%Draws54%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Crusaders's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Cliftonville. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Crusaders vs Cliftonville?

The NIFL Premiership match finished Crusaders 0:1 Cliftonville. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Crusaders and Cliftonville?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Crusaders won 1, Cliftonville won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Crusaders vs Cliftonville?

Crusaders score 1.27 goals per game on average and Cliftonville 1.59. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Crusaders's matches and 62% of Cliftonville's.

What form are Crusaders and Cliftonville in?

Over the last 5 games Crusaders have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Cliftonville 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Crusaders vs Cliftonville?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.