Northern Ireland - NIFL PremiershipData current as of September 12, 2026

Crusaders vs Dungannon Swifts: match statistics

Crusaders crest
Crusaders
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Dungannon Swifts crest
Dungannon Swifts
120%(2.90)
X25%(3.35)
255%(2.20)

Dungannon Swifts display decidedly superior form, backed by recent results: 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 fixtures (2.6 points per game), whereas Crusaders have managed just 1 win and suffered 3 defeats (0.8 points per game). The hosts languish in 10th place with a catastrophic home record, featuring a 70% loss rate on their own turf and conceding an average of 2.4 goals per game while scoring just 1.2. Sitting in 4th position, Dungannon Swifts demonstrate solidity on the road with a 45% away win rate and 36% clean sheets, conceding an average of just 1.55 goals. The xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.23 xG For vs 1.21 xG For the hosts), and their 5-match unbeaten run provides a psychological edge. Considering all metrics, Dungannon Swifts are the clear favorites for this encounter.

Crusaders vs Dungannon Swifts: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Crusaders played against Dungannon Swifts in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The game was played on January 3, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Crusaders has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Dungannon Swifts has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Crusaders scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 2.00. Dungannon Swifts scores 1.32 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Crusaders's games and 36% of Dungannon Swifts's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Dungannon Swifts has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.20 per game. Crusaders takes 9.9 shots per game, while Dungannon Swifts takes 10.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Crusaders leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. Dungannon Swifts leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.45 after halftime.

When the teams score

Crusaders's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Dungannon Swifts, it is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NIFL Premiership games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dungannon Swifts display decidedly superior form, backed by recent results: 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 fixtures (2.6 points per game), whereas Crusaders have managed just 1 win and suffered 3 defeats (0.8 points per game). The hosts languish in 10th place with a catastrophic home record, featuring a 70% loss rate on their own turf and conceding an average of 2.4 goals per game while scoring just 1.2. Sitting in 4th position, Dungannon Swifts demonstrate solidity on the road with a 45% away win rate and 36% clean sheets, conceding an average of just 1.55 goals. The xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.23 xG For vs 1.21 xG For the hosts), and their 5-match unbeaten run provides a psychological edge. Considering all metrics, Dungannon Swifts are the clear favorites for this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
14Shots22
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
4Shots on target5
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
1.43xG2.12
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
6Corners7
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
39Dangerous attacks56
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
17Fouls9
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
1Cards1
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

CrusadersDungannon Swifts
1.27Goals scored / game1.32
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
2Goals allowed / game1.45
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
51%Average possession53%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
3.41Shots on target / game4.55
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.86Shots per game10.82
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
3.41Shots on target4.55
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
12.9%Shot conversion12.2%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
51%Possession53%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
1.2xG for1.52
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
1.93xG against1.31
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

Shooting quality

Crusaders: BalancedDungannon Swifts: Balanced
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
Accuracy (shots on target)35%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Dungannon Swifts is 225% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Crusaders · 2.6 pts / game - Dungannon Swifts

Crusaders
LLLWD
Season result split
27% W14% D59% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-13
0.95 pts / game · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Dungannon Swifts
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
55% W5% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-1-9
1.68 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-5
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LWWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dungannon Swifts is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.

2 goals / game - Crusaders · 1.45 goals / game - Dungannon Swifts

Crusaders scoring profile: mixed

Crusaders scores in 59% of games (13 of 22 meczów), while Dungannon Swifts keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).

Dungannon Swifts scoring profile: very strong

Dungannon Swifts scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 meczów), while Crusaders keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 22 meczów).

28Goals scored (season)29
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
44Goals conceded (season)32
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
3.27Average goals per game2.77
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
4Goals scored (last 5)11
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
12Goals conceded (last 5)6
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal73%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
45%2 goals41%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
18%3 goals14%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
5%4 goals5%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal64%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
59%2 goals50%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
27%3 goals23%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
23%4 goals9%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time23%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
0%BTTS in both halves5%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
32%Scored in both halves9%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
40%BTTS - last 560%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dungannon Swifts is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / game - Crusaders · 1.36 pts / game - Dungannon Swifts

Crusaders - half-time state
36% leading9% draw55% trailing
Dungannon Swifts - half-time state
32% leading41% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per game (1st half)1.36
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.86
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
1.64Average goals (1st half)1.55
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
32%Clean sheet before half-time55%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
59%No goal before half-time45%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per game (2nd half)1.05
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
1.05Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.23
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
32%Clean sheet after half-time55%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts
50%No goal after half-time73%
CrusadersDungannon Swifts

Crusaders - second-half results

23% W41% D36% L
26
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Dungannon Swifts - second-half results

23% W36% D41% L
30
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Crusaders - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game1.21.2
Average goals per game1.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Dungannon Swifts - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game1.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+50
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Crusaders
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
4
16-30
6
13
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
5
61-75
4
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Dungannon Swifts
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
7
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Crusaders

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
164%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Dungannon Swifts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.92
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).

Teams vs league

CrusadersLigaDungannon Swifts
Average goals per game 3.272.70 2.77
Both teams scored 50%48% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%52% 50%
Clean sheets 9%27% 36%
Goal before half-time 91%75% 77%
Goal after half-time 86%77% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / game
1.22
Away goals / game
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CrusadersGoalFinley Thorndike
  2. CrusadersGoalFraser Bryden
  3. Dungannon SwiftsSubstitutionOn: James KnowlesOff: Caolan Marron
  4. CrusadersYellow cardJosh Williamson
  5. Dungannon SwiftsSubstitutionOn: Brandon BerminghamOff: Kealan Dillon
  6. CrusadersSubstitutionOn: Stewart NixonOff: Josh Williamson
  7. Dungannon SwiftsSubstitutionOn: Eoghán LiggettOff: Peter Maguire
  8. Dungannon SwiftsYellow cardJames Knowles
  9. Dungannon SwiftsYellow cardPeter Maguire

Head-to-head

Record from Crusaders's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Dungannon Swifts. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Dungannon Swifts FC
2 : 0
Crusaders FC
Dungannon Swifts FC
0 : 3
Crusaders FC

FAQ

What was the result of Crusaders vs Dungannon Swifts?

The NIFL Premiership match finished Crusaders 2:0 Dungannon Swifts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Crusaders and Dungannon Swifts?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Crusaders won 1, Dungannon Swifts won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Crusaders vs Dungannon Swifts?

Crusaders score 1.27 goals per game on average and Dungannon Swifts 1.32. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Crusaders's matches and 36% of Dungannon Swifts's.

What form are Crusaders and Dungannon Swifts in?

Over the last 5 games Crusaders have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Dungannon Swifts 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Crusaders vs Dungannon Swifts?

The statistical background for Crusaders vs Dungannon Swifts — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.