CS Dinamo București vs Slatina: match statistics
CS Dinamo București vs Slatina: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CS Dinamo București played against Slatina in Liga II (Romania). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
CS Dinamo București has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Slatina has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
CS Dinamo București scores 0.96 goals per game and allows 1.67. Slatina scores 1.42 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.69 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of CS Dinamo București's games and 63% of Slatina's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Slatina has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.26 per game. CS Dinamo București takes 9.4 shots per game, while Slatina takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
CS Dinamo București leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Slatina leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.92 after halftime.
When the teams score
CS Dinamo București's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Slatina, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga II games average 2.69 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Slatina is the favorite: the visitors average 1.67 goals away, while Dinamo scores only 0.92 at home; in the last 5 matches Slatina have 11 goals versus Dinamo’s 8. The visitors create more chances — on average 12.45 shots and 4.27 on target per game with a 13% conversion, while the hosts register 10.17 shots, 3.83 on target and a 9% conversion, giving Slatina an edge in attacking quality. In recent form Slatina average 2.0 points over the last 5 matches (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), and Dinamo 1.2 points (2 wins, 3 losses), so the visitors are more efficient. Dinamo fail to score in 50% of home games and have only a 17% home win rate; although they concede 1.08 goals per home game and keep 25% clean sheets, their average xG against of 1.78 suggests opponents create plenty of chances that Slatina (xG For 1.7) can exploit. Due to higher efficiency, greater chance volume and better recent results, I predict a Slatina win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 72% vs 28%, because both teams’ offensive and defensive signals strongly support goal exchange. Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for CS Dinamo and 75% for Slatina, with a league average of 48%, which already favors both teams to score. In the last 5 matches Dinamo has BTTS at 40% and averages 1.6 scored and 1.6 conceded, while Slatina has 80% BTTS and averages 2.2 scored and 1.2 conceded, so Slatina is clearly more dangerous in attack and Dinamo recently susceptible to concessions. xG metrics confirm this: in the last 5 Dinamo had xG_for 1.27 and xG_against 1.82, and Slatina xG_for 1.81 and xG_against 1.10, suggesting Slatina will create chances against a vulnerable Dinamo defense. Additionally Slatina has better shot conversion 13% vs 8% for Dinamo, seasonal goals 34 (Slatina) vs 23 (Dinamo), and Dinamo has conceded 40 goals and has 33% clean sheets vs just 8% for Slatina — all of which increases the likelihood that both teams will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects 1.52 goals for Dinamo and 1.54 for Slatina (total 3.06), clearly above the league average of 2.69 and indicating a higher-scoring game. Both sides show high xG values: Dinamo xG_for 1.56 vs Slatina xG_for 1.70, while conceding 1.38 (Dinamo) and 1.47 (Slatina), so the offensive/defensive balance favors goals. Seasonal stats show Over 1.5 in 75% of Dinamo’s matches and 92% of Slatina’s matches, and in Slatina’s last 5 fixtures Over 2.5 occurred in 80% (Dinamo 40%), increasing the likelihood of at least 2 goals. Slatina averages 1.67 goals and has a higher conversion rate at 13% versus Dinamo’s 8%, and BTTS is 75% for the visitors and 50% for the hosts, so a both-teams-to-score scenario and Over 1.5 is the strongest outcome. Over 2.5 remains possible (~59%) due to the visitors’ form, while Over 3.5 is less likely (37%) given Dinamo’s low season percentage for >2.5 (25%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Dinamo holds the advantage in the first half: they lead at the break in 42% of matches, score an average of 0.58 goals and concede only 0.33, and record an average of 1.58 points at half-time versus 0.92 for Slatina. However, Slatina is significantly more dangerous after the break — the visitors average 1.83 second-half goals compared to the hosts’ 1.17, their xG is 1.70 versus 1.56 for Dinamo, and shot conversion rate is 13% vs 8%. Additionally, Slatina were losing at half-time in 58% of matches, indicating frequent comebacks and a higher likelihood of a turnaround after the break. As a result, the strongest signal is a home lead at half-time with an away win at full-time (HT/FT 1/2), and I assign the highest probability to this scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CS Dinamo București | Slatina | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Slatina is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - CS Dinamo București · 2 pts / game - Slatina
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Slatina is 48% better for: goals scored per game.
0.96 goals / game - CS Dinamo București · 1.42 goals / game - Slatina
Slatina is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - CS Dinamo București · 1.25 goals / game - Slatina
CS Dinamo București scores in 54% of games (13 of 24 meczów), while Slatina keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 meczów).
Slatina scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 meczów), while CS Dinamo București keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CS Dinamo București
Over / Under - Slatina
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Slatina is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.79 pts / game - CS Dinamo București · 1.25 pts / game - Slatina
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CS Dinamo București - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Slatina - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CS Dinamo București
Slatina
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| CS Dinamo București | Liga | Slatina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.63 | 2.69 | • 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 48% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 30% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 81% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from CS Dinamo București's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Slatina. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of CS Dinamo București vs Slatina?
The Liga II match finished CS Dinamo București 1:2 Slatina. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CS Dinamo București vs Slatina?
CS Dinamo București score 0.96 goals per game on average and Slatina 1.42. The Liga II average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 50% of CS Dinamo București's matches and 63% of Slatina's.
What form are CS Dinamo București and Slatina in?
Over the last 5 games CS Dinamo București have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Slatina 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CS Dinamo București vs Slatina?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


