CS Marítimo vs Porto II: match statistics
CS Marítimo are top of the table and have a solid home record (42% wins), but their recent form raises doubts – only 1.4 points per game in their last five matches and a DLWWL streak. Porto II are in excellent form with 2.6 points per game in their last five matches (WWDWW) and four consecutive wins, making them a dangerous opponent despite weaker away statistics (33% wins, 42% losses). The hosts have an advantage in possession (58% vs 49%) and a better xG ratio (1.75 vs 1.25), but Porto II show a higher conversion rate (13% vs 8%). Considering both teams have a negative goal difference in the analyzed matches (GD +3 for Marítimo at home, -3 for Porto II away) and high average goals per match (2.08 and 3.08), I expect a balanced, thrilling encounter. The visitors' superb form could neutralize the home advantage, making a draw the most likely outcome.
CS Marítimo vs Porto II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
CS Marítimo played against Porto II in LigaPro (Portugal). The game was played on March 8, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
CS Marítimo has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Porto II has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
CS Marítimo scores 1.58 goals per game and allows 0.79. Porto II scores 1.29 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of CS Marítimo's games and 46% of Porto II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
CS Marítimo has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.24 per game. CS Marítimo takes 14.1 shots per game, while Porto II takes 10.5.
First-half and second-half trends
CS Marítimo leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. Porto II leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
CS Marítimo's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Porto II, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
LigaPro games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
CS Marítimo are top of the table and have a solid home record (42% wins), but their recent form raises doubts – only 1.4 points per game in their last five matches and a DLWWL streak. Porto II are in excellent form with 2.6 points per game in their last five matches (WWDWW) and four consecutive wins, making them a dangerous opponent despite weaker away statistics (33% wins, 42% losses). The hosts have an advantage in possession (58% vs 49%) and a better xG ratio (1.75 vs 1.25), but Porto II show a higher conversion rate (13% vs 8%). Considering both teams have a negative goal difference in the analyzed matches (GD +3 for Marítimo at home, -3 for Porto II away) and high average goals per match (2.08 and 3.08), I expect a balanced, thrilling encounter. The visitors' superb form could neutralize the home advantage, making a draw the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| CS Marítimo | Porto II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Porto II is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - CS Marítimo · 2.6 pts / game - Porto II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
CS Marítimo is 22% better for: goals scored per game.
1.58 goals / game - CS Marítimo · 1.29 goals / game - Porto II
CS Marítimo is 63% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.79 goals / game - CS Marítimo · 1.29 goals / game - Porto II
CS Marítimo scores in 88% of games (21 of 24 meczów), while Porto II keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 meczów).
Porto II scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 meczów), while CS Marítimo keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - CS Marítimo
Over / Under - Porto II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
CS Marítimo is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - CS Marítimo · 1.29 pts / game - Porto II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
CS Marítimo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Porto II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
CS Marítimo
Porto II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LigaPro).
Teams vs league
| CS Marítimo | Liga | Porto II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.38 | 2.47 | ▲ 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 48% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 46% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from CS Marítimo's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Porto II. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of CS Marítimo vs Porto II?
The LigaPro match finished CS Marítimo 2:1 Porto II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before CS Marítimo vs Porto II?
CS Marítimo score 1.58 goals per game on average and Porto II 1.29. The LigaPro average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 42% of CS Marítimo's matches and 46% of Porto II's.
What form are CS Marítimo and Porto II in?
Over the last 5 games CS Marítimo have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Porto II 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for CS Marítimo vs Porto II?
The statistical background for CS Marítimo vs Porto II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.