Hungary - NB IIData current as of September 12, 2026

Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE: match statistics

Csákvári TK crest
Csákvári TK
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Karcag SE crest
Karcag SE

Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Csákvári TK played against Karcag SE in NB II (Hungary). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Csákvári TK has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Karcag SE has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Csákvári TK scores 1.58 goals per game and allows 1.29. Karcag SE scores 1.04 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 2.52 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Csákvári TK's games and 46% of Karcag SE's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 29%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Csákvári TK has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.45 per game. Csákvári TK takes 12.0 shots per game, while Karcag SE takes 11.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Csákvári TK leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Karcag SE leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.71 after halftime.

When the teams score

Csákvári TK's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (9 goals). For Karcag SE, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB II games average 2.52 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Csákvári TK holds a clear advantage based on the numbers: at home they average 1.92 goals per match and have scored 38 goals this season, while Karcag SE have 25 goals in the entire season and score only 0.75 goals per away match on average. The hosts create significantly more high-quality chances — 5.58 shots on target and 13.25 total shots per match with a 14% conversion rate versus 2.75 on target and 9.5 total shots with an 8% conversion for the visitors — and their average xG is 1.64 compared to Karcag’s 1.18 xG, confirming the offensive superiority. Form also favors the home side: in the last 5 matches Csákvári scored 12 goals and recorded a 2-2-1 record (1.6 points per match), while Karcag have 4 goals and a 1-0-4 record in their last 5 (0.6 points per match). Defensively the gap is narrower but still in the hosts’ favor — they concede 1.33 goals at home vs Karcag conceding 1.58 goals away, and the share of games without scoring is 8% for the home team versus 42% for the visitors, which makes it significantly harder for Karcag to pick up points. On this basis I predict a home win and assess the probabilities as 65% for Csákvári, 20% for a draw and 15% for a Karcag win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Csákvári has 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches (4/5) and scored 12 goals in that period, averaging 2.4 per game, with last xG 1.49, indicating high offensive activity from the home side. Seasonally the hosts have xG_for 1.7 and average 1.33 goals per game (38 goals), with an average on-target shots of 5.42, so the probability of the hosts scoring is high. Karcag has weaker offensive efficiency: 0.75 goals per game this season (25 goals) and only 4 goals in the last 5 matches (0.8), although their last 5 matches show xG_for 1.5, meaning they create chances despite poor finishing. The visitors concede 1.58 goals per game this season and 1.8 in the last 5 matches (9 conceded), which increases the chance of the hosts finding the net; considering season BTTS rates of 42% (hosts) and 50% (guests) and a league BTTS level of 47%, the signals favor both teams scoring. Based on the above figures I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability 60% versus 40% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model combining teams' xG and opponents' defensive xG yields an expected 1.63 goals for Csákvári and 1.32 for Karcag, totaling 2.95 goals. Under a Poisson distribution this translates to roughly a 79% chance of Over 1.5 goals, 57% for Over 2.5 and 34% for Over 3.5. The home side generates clearly better-quality chances: on average 5.42 shots on target and xG 1.70 per game versus 2.75 shots on target and xG 1.18 for the visitors, which supports a higher goal count. In the last 5 matches Csákvári scored 12 goals (2.4 per game) and had 80% of games Over 2.5, while Karcag scored 4 goals (0.8) with 40% Over 2.5, reinforcing the over signal. As a result the strongest selection is Over 2.5 — both the combined xG of 2.95 and the home side’s shot dominance and form indicate a higher probability of exceeding this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The HT/FT forecast favors the 1/1 scenario (home team leading at the break and winning by full-time): I assigned it a 45% probability because the home side has a clear offensive advantage — home xG is 1.7 versus the visitors’ 1.18 xG, and the hosts average 5.42 shots on target compared to 2.75 for the away team. In the last 5 matches the home team led at the break in 60% of games (3 of 5) and scored 11 first-half goals, while the visitors scored 4; on average the home team scores 1.4 goals by half-time versus 0.2 for the away side. Additionally, over the season the hosts average 1.33 goals per match versus 0.75 for the visitors, and shot conversion is 10% for the home team against 8% for the away team, which increases the likelihood of maintaining the lead. Although draws at half-time occur frequently season-wide (50% half-time draws for the home side), the distribution also accounts for alternatives: X/1 at 18% and X/X at 12%, while scenarios favoring the away team receive low probabilities due to only 8% away wins across the season.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
24Shots3
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
4Shots on target2
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
2.54xG0.62
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
6Corners0
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
104Dangerous attacks38
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
10Fouls24
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
0Cards3
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Csákvári TKKarcag SE
1.58Goals scored / game1.04
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
1.29Goals allowed / game1.42
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
48%Average possession45%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
4.54Shots on target / game4.08
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.96Shots per game11.75
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
4.54Shots on target4.08
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
13.2%Shot conversion8.9%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
48%Possession45%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
1.49xG for1.45
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
1.65xG against1.5
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

Shooting quality

Csákvári TK: Efficient finishingKarcag SE: Balanced
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Csákvári TK is 167% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Csákvári TK · 0.6 pts / game - Karcag SE

Csákvári TK
LWDWD
Season result split
38% W42% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-5
1.54 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Karcag SE
LLWLL
Season result split
33% W29% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-9
1.29 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-5
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Csákvári TK is 52% better for: goals scored per game.

1.58 goals / game - Csákvári TK · 1.04 goals / game - Karcag SE

Csákvári TK is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.29 goals / game - Csákvári TK · 1.42 goals / game - Karcag SE

Csákvári TK scoring profile: very strong

Csákvári TK scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 meczów), while Karcag SE keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 meczów).

Karcag SE scoring profile: strong

Karcag SE scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 meczów), while Csákvári TK keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 meczów).

38Goals scored (season)25
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
31Goals conceded (season)34
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
2.88Average goals per game2.46
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
12Goals scored (last 5)4
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal67%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
50%2 goals21%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
13%3 goals13%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
8%4 goals4%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
38%2 goals46%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
8%3 goals13%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
4%4 goals4%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time17%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
8%BTTS in both halves8%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
33%Scored in both halves13%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
80%BTTS - last 540%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Csákvári TK is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Csákvári TK · 1 pts / game - Karcag SE

Csákvári TK - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
Karcag SE - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
0.79Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
1.46Average goals (1st half)0.92
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
46%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
42%No goal before half-time67%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

After half-time (2nd half)

1.54Points per game (2nd half)1.25
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.54
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
46%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE
46%No goal after half-time54%
Csákvári TKKarcag SE

Csákvári TK - second-half results

42% W29% D29% L
36
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Karcag SE - second-half results

33% W25% D42% L
24
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Csákvári TK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game1.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game2.21.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Karcag SE - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Csákvári TK
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
4
7
31-45
4
6
46-60
8
2
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Karcag SE
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
9
31-45
6
5
46-60
3
7
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-63%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Csákvári TK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Karcag SE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).

Teams vs league

Csákvári TKLigaKarcag SE
Average goals per game 2.882.52 2.46
Both teams scored 63%47% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%44% 29%
Clean sheets 25%29% 25%
Goal before half-time 79%71% 63%
Goal after half-time 83%81% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / game
1.17
Away goals / game
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Csákvári TKGoalHaragos Viktor
  2. Karcag SEGoalMárton Radics

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Csákvári TK's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Karcag SE. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Karcag SE
1 : 0
Csákvári TK

FAQ

What was the result of Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE?

The NB II match finished Csákvári TK 1:2 Karcag SE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE?

Csákvári TK score 1.58 goals per game on average and Karcag SE 1.04. The NB II average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Csákvári TK's matches and 46% of Karcag SE's.

What form are Csákvári TK and Karcag SE in?

Over the last 5 games Csákvári TK have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Karcag SE 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE?

The statistical background for Csákvári TK vs Karcag SE — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.