Čukarički vs Radnik Surdulica: match statistics
Čukarički vs Radnik Surdulica: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Čukarički played against Radnik Surdulica in SuperLiga (Serbia). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Čukarički has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Radnik Surdulica has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Čukarički scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 1.43. Radnik Surdulica scores 1.23 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 73% of Čukarički's games and 50% of Radnik Surdulica's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 40%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Čukarički has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.49 per game. Čukarički takes 12.6 shots per game, while Radnik Surdulica takes 12.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Čukarički leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Radnik Surdulica leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.53 after halftime.
When the teams score
Čukarički's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (12 goals). For Radnik Surdulica, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
SuperLiga games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The forecast favors the home win (Čukarički). At home Čukarički average 1.73 goals per match with 12.13 shots and 4.6 on target, converting at 14%, whereas Radnik away averages only 0.93 goals with 9.87 shots and 3.27 on target and a 9% conversion. The gap in chance quality is supported by xG — 1.45 xG for Čukarički at home versus 1.19 xG for Radnik away — while defensive numbers are similar (goals conceded 1.33 for hosts vs 1.27 for visitors; xG against 1.52 vs 1.56). Over the last 5 matches both sides average 1.2 points per game, with Radnik scoring 7 goals and Čukarički 4, indicating comparable short-term form. Considering the higher home win rate (47% vs 20%), positive home goal difference (+6 vs -5) and a very low percentage of home matches without a goal (7% vs 53%), I assess probabilities as: home 65%, draw 20%, away 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS (Both Teams To Score) as the more likely outcome in this match. Čukarički at home averages 1.53 goals per game with an xG of 1.79 from 14.6 shots and 4.8 on target, and their home matches have ended BTTS in 60% of cases. Radnik Surdulica has scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 avg) and recorded BTTS in 80% of those games, although seasonally they score 0.93 goals away on average and have 40% BTTS on the road. Both teams concede goals over the season (Čukarički 1.07, Radnik 1.27) and xG against shows 1.2 for the home side and 1.56 for the visitors, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the home BTTS rate of 60% for the hosts, 80% BTTS for the visitors in the last 5, and a league-wide BTTS level of 53%, I assign 65% to 'Yes' vs 35% to 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and statistics I expect approximately 2.88 total expected goals: 1.68 for Čukarički and 1.20 for Radnik Surdulica. Both teams have a high share of matches above 1.5 goals this season — home side 73%, away side 67% — which, combined with total xG = 2.88, yields an estimated probability for Over 1.5 of about 78%. The 2.5 line has moderate support: seasonally Čukarički records Over 2.5 in 53% of matches, Radnik in 27%, and a Poisson model with combined xG 2.88 rates Over 2.5 at ~55%, while Over 3.5 is less likely (~33%). Čukarički averages 14.6 shots with 4.8 on target (conversion ~11%), Radnik 9.87 shots with 3.27 on target (conversion ~9%), which strengthens the hosts’ goal potential. Consequently the strongest and safest signal is backing Over at 1.5 (probability ~78%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Čukarički are clear favorites: they have a 47% win rate versus Radnik’s 20%, average 1.67 points per match versus 0.93, xG 1.79 versus 1.19 and on average 14.6 shots versus 9.87, which confirms superiority in chance creation. A draw at the break is common and usually low-scoring: the hosts were level at half-time in 33% of matches (guests 40%), the hosts average 0.87 goals by half-time vs 0.53 for Radnik, and the hosts kept a clean sheet at the break in 67% of games with both teams scoring by half-time in only 13% of cases. After the break Čukarički show a clear advantage — they score on average 0.67 goals after the break, have accumulated 24 points in second halves (an average of 1.6 points) and scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 1 for Radnik, indicating decisive late goals. For these reasons the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Čukarički | Radnik Surdulica | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Čukarički is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Čukarički · 1.23 goals / game - Radnik Surdulica
Radnik Surdulica is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - Čukarički · 1.17 goals / game - Radnik Surdulica
Čukarički scores in 80% of games (24 of 30 meczów), while Radnik Surdulica keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 meczów).
Radnik Surdulica scores in 67% of games (20 of 30 meczów), while Čukarički keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Čukarički
Over / Under - Radnik Surdulica
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Čukarički is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / game - Čukarički · 1.27 pts / game - Radnik Surdulica
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Čukarički - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Radnik Surdulica - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Čukarički
Radnik Surdulica
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Čukarički | Liga | Radnik Surdulica | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.83 | 2.68 | ▼ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 49% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 29% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 70% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 74% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Čukarički's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Radnik Surdulica. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Čukarički vs Radnik Surdulica?
The SuperLiga match finished Čukarički 2:2 Radnik Surdulica. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Čukarički and Radnik Surdulica?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Čukarički won 0, Radnik Surdulica won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Čukarički vs Radnik Surdulica?
Čukarički score 1.40 goals per game on average and Radnik Surdulica 1.23. The SuperLiga average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Čukarički's matches and 50% of Radnik Surdulica's.
What form are Čukarički and Radnik Surdulica in?
Over the last 5 games Čukarički have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Radnik Surdulica 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Čukarički vs Radnik Surdulica?
The statistical background for Čukarički vs Radnik Surdulica — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


