Czarni Połaniec vs Chełmianka Chełm: match statistics
Chełmianka Chełm displays significantly better form in the last five matches, earning 2.6 points per match compared to 1.4 points for Czarni Połaniec. The visitors have an impressive away record with 50% wins and just 20% losses, and their form in the last five meetings consists of four wins and one draw. Chełmianka also stands out for defensive solidity, conceding just 1 goal in the last five matches and maintaining 40% clean sheets away. Although Czarni Połaniec has a decent home record (75% wins), their overall form is unstable, and the difference in quality between the two teams visible in general statistics favors the visitors. The predicted result is a win for Chełmianka Chełm, who should continue their effective streak.
Czarni Połaniec vs Chełmianka Chełm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Czarni Połaniec played against Chełmianka Chełm in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Czarni Połaniec has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Chełmianka Chełm has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Czarni Połaniec scores 1.79 goals per game and allows 1.74. Chełmianka Chełm scores 1.60 and allows 0.95. Games in this league average 3.29 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Czarni Połaniec's games and 55% of Chełmianka Chełm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 50%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chełmianka Chełm has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.41 per game. Czarni Połaniec takes 4.0 shots per game, while Chełmianka Chełm takes 1.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Czarni Połaniec leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.74 goals per game after halftime. Chełmianka Chełm leads at halftime in 45% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Czarni Połaniec's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (14 goals). For Chełmianka Chełm, it is minutes 0-15 (18 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3 Liga Group 4 games average 3.29 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chełmianka Chełm displays significantly better form in the last five matches, earning 2.6 points per match compared to 1.4 points for Czarni Połaniec. The visitors have an impressive away record with 50% wins and just 20% losses, and their form in the last five meetings consists of four wins and one draw. Chełmianka also stands out for defensive solidity, conceding just 1 goal in the last five matches and maintaining 40% clean sheets away. Although Czarni Połaniec has a decent home record (75% wins), their overall form is unstable, and the difference in quality between the two teams visible in general statistics favors the visitors. The predicted result is a win for Chełmianka Chełm, who should continue their effective streak.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Czarni Połaniec | Chełmianka Chełm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 6% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.35 | 0.91 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.07 | 16.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chełmianka Chełm is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Czarni Połaniec · 2.6 pts / game - Chełmianka Chełm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Czarni Połaniec is 12% better for: goals scored per game.
1.79 goals / game - Czarni Połaniec · 1.6 goals / game - Chełmianka Chełm
Chełmianka Chełm is 83% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.74 goals / game - Czarni Połaniec · 0.95 goals / game - Chełmianka Chełm
Czarni Połaniec scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 meczów), while Chełmianka Chełm keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 meczów).
Chełmianka Chełm scores in 90% of games (18 of 20 meczów), while Czarni Połaniec keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Czarni Połaniec
Over / Under - Chełmianka Chełm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chełmianka Chełm is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Czarni Połaniec · 1.7 pts / game - Chełmianka Chełm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Czarni Połaniec - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Chełmianka Chełm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 60%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (18 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Czarni Połaniec
Chełmianka Chełm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).
Teams vs league
| Czarni Połaniec | Liga | Chełmianka Chełm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.53 | 3.29 | ▼ 2.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▼ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 63% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 23% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 58% | 54% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | • 53% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Czarni PołaniecGoalAdam Kramarz
Head-to-head
Record from Czarni Połaniec's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Chełmianka Chełm. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Czarni Połaniec vs Chełmianka Chełm?
The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished Czarni Połaniec 1:1 Chełmianka Chełm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Czarni Połaniec vs Chełmianka Chełm?
Czarni Połaniec score 1.79 goals per game on average and Chełmianka Chełm 1.60. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Czarni Połaniec's matches and 55% of Chełmianka Chełm's.
What form are Czarni Połaniec and Chełmianka Chełm in?
Over the last 5 games Czarni Połaniec have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chełmianka Chełm 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Czarni Połaniec vs Chełmianka Chełm?
The statistical background for Czarni Połaniec vs Chełmianka Chełm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.