Damash Gilanian vs Kara Gostar: match statistics
Damash Gilanian vs Kara Gostar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Damash Gilanian play Kara Gostar in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 21 June 2026 at 16:30. Venue: SARDAR JANGAL STADIUM. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Damash Gilanian: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Kara Gostar: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Damash Gilanian scores 0.47 and concedes 1.65 goals per match. Kara Gostar scores 0.86 and concedes 0.71. League average: 1.59 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Damash Gilanian 41%, Kara Gostar 57%. Over 2.5: Damash Gilanian 32%, Kara Gostar 14%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
xG, shots and style
Kara Gostar has higher xG: 1.35 vs 0.82. Damash Gilanian: 1.5 shots per match, Kara Gostar: 3.4.
Match halves
Damash Gilanian: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.29. Kara Gostar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
Damash Gilanian: 76-90+ (8 goals). Kara Gostar: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Damash Gilanian sits 18th with a record of 2 wins, 10 draws and 17 losses, scoring 13 and conceding 46; at home they average 0.47 goals scored and concede 1.6 goals per match, with home xG 0.70 versus xG against 1.03. Kara Gostar has only one recorded league match in the data (0 wins, 1 draw, 0 losses, goal difference 1:1) and a points average of 1.0 over the last five matches, but away metrics are zero in the dataset, which limits assessment of the visitors. The hosts create more chances according to available home numbers (5.5 shots and 1.25 shots on target per game) but conversion is low (around 5% and 60% of matches without a goal), reducing the likelihood of turning dominance into a win. Defensively Damash are vulnerable (1.6 conceded at home and a negative home goal difference of -17), and the lack of representative data on the away side makes a draw the safest scenario.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Damash Gilanian | Kara Gostar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | 50% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.55 | 0.39 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.62 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kara Gostar is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Damash Gilanian · 1.8 pts / match - Kara Gostar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kara Gostar is 83% better for: goals scored per match.
0.47 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.86 goals / match - Kara Gostar
Kara Gostar is 132% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.65 goals / match - Damash Gilanian · 0.71 goals / match - Kara Gostar
Damash Gilanian scores in 44% of matches (15 of 34 matches), while Kara Gostar keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
Kara Gostar scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Damash Gilanian keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Damash Gilanian
Over / Under — Kara Gostar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Damash Gilanian - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 6%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kara Gostar - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Damash Gilanian
Kara Gostar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Damash Gilanian | Liga | Kara Gostar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.12 | 1.59 | • 1.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 41% | 30% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 32% | 22% | ▼ 14% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 46% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 74% | 57% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Damash Gilanian vs Kara Gostar?
The Azadegan League match finished Damash Gilanian 1:1 Kara Gostar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Damash Gilanian vs Kara Gostar?
Damash Gilanian score 0.47 goals per game on average and Kara Gostar 0.86. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Damash Gilanian's matches and 57% of Kara Gostar's.
What form are Damash Gilanian and Kara Gostar in?
Over the last 5 games Damash Gilanian have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Kara Gostar 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Damash Gilanian vs Kara Gostar?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.