United States - MLSData current as of 16 July 2026

DC United vs Chicago Fire: match statistics

DC United crest
DC United
1 : 3half-time 1:0
Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire

DC United vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

DC United play Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The match date is 14 May 2026 at 01:30. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

DC United: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Chicago Fire: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

DC United scores 1.40 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 1.93 and concedes 1.14. League average: 3.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: DC United 53%, Chicago Fire 57%. Over 2.5: DC United 53%, Chicago Fire 71%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.38. DC United: 12.3 shots per match, Chicago Fire: 14.9.

Match halves

DC United: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80. Chicago Fire: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

DC United: 76-90+ (7 goals). Chicago Fire: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.30 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict a draw (X): DC United are unbeaten in five (2 wins, 3 draws), scoring 11 goals in that span and averaging 1.8 points per game, while Chicago Fire have only 1 win and 1 draw in their last five (PPG 0.8) despite scoring 12 goals. Both teams create a similar number of chances – DC average 12 shots per home game with 4 on target, Chicago average 10.75 shots with 4 on target as well, but the visitors are more efficient (conversion 14% vs 10%). Offensively the home side score 1.25 goals per home match with xG 1.36, but concede 2.0 goals per game on average (xG against 1.26), whereas Chicago score 1.5 on the road with xG 1.24 and concede 1.5 (xG against 1.62), indicating greater efficiency from the visitors in finishing chances. Additionally, Fire control possession more away (51% vs 44% for DC), and the visitors register 50% draws on the road; combining the hosts’ form with Fire’s high propensity for draws, a shared points outcome is most likely, hence an estimated 40% for a draw, 35% for a DC win and 25% for a Chicago win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
DC UnitedChicago Fire
13Shots14
DC UnitedChicago Fire
6Shots on target8
DC UnitedChicago Fire
1.56xG1.8
DC UnitedChicago Fire
7Corners8
DC UnitedChicago Fire
45Dangerous attacks49
DC UnitedChicago Fire
14Fouls12
DC UnitedChicago Fire
0Cards5
DC UnitedChicago Fire

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

DC UnitedChicago Fire
1.4Goals scored / match1.93
DC UnitedChicago Fire
1.67Goals conceded / match1.14
DC UnitedChicago Fire
40%Average possession53%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
4.4Shots on target / match5.21
DC UnitedChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.27Shots per match14.86
DC UnitedChicago Fire
4.4Shots on target5.21
DC UnitedChicago Fire
11.4%Shot conversion13%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
40%Possession53%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
1.38xG for1.64
DC UnitedChicago Fire
1.54xG against1.38
DC UnitedChicago Fire

Shooting quality

DC United: BalancedChicago Fire: Attacking
DC UnitedChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - DC United · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire

DC United
WDLDD
Season result split
27% W40% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-5
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Chicago Fire
LLWWW
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-4
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - DC United · 1.93 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Chicago Fire is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - DC United · 1.14 goals / match - Chicago Fire

DC United scoring profile: mixed

DC United scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while DC United keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

21Goals scored (season)27
DC UnitedChicago Fire
25Goals conceded (season)16
DC UnitedChicago Fire
3.07Average goals in match3.07
DC UnitedChicago Fire
10Goals scored (last 5)10
DC UnitedChicago Fire
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
DC UnitedChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal93%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
40%2 goals57%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
20%3 goals29%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
13%4 goals7%
DC UnitedChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal57%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
47%2 goals36%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
27%3 goals21%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
20%4 goals0%
DC UnitedChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time29%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
13%BTTS in both halves7%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
27%Scored in both halves36%
DC UnitedChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
80%BTTS - last 580%
DC UnitedChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
DC UnitedChicago Fire

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
DC UnitedChicago Fire

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.53 pts / match - DC United · 1.71 pts / match - Chicago Fire

DC United - half-time state
40% leading33% draw27% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per match (1st half)1.71
DC UnitedChicago Fire
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.79
DC UnitedChicago Fire
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
DC UnitedChicago Fire
1.13Average goals (1st half)1.29
DC UnitedChicago Fire
67%Clean sheet before half-time57%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
53%No goal before half-time36%
DC UnitedChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.5
DC UnitedChicago Fire
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
DC UnitedChicago Fire
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
DC UnitedChicago Fire
1.93Average goals (2nd half)1.79
DC UnitedChicago Fire
40%Clean sheet after half-time64%
DC UnitedChicago Fire
53%No goal after half-time36%
DC UnitedChicago Fire

DC United - second-half results

27% W40% R33% P
23
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding68%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

43% W21% R36% P
24
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

DC United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.600.80
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.21.8
Average goals in match1.42.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5-5
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

DC United
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
5
1
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
1
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.07
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

DC United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

DC UnitedLigaChicago Fire
Average goals in match 3.073.30 3.07
Both teams scored 53%61% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%62% 71%
Clean sheets 27%21% 43%
Goal before half-time 67%78% 79%
Goal after half-time 73%80% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.30
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: DC United 1 - 0 - 0 Chicago Fire. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of DC United vs Chicago Fire?

The MLS match finished DC United 1:3 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before DC United vs Chicago Fire?

DC United score 1.40 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.93. The MLS average is 3.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 53% of DC United's matches and 57% of Chicago Fire's.

What form are DC United and Chicago Fire in?

Over the last 5 games DC United have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for DC United vs Chicago Fire?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for DC United vs Chicago Fire: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.