Defence Force vs Cunupia: match statistics
Defence Force demonstrates a significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at home and a mere 0% loss rate at their own stadium. The hosts occupy a high 2nd position in the table, boasting a +8 goal difference in home matches, while Cunupia has a poor away form with 55% losses and only 36% wins on the road. The visitors concede an average of 2.09 goals per away game, which, compared to Defence Force's average of 1.78 goals scored at home, indicates a clear advantage for the hosts. Additionally, Cunupia failed to keep a clean sheet in 91% of their away matches, while Defence Force maintains clean sheets in 44% of their home games. The recent form from the last 5 matches also favors the hosts, who average 1.4 points per game compared to the visitors' 1.2 points.
Defence Force vs Cunupia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Defence Force played against Cunupia in TT Pro League (Trinidad & Tobago). The game was played on March 20, 2026. Final score: 6:0.
Recent form
Defence Force has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Cunupia has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Defence Force scores 2.45 goals per game and allows 1.00. Cunupia scores 1.58 and allows 2.21. Games in this league average 3.41 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Defence Force's games and 63% of Cunupia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 79%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Defence Force has the higher season xG average, 1.29 to 1.20 per game. Defence Force takes 6.8 shots per game, while Cunupia takes 4.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Defence Force leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Cunupia leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.47 after halftime.
When the teams score
Defence Force's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (22 goals). For Cunupia, it is minutes 0-15 (20 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
TT Pro League games average 3.41 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Defense Force demonstrates a significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at home and a mere 0% loss rate at their own stadium. The hosts occupy a high 2nd position in the table, boasting a +8 goal difference in home matches, while Cunupia has a poor away form with 55% losses and only 36% wins on the road. The visitors concede an average of 2.09 goals per away game, which, compared to Defense Force's average of 1.78 goals scored at home, indicates a clear advantage for the hosts. Additionally, Cunupia failed to keep a clean sheet in 91% of their away matches, while Defense Force maintains clean sheets in 44% of their home games. The recent form from the last 5 matches also favors the hosts, who average 1.4 points per game compared to the visitors' 1.2 points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Defence Force | Cunupia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 58% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.30 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.63 | 0.75 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Defence Force is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Defence Force · 1.2 pts / game - Cunupia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Defence Force is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
2.45 goals / game - Defence Force · 1.58 goals / game - Cunupia
Defence Force is 121% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Defence Force · 2.21 goals / game - Cunupia
Defence Force scores in 90% of games (18 of 20 meczów), while Cunupia keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 meczów).
Cunupia scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 meczów), while Defence Force keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Defence Force
Over / Under - Cunupia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Defence Force is 103% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Defence Force · 0.74 pts / game - Cunupia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Defence Force - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cunupia - second-half results
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (22 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (20 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (27). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Defence Force
Cunupia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (TT Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Defence Force | Liga | Cunupia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.45 | 3.41 | ▲ 3.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 22% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 60% | 43% | ▼ 32% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 49% | ▼ 42% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Defence Force's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Cunupia. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Defence Force vs Cunupia?
The TT Pro League match finished Defence Force 6:0 Cunupia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Defence Force vs Cunupia?
Defence Force score 2.45 goals per game on average and Cunupia 1.58. The TT Pro League average is 3.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Defence Force's matches and 63% of Cunupia's.
What form are Defence Force and Cunupia in?
Over the last 5 games Defence Force have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Cunupia 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Defence Force vs Cunupia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.