Dekani vs Krka: match statistics
Dekani vs Krka: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Dekani play Krka in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 23 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Igrišče Ivan Gregorič. Final score: 4:3.
Current form
Dekani: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Krka: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Dekani scores 1.33 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Krka scores 1.07 and concedes 1.70. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Dekani 53%, Krka 43%. Over 2.5: Dekani 53%, Krka 60%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Krka has higher xG: 1.36 vs 1.32. Dekani: 9.4 shots per match, Krka: 9.9.
Match halves
Dekani: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.63. Krka: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.43.
Goals by minute
Dekani: 16-30 (12 goals). Krka: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Dekani shows superior finishing efficiency at home: on average 1.79 goals per home match, a 20% conversion rate and only 21% of matches without a goal, whereas Krka away records 1.21 goals per match, 11% conversion and 50% of matches goalless. The visitors, however, attempt more shots and more shots on target — 11.54 shots and 4.54 on target away versus 9.14 and 3.86 for the hosts — and post a higher away xG (1.51 vs Dekani’s 1.31 at home), indicating their ability to create chances. Dekani nevertheless better limits the quality of opponent chances at home (average xG against 1.16 versus 1.71 that Krka concedes away) and have a positive home goal difference (+5 GD), while Krka are -1 GD on the road. In recent form both teams are similar in scoring (Dekani 8 goals in the last 5, Krka 9), but Krka have conceded 11 goals in that span and average only 1.2 points per game compared to Dekani’s 1.0, highlighting greater defensive instability for the visitors. Considering the hosts’ higher efficiency and superior limitation of opponent chance quality, I predict a narrow Dekani win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Dekani | Krka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Dekani is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Dekani · 1.2 pts / match - Krka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Dekani is 24% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Dekani · 1.07 goals / match - Krka
Dekani is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.53 goals / match - Dekani · 1.7 goals / match - Krka
Dekani scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Krka keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).
Krka scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Dekani
Over / Under — Krka
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Krka is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / match - Dekani · 1.27 pts / match - Krka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Dekani - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Krka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Dekani
Krka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Dekani | Liga | Krka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.87 | 2.82 | • 2.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 53% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 28% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 74% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 81% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Dekani 0 - 0 - 1 Krka. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Dekani vs Krka?
The 2. SNL match finished Dekani 4:3 Krka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Dekani vs Krka?
Dekani score 1.33 goals per game on average and Krka 1.07. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Dekani's matches and 43% of Krka's.
What form are Dekani and Krka in?
Over the last 5 games Dekani have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Krka 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dekani vs Krka?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.