Slovenia - 2. SNLIgrišče Ivan GregoričData current as of October 16, 2026

Dekani vs NK Vrhnika: match statistics

Dekani crest
Dekani
1 : 0half-time 1:0
NK Vrhnika crest
NK Vrhnika

Dekani vs NK Vrhnika: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Dekani played against NK Vrhnika in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Igrišče Ivan Gregorič. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Dekani has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. NK Vrhnika has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Dekani scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 0.67. NK Vrhnika scores 1.11 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.93 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 11% of Dekani's games and 33% of NK Vrhnika's. The Over 2.5 rates are 22% and 44%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

NK Vrhnika has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.48 per game. Dekani takes 11.8 shots per game, while NK Vrhnika takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Dekani leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.22 goals per game after halftime. NK Vrhnika leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

Dekani's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For NK Vrhnika, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

2. SNL games average 2.93 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dekani have home advantage: they have won 40% of their matches at home and concede just 0.4 goals on average, while NK Vrhnika have lost 50% of their away matches and concede an average of 2 goals. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 80% of their home games, while the visitors have failed to score in 75% of their away matches, which points in Dekani’s favor. Although Vrhnika create more chances away from home, posting an xG of 1.61 compared with Dekani’s home xG of 1.44, they score just 0.5 goals per away game on average, compared with 0.8 for the hosts at home. Both teams have recorded 2 wins and 2 draws in their last five matches, so recent form gives neither a clear edge. Dekani’s poor scoring record, having failed to score in 60% of their home matches, increases the likelihood of a draw, but the defensive gap favors a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest indication against both teams scoring is that NK Vrhnika have failed to score in 75% of their matches, with an away scoring average of just 0.5 goals. Dekani have kept a clean sheet in 40% of their matches and concede an average of 0.8 goals, so the visitors failing to score is a realistic scenario. On the other hand, the hosts average 1.6 goals, while Vrhnika concede 2.0, which points more towards a Dekani goal than a 0:0 scoreline. The visitors have averaged 1.2 goals in their last five matches, but only 25% of their matches this season have seen both teams score, making BTTS - No the pick. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily mean the match will finish 0:0.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest argument for Under 3.5 goals is that this outcome occurred in 80% of Dekani’s matches and 75% of NK Vrhnika’s matches. The hosts concede an average of 0.8 goals, while the visitors score just 0.5 on average and have failed to score in 75% of their matches, limiting the likelihood of a high-scoring game. Dekani could, however, exploit an opposing defense that concedes 2.0 goals per match: their average xG is 1.98, although they have scored just 0.8 goals per game across their last five outings. Despite the league average of 2.97 goals and the visitors’ higher xG of 1.61, their shot conversion rate of 4% points towards a more cautious forecast. The combined expectation of 2.45 goals and the historical frequency of results below 3.5 goals give this line a clearer edge than betting on the 2.5-goal line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal points to Dekani leading at the break: the hosts were ahead at half-time in 3 of their 5 home matches, while NK Vrhnika were trailing at half-time in 3 of their 4 away fixtures. At home, Dekani average 1.0 first-half goal, while the visitors concede an average of 1.0 goal in the first half away from home and have yet to score before the break. The hosts’ advantage also carries through to the full-time results: they win 60% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals, whereas Vrhnika lose 50% of their away matches and concede an average of 2.0 goals. Each team has taken 1.6 points per match across their last five games, so recent form does not offer as clear an edge as the home and away statistics. Despite this uncertainty, Dekani’s frequent half-time leads combined with Vrhnika’s weak away defense make 1/1 the most likely HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
DekaniNK Vrhnika
9Shots6
DekaniNK Vrhnika
2Shots on target1
DekaniNK Vrhnika
1.28xG0.94
DekaniNK Vrhnika
5Corners4
DekaniNK Vrhnika
78Dangerous attacks66
DekaniNK Vrhnika
18Fouls17
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0Cards0
DekaniNK Vrhnika

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.67Goals scored / game1.11
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0.67Goals allowed / game1.33
DekaniNK Vrhnika
50%Average possession55%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
3.44Shots on target / game5
DekaniNK Vrhnika

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.78Shots per game13.33
DekaniNK Vrhnika
3.44Shots on target5
DekaniNK Vrhnika
5.7%Shot conversion8.3%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
50%Possession55%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
1.48xG for1.8
DekaniNK Vrhnika
1.16xG against1.57
DekaniNK Vrhnika

Shooting quality

Dekani: BalancedNK Vrhnika: Balanced
DekaniNK Vrhnika
Accuracy (shots on target)29%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Dekani
DDWWL
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-3
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
NK Vrhnika
WDWLD
Season result split
44% W22% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-3
1.56 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
WLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NK Vrhnika is 66% better for: goals scored per game.

0.67 goals / game - Dekani · 1.11 goals / game - NK Vrhnika

Dekani is 99% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - Dekani · 1.33 goals / game - NK Vrhnika

Dekani scoring profile: mixed

Dekani scores in 33% of games (3 of 9 games), while NK Vrhnika keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 games).

NK Vrhnika scoring profile: more difficult

NK Vrhnika scores in 44% of games (4 of 9 games), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 games).

6Goals scored (season)10
DekaniNK Vrhnika
6Goals conceded (season)12
DekaniNK Vrhnika
1.33Average goals per game2.44
DekaniNK Vrhnika
3Goals scored (last 5)6
DekaniNK Vrhnika
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
DekaniNK Vrhnika

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal44%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
22%2 goals44%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
11%3 goals11%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0%4 goals11%
DekaniNK Vrhnika

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal67%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
22%2 goals33%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0%3 goals11%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0%4 goals11%
DekaniNK Vrhnika

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0%BTTS in both halves11%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
22%Scored in both halves22%
DekaniNK Vrhnika

BTTS and goal count

11%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
20%BTTS - last 540%
DekaniNK Vrhnika

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
DekaniNK Vrhnika

2nd half

44%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
DekaniNK Vrhnika

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NK Vrhnika is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / game - Dekani · 1.33 pts / game - NK Vrhnika

Dekani - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing
NK Vrhnika - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)1.33
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.56
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0.89Average goals (1st half)1.11
DekaniNK Vrhnika
56%Clean sheet before half-time56%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
67%No goal before half-time67%
DekaniNK Vrhnika

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per game (2nd half)1.33
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0.22Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
DekaniNK Vrhnika
0.44Average goals (2nd half)1.33
DekaniNK Vrhnika
78%Clean sheet after half-time56%
DekaniNK Vrhnika
78%No goal after half-time67%
DekaniNK Vrhnika

Dekani - second-half results

22% W56% D22% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

NK Vrhnika - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Dekani - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.80.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
NK Vrhnika - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

NK Vrhnika
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.89
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
65%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
22%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
15%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
38%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.81
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
36%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

NK Vrhnika

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

DekaniLigaNK Vrhnika
Average goals per game▼ 1.332.93▼ 2.44
Both teams scored▼ 11%45%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 22%56%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▲ 56%32%• 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%74%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 44%78%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / game
1.10
Away goals / game
+67%
Home attack advantage
+40%
Home defensive advantage
+39%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Franko Čordaš⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DekaniGoalFranko Čordaš

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Dekani vs NK Vrhnika?

The 2. SNL match finished Dekani 1:0 NK Vrhnika. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Dekani vs NK Vrhnika?

Dekani score 0.67 goals per game on average and NK Vrhnika 1.11. The 2. SNL average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 11% of Dekani's matches and 33% of NK Vrhnika's.

What form are Dekani and NK Vrhnika in?

Over the last 5 games Dekani have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and NK Vrhnika 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dekani vs NK Vrhnika?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Dekani vs NK Vrhnika: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.