Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado: match statistics
Delta Putra Sidoarjo exhibits significantly better form and stats on their home turf. The hosts have won 43% of their home matches this season, scoring an average of 1.57 goals while conceding just 1.0 per game. Their average xG of 1.94 in home fixtures indicates solid offensive potential. Kendal Tornado has dramatic away statistics – 100% losses in away matches, with zero goals scored and zero shots on target registered in such games. The class difference between the two teams is immense, which, combined with home advantage, gives Delta Putra Sidoarjo a very high chance of triumph. The only risk factor is the hosts' weaker form in the last five matches, but the visitors' complete helplessness on the road tips the scales in favor of Delta Putra Sidoarjo.
Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Delta Putra Sidoarjo played against Kendal Tornado in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on January 11, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Delta Putra Sidoarjo has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Kendal Tornado has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.75 points per game.
Scoring records
Delta Putra Sidoarjo scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 0.93. Kendal Tornado scores 1.50 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Delta Putra Sidoarjo's games and 50% of Kendal Tornado's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 50%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kendal Tornado has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.51 per game. Delta Putra Sidoarjo takes 12.2 shots per game, while Kendal Tornado takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Delta Putra Sidoarjo leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Kendal Tornado leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Delta Putra Sidoarjo's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Kendal Tornado, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 2 games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Delta Putra Sidoarjo exhibits significantly better form and stats on their home turf. The hosts have won 43% of their home matches this season, scoring an average of 1.57 goals while conceding just 1.0 per game. Their average xG of 1.94 in home fixtures indicates solid offensive potential. Kendal Tornado has dramatic away statistics – 100% losses in away matches, with zero goals scored and zero shots on target registered in such games. The class difference between the two teams is immense, which, combined with home advantage, gives Delta Putra Sidoarjo a very high chance of triumph. The only risk factor is the hosts' weaker form in the last five matches, but the visitors' complete helplessness on the road tips the scales in favor of Delta Putra Sidoarjo.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Delta Putra Sidoarjo | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kendal Tornado is 119% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.75 pts / game - Kendal Tornado
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kendal Tornado is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
1.29 goals / game - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.5 goals / game - Kendal Tornado
Kendal Tornado is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.93 goals / game - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 0.75 goals / game - Kendal Tornado
Delta Putra Sidoarjo scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).
Kendal Tornado scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while Delta Putra Sidoarjo keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Delta Putra Sidoarjo
Over / Under - Kendal Tornado
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Delta Putra Sidoarjo is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / game - Delta Putra Sidoarjo · 1.5 pts / game - Kendal Tornado
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Delta Putra Sidoarjo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kendal Tornado - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.3 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 25% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Delta Putra Sidoarjo
Kendal Tornado
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| Delta Putra Sidoarjo | Liga | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.21 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 30% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 68% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?
The Liga 2 match finished Delta Putra Sidoarjo 3:1 Kendal Tornado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?
Delta Putra Sidoarjo score 1.29 goals per game on average and Kendal Tornado 1.50. The Liga 2 average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Delta Putra Sidoarjo's matches and 50% of Kendal Tornado's.
What form are Delta Putra Sidoarjo and Kendal Tornado in?
Over the last 5 games Delta Putra Sidoarjo have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kendal Tornado 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado?
The statistical background for Delta Putra Sidoarjo vs Kendal Tornado — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.