India - I-LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Dempo vs Shillong Lajong: match statistics

Dempo crest
Dempo
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Shillong Lajong crest
Shillong Lajong

Dempo vs Shillong Lajong: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Dempo play Shillong Lajong in I-League (India). The match date is 7 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Dempo: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Shillong Lajong: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Dempo scores 1.21 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Shillong Lajong scores 1.93 and concedes 0.86. League average: 3.03 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Dempo 57%, Shillong Lajong 50%. Over 2.5: Dempo 50%, Shillong Lajong 50%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Shillong Lajong has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.34. Dempo: 9.4 shots per match, Shillong Lajong: 9.5.

Match halves

Dempo: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.64. Shillong Lajong: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.21.

Goals by minute

Dempo: 46-60 (4 goals). Shillong Lajong: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

I-League: 3.03 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.

Match description

I predict a draw because both teams exhibit a strong trend toward splitting points: Dempo has 100% draws at home (3 draws, 0 wins this season), while Shillong Lajong records 67% draws away. Dempo at home averages 1.5 goals scored and 1.5 conceded per match, has home xG of 2.12 and 5 shots on target per game (7 goals this season, 5 in the last 5), indicating chance creation without converting into wins. Shillong shows clear defensive superiority: just 0.33 goals conceded away on average, 67% clean sheets and 5 goals conceded this season versus 12 conceded by Dempo, and in the last 5 matches they average 1.6 points compared to 0.4 for the hosts. At the same time the visitors score 1.0 goal away on average with an 11% conversion rate and 4.33 shots on target, suggesting an even, low-scoring affair; for these reasons a draw appears most likely.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
DempoShillong Lajong
9Shots8
DempoShillong Lajong
6Shots on target1
DempoShillong Lajong
1.35xG1.08
DempoShillong Lajong
5Corners4
DempoShillong Lajong
49Dangerous attacks69
DempoShillong Lajong
-1Fouls-1
DempoShillong Lajong
4Cards3
DempoShillong Lajong

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

DempoShillong Lajong
1.21Goals scored / match1.93
DempoShillong Lajong
1.29Goals conceded / match0.86
DempoShillong Lajong
46%Average possession54%
DempoShillong Lajong
3.93Shots on target / match4
DempoShillong Lajong

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.36Shots per match9.5
DempoShillong Lajong
3.93Shots on target4
DempoShillong Lajong
13%Shot conversion20.3%
DempoShillong Lajong
46%Possession54%
DempoShillong Lajong
1.34xG for1.49
DempoShillong Lajong
1.53xG against1.37
DempoShillong Lajong

Shooting quality

Dempo: Counter-attackingShillong Lajong: Efficient finishing
DempoShillong Lajong
Accuracy (shots on target)42%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shillong Lajong is 83% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Dempo · 2.2 pts / match - Shillong Lajong

Dempo
DWLDD
Season result split
21% W43% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-5
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Shillong Lajong
DWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W36% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shillong Lajong is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - Dempo · 1.93 goals / match - Shillong Lajong

Shillong Lajong is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Dempo · 0.86 goals / match - Shillong Lajong

Dempo scoring profile: strong

Dempo scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 matches).

Shillong Lajong scoring profile: very strong

Shillong Lajong scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Dempo keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

17Goals scored (season)27
DempoShillong Lajong
18Goals conceded (season)12
DempoShillong Lajong
2.5Average goals in match2.79
DempoShillong Lajong
3Goals scored (last 5)12
DempoShillong Lajong
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
DempoShillong Lajong

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal79%
DempoShillong Lajong
29%2 goals50%
DempoShillong Lajong
14%3 goals29%
DempoShillong Lajong
0%4 goals21%
DempoShillong Lajong

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal57%
DempoShillong Lajong
50%2 goals21%
DempoShillong Lajong
7%3 goals7%
DempoShillong Lajong
0%4 goals0%
DempoShillong Lajong

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time14%
DempoShillong Lajong
7%BTTS in both halves7%
DempoShillong Lajong
29%Scored in both halves43%
DempoShillong Lajong

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
DempoShillong Lajong
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
DempoShillong Lajong
40%BTTS - last 540%
DempoShillong Lajong

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
DempoShillong Lajong
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
DempoShillong Lajong
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
DempoShillong Lajong

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
DempoShillong Lajong
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
DempoShillong Lajong
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
DempoShillong Lajong

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shillong Lajong is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Dempo · 1.57 pts / match - Shillong Lajong

Dempo - half-time state
29% leading36% draw36% trailing
Shillong Lajong - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.57
DempoShillong Lajong
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.71
DempoShillong Lajong
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
DempoShillong Lajong
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.29
DempoShillong Lajong
50%Clean sheet before half-time57%
DempoShillong Lajong
50%No goal before half-time50%
DempoShillong Lajong

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)2.29
DempoShillong Lajong
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)1.21
DempoShillong Lajong
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.29
DempoShillong Lajong
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.5
DempoShillong Lajong
43%Clean sheet after half-time71%
DempoShillong Lajong
43%No goal after half-time29%
DempoShillong Lajong

Dempo - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shillong Lajong - second-half results

71% W14% R14% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dempo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Shillong Lajong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Dempo
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
4
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Shillong Lajong
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
7
0
31-45
6
4
46-60
5
0
61-75
6
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Dempo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Shillong Lajong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

DempoLigaShillong Lajong
Average goals in match 2.503.03 2.79
Both teams scored 57%64% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%56% 50%
Clean sheets 29%20% 43%
Goal before half-time 79%73% 79%
Goal after half-time 86%89% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.03
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Dempo 1 - 2 - 0 Shillong Lajong. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Shillong Lajong
0 : 0
Dempo
Dempo SC
2 : 2
Shillong Lajong FC
Shillong Lajong FC
0 : 2
Dempo SC

FAQ

What was the result of Dempo vs Shillong Lajong?

The I-League match finished Dempo 3:0 Shillong Lajong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Dempo and Shillong Lajong?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Dempo won 1, Shillong Lajong won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Dempo vs Shillong Lajong?

Dempo score 1.21 goals per game on average and Shillong Lajong 1.93. The I-League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Dempo's matches and 50% of Shillong Lajong's.

What form are Dempo and Shillong Lajong in?

Over the last 5 games Dempo have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Shillong Lajong 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Dempo vs Shillong Lajong?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.